English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110936/141856 (78%)
Visitors : 47728039      Online Users : 1054
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95340


    Title: 政策利害關係人對廉政政策順服與政治信任感關聯性之研究-以環保署業務往來之廠商為例
    Policy stakeholder’s policy compliance and political trust: a case study of the environmental protection administration in Taiwan
    Authors: 楊華興
    Contributors: 陳義彥
    楊華興
    Keywords: 政策順服
    政治信任感
    廉政倫理規範
    policy compliance
    Political Trust
    Ethics Direction for Civil Servants
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 15:44:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以Easton政治支持理論架構,探討不同人口背景與政治態度的政策利害關係人之政策順服影響因素,並就政策執行監測觀點,將順服變數,分從政策認知、政策環境、執行成效滿意度、利害關係人之行為配合度等面向加以剖析,再檢視不同個人對政策順服的差異與其政治信任感有無關連,以獲得理論上驗證。
    廉政政策的執行評估或評價,廠商較一般民眾認知更為成熟,對「廉政倫理規範」相關事務的理解能力相對熟悉,故選擇以廠商(即本文政策利害關係人)為研究對象。依照首揭研究目的,假設「認知」與「環境壓力」兩個因素為影響個人對於廉政政策滿意度與行為傾向的主要因素,即個人對於廉政政策所持為正向認知,其所處政策環境會迫使自己遵守廉政政策規範,有助於廉政政策滿意度的提升與行為上的順服。反之,個人對於廉政政策所持為負向認知,且所處政策環境會促使自己規避廉政政策規範者,將使個人不滿意現行政策施行的效果,致滿意度降低與行為上的不順服。
    研究結果發現,政策利害關係人的政黨認同對廉政政策順服有影響,其原因可能由於個人的背景不同,使得生活經驗就有所不同,所以形塑每個人的政策認知深度、支持態度、政策滿意度及行動參與意向等表現不同,因此使政策利害關係人在「廉政政策順服」量表的表現強弱也有所差異。此外,在政治信任感方面,與以往的研究結果對照,可以發現政治信任感也是呈現低度水準,並與性別、教育程度、業務類別、政黨認同、所得收入等變項顯著相關。若從廉政政策順服與政治信任感之關聯性探討,發現廉政政策順服與政治信任感呈顯著相關,其中廉政政策順服構面之「環境壓力」、「滿意度」、「行為傾向」等變項的相關程度較高。
    最後,本文探求廉政政策執行及成效評估等有關廉政政策推動策略的建議,期能提供作為政策執行的重要參考。

    關鍵字:政策利害關係人、政策順服、政策執行、政治信任感、廉政倫理規範
    Based on David Easton`s framework of political-system support theory, this study discussed the factors that influence policy compliance of policy stakeholders with different background and political attitudes. From the point of view of policy monitoring , it analyzed the variables affecting compliance from the aspects of policy cognition, policy environment, satisfaction of implementation effectiveness, and cooperation degree of policy stakeholders. Furthermore, it examined the correlations between policy compliance and political trust of each individual in order to get the verification of theory.
    When it comes to the evaluation and appraisal of the implementation of the anticorruption policy, vendors are ,compared to the general public, more familiar to the affairs concerning Ethics Direction for Civil Servants. This study has selected vendors (i.e. the policy stakeholders) as the research objects. According to the study goal, the "cognition" and the "environmental pressure" were assumed to be two main factors affecting individual satisfaction and behavioral orientation toward the anticorruption policy. When an individual holds a positive cognition toward the anticorruption policy, the policy environment will force the individual to comply with the policy. The satisfaction toward the policy and the behavioral compliance will be fostered. On the contrary, if an individual holds a negative cognition toward the policy, and the policy environment will discourage the individual to comply with the provisions of the anticorruption policy. The individual will not satisfy with the implementing results of the current policy. It will impede the satisfaction and lower the behavioral compliance.
    The study found that the party identification of the policy stakeholders would influence their compliance to the anticorruption policy. The reason might be that different backgrounds make different life experiences. This molds individual into different level of policy cognition, attitude of support, policy satisfaction and participation orientation, and in turn makes different representation on scale of compliance of the anticorruption policy. In addition, the political trust, when compared to previous studies, was found to be at a low level, and significantly related to gender, education level, job category, party identification and income level. When exploring from the correlation between the anticorruption policy and the political trust, the study found a significant correlation between them. Among variables of anticorruption policy dimension, "environmental pressure," "degree of satisfaction" and "behavioral orientation" have high levels of correlation with political trust.
    Lastly, this study has explored suggestions to the implementation and evaluation of strategies related to the promotion of anticorruption policy in hope to serve as an important reference to the policy implementation.

    Key word:policy stakeholder, policy compliance, policy implementation, Political Trust, Ethics Direction for Civil Servants
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    王浦劬譯,1992,David, Easton著,《政治生活的系統分析》,台北:桂冠。
    王靖興、孫天龍,2005,〈臺灣民眾民主政治評價影響因素之分析〉《臺灣民主季刊》,2(3):55-79。
    江岷欽、劉坤億,1999,《企業型政府-理念•實務•省思》,台北:智勝文化。
    朱志宏,2000,《公共政策》,台北:三民書局。
    朱曉玉,2005,〈我國獨立選民投票行為之研究-2000年與2004年總統選舉之分析與比較〉,銘傳大學公共事務學研究所碩士論文。
    李允傑、丘昌泰,2003,《政策執行與評估》,台北:元照。
    李明寰譯,2002,William N. Dunn著,《公共政策分析》,台北:時英出版社。
    李美華、孔祥明、林嘉娟、王婷玉等譯,1998,Earl Babbie著,《社會科學研究方法》,台北:時英出版社。
    余致力,2006,〈倡廉反貪與民主治理〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(3),165-176。
    吳俊瑤,2002,〈國民小學教師政治態度之研究〉,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    吳定,1999,《公共政策辭典》,台北:五南書局。
    吳重禮、許文賓,2003,〈誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?──以二○○一年台灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例〉,《政治科學論叢》,18:101-140。
    沈坦毅,2006,〈北市大學生公民信任與效能之調查分析-一個政治積極主義視野〉,銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士班學位論文。
    林水波等,1997,《強化政策執行能力之理論建構》,台北:行政院研考會。
    林水波、張世賢,1999,《公共政策》,台北:五南圖書公司。
    林冠伶,2006,〈臺北市政府民政局『宗教團體財務查核簽證專案』執行之研究-標的團體順服的觀點〉,國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
    林嘉誠,1985,《政治心理與政治行為》,台北:書林公司。
    林鐘沂,2000,《公共事務的設計與執行》,台北:幼獅文化。
    林聰吉,2007,〈政治支持與民主鞏固〉,《政治科學論叢》,34:71-104。
    梁淑芬,2007,〈政治信任的來源與民主效果:以機構信任為分析焦點〉,淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士論文。
    孫天龍,2006,〈新聞媒介使用與民眾政治功效意識之關聯〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士論文。
    許文賓,2002,〈誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民:以2001年臺灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    陳巧如,2004,〈環境主義與政策順服:以台北市限用塑膠袋政策為例〉,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
    陳義彦,1979,《臺灣地區大學生政治社會化之研究》。台北:德成書店。
    陳義彥、陳陸輝,2004,〈台灣大學生政治定向的持續與變遷〉,《東吳政治學報》,18:1-32。
    陳義彥、洪永泰、盛杏湲、游清鑫、鄭夙芬、陳陸輝等,2004,《民意調查》,台北:五南圖書公司。
    陳俊明,2008,〈法務部96年臺灣地區廉政指標民意調查〉,《中華民國96年政風工作年報》:199-211。
    陳陸輝、陳義彥,2002,〈政治功效意識、政治信任感以及臺灣選民的民主價值〉,「2001年選舉與民主化調查研究學術研討會」論文。台北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心,10月19-20日。
    陳陸輝,2002,〈政治信任感與臺灣地區選民投票行為〉,《選舉研究》,9(2):65-84。
    陳陸輝,2004,〈政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,7(2):149-188。
    陳陸輝,2006,〈政治信任的政治後果─以2004年立法委員選舉為例〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(2):39-62。
    陳陸輝、耿曙,2008,〈政治效能感與政黨認同對選民投票抉擇的影響-以2002年北高市長選舉為例〉,《台灣民主季刊》,5(1):87-118。
    陳敦源、蔡秀涓,2006,〈國家發展的倫理基礎:反貪腐與公職人員倫理準則〉,《臺灣民主季刊》3(3):185-200。
    陳愷,1990,〈政策執行中順服觀念的探討—以台北市交通警察取締道路違規駕駛為例〉,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    曹俊漢,2003,《行政現代化的迷思:全球化下台灣行政發展面臨的挑戰》,台北:韋伯文化。
    盛杏湲,2002,〈統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:1990年代的分析〉,《選舉研究》,9(1):41-80。
    盛治仁,2003,〈台灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究:政黨輪替前後的比較〉,《選舉研究》,10(1):115-169。
    游清鑫,2004,〈2004年台灣總統選舉—政治信任的缺乏與未鞏固的民主〉,《台灣民主季刊》,1(2):193-200。
    張潤書,1998,《行政學》。台北:三民書局。
    黃冠達,2006,〈台灣民眾政治支持之研究〉,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
    黃信豪,2006,〈政治功效意識的行動效果〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(2):119-158。
    黃榮護,2003,〈從公共事務管理觀點論肅貪防腐之功能:以香港廉政公署社區關係處為例〉,台灣透明組織協會主辦之「倡廉反貪與行政透明」研討會論文。
    彭文賢,1988,《行政生態學》,台北:三民書局。
    辜淑琴,1985,〈社會化機構對政治態度形成影響之研究-以臺北市松山區公民為例〉,私立東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    楊日青、李培元、林文斌、劉兆隆譯,2002,Andrew, Heywood著,《最新政治學新論》,台北:韋伯文化。
    詹瑞益,1982,〈公共政策之順從理論〉,國立中興大學公共行政暨政策研究所碩士論文。
    蔡璧煌、陳俊明,2000,《轉型與發展:邁向新世紀的臺灣》。台北:國家發展研究院。
    劉義周,1994,〈臺灣選民政黨形象的世代差異〉,《選舉研究》,1(1):53-73。
    魏武盛,2004,〈基層官員政策執行與政策順服之研究:以大台北地區違反道路交通管理事件處罰為例〉,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
    蕭全政、林鍾沂、江岷欽、黃朝盟譯,2001,Nicholos Henry著,行政學新論,臺北:韋伯文化。
    蘇永明,1989,〈艾氏(A.Etzioni)順從理論及其對教育組織的啟示〉,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。

    二、英文部分
    Abramson, Paul R., and John H. Aldrich. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in American.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 76, No. 3:502-21.
    Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in American:Formation and Change. San Francisco:W.H.Freeman and Company Press.
    Anderson, James E. 2000. Public Policymaking. New York:Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Anderson, James E. 2003. Public Policymaking. New York:Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Balch, G. 1974. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept ‘Sense of Political Efficacy.’ ” Political Methodology, Vol. 1, No. 2:1-43.
    Bianco,William. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
    Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
    Carnevale David G. 1995. Trustworthy Government : Lenderghip and Management Strategies for Building Trust and High Performance., Josse-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
    Carroll, John S. 1986. “A Cognitive-Process Analysis of Taxpayer Compliance.” , National Academy of Sciences, South PadreIsland, Texas.
    Chanley, Virginia A. 2002. “Trust in Government in the Aftermath of 9/11:Determinants and Consequences.” Political Psychogy, Vol. 23, No.3:469-483.
    Chanley, Virginia A., Thomas J. Rudolph, and Wendy M. Rahn. 2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government:A Time Series Andysis.” The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 64, No.3:239-256.
    Citrin, Jack. 1974. “Comment:The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 68, No. 3:973-88.
    Conway, Margaret M. 1991. Political Participation in the United States. Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press.
    Crotty, William. 1991. Political Science:Looking to the Future., vol.4. Illinos:Northwestern University Press.
    Croph Robert A. 2008. American Public Administration: Public Service For the 21st Century., St.:Louis University Press.
    Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of the Political Life. New York:John Wiley.
    Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science.5(4): 435-457.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 1975. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations:on power, involvement, and their correlates., New York:Free Press.
    Fukuyama Francis. 1995. Trust:the social virtues and the creation of prosperity., New York: Free Press.
    Gamson, William A.1968. Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL.:The Dosey Press.
    Hanekom, S. X. 1987. Public Policy. N.Y: International Thomson Publishing Ltd.
    Hetherington, M. J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 4:791-808.
    Hetherington, M. J. 1999. “The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968-96.” American Political Science Review, Vol.93, No.2:311-326.
    Kelman, Herbert C. 1958. “Compliance, Identification, and Internalization:Three Process of Attitude Change.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2:51-60.
    Kettl, D. 1998. After the reinvention: Governance for the 21st Century. Washingtion. D.C: Bookings.
    Lipset, S. M. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    McClosky, Herbert, J. Merrill Shanks and Paul M. Sniderman.1975. “Personal and Political Sources of Political Alienation.” BritishJournal of Political Science,5:1-31.
    Miller, Arthur H. 1974. “Political Issue and Trust in Government: 1964-1970.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 68, No. 3:951-72.
    Milward, H. B., and Donald F. Kettl. 1996. The state of public management, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 1997. “Introduction: The Decline of Confidence in Governent.” In Why people Don`t Trust Government, eds. Joseph S. Nye, Jr., philip, D. Zelikow. and David, C. King. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.1-18.
    Pippa, Norris. 1999. “Conclusions:The Growth of Critical Citical Citizens and Its Consequences.” In Citical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.257-272.
    Piotr, Sztompka. 1997. “Trust, Distrust and the Paradox of Democracy.”, http://skylla.wz-berlin.de/pdf/1997/p97-003.pdf.
    Rodgers, Harrell R., jr., and Bullock Charles S. 1976. Coercion to Compliance, Lexington, Massachusetts:D. C.:Heathand Company.
    Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracyin America. New York: MacMillan.
    Shaffer, Stephen D. 1981. “A Multivariate Explanation of Decreasing Turnout in Presidential Elections, 1960-1976.” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 1:68-95.
    Stover, Robert V. and Brown, Don W., 1975. “Understanding Compliance and Noncompliance with: The Contributions of Utility Theory.” Social Science Quarterly:363-375.
    Kim Sunhyuk. 2004., Political Trust, Institutional Reform, and Democratic Deepening in Korea., Department of Public Administration of Korea University.
    Valerie, Braithwaithe. and Margaret, Levi., eds. 1998. “Trust and governance.” The Russell Sage Foundation series on trust ; v.1, pp.30-62.
    Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1984. “Economic Stagflation and Public Support for the political System.” British Journal of Political Science, Vol.14, No.2:187-205.
    Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1989. “Political Economic and Political Legitimacy: The Link Between Economic Policy and Trust.” In Economic Decline and Political Change, eds. Harold D.Clarke, Marianne Stewart, and Gary Zuk. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp.225-252.
    Willam, Mishler. and Richard, Rose. 2001. “What are the origins of political trust:Testing institutional and cultural theories in Post-Communist societies.”Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 34, No.1, pp.30-62.
    Williams, B. 1985. “Systematic Influences on Political Trust: the Importance of Perceived Institutional Performance.” Political Methodology, Vol. 11, No.2:125-42.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    91921052
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919210521
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2259View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback