English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47761693      Online Users : 697
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95416


    Title: 當日沖銷交易獲利影響因素之研究
    Authors: 賴慧君
    Contributors: 周行一
    賴慧君
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 16:13:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   在美國傳統市場體制下,造市者(market maker)擁有市場的主宰權,一般投資人(retail investors)交易地位居於顯著弱勢,因而未具參與當沖交易活動的足夠條件;直至制定OHR (Order Handling Rule)法規、修正SOES (Small Order Execution System) 使用規定、ECNs (Electronic Communication Networks)與當沖券商興起後,一群以一般投資人為主的專業當沖者方才陸續出現並快速成長,他們藉由特有交易地位,利用多元市場、多元造市者與多元交易機制特性,設計出與造市者對作的套利當沖交易形態。因此,造市者的報價動作、投資人所擁有的資訊系統效能與本身下單速度等因素,為獲利水準的主要影響因子。
      台灣集中市場為一集合競價市場,由投資人委託單決定市場流動性與價格,每位投資人的基本交易地位幾近均等,在此種交易市場模式下,並未存在與造市者對作的套利空間,一般投資人投入當沖交易的情況卻仍然熱絡,則其是否獲利、以及獲利影響因子又為何?
      本研究經以86年度台積電與聯電之交易資料進行統計分析,研究發現如下:
      1.整體當沖交易之單位毛利為正,惟因買賣價差空間相當小,故於扣除相關交易成本後,單位淨利出現負值,顯示當沖並非一容易獲利之交易策略。
      2.市場波動性愈大、流動性愈大,交易報酬愈高。
      3.投資人的個股與同產業跨股交易經驗,有助於其提升當沖報酬。
      4.交易量大之當沖者,可能採取低單位獲利、高交易量之交易策略。
      5.投資人交易部位持有時間愈長,其單位交易毛利愈低,可能反應投資人的日內惜售行為。
      6.台積電以作空者之交易報酬均值較高,顯示作多者可能因券源限制而無法自由控制出場時間,導致毛利表現相對不佳;惟聯電的檢定結果出現不一致,故作多或作空策略是否可為當沖獲利指標之一,需再進一步研究。
    Reference: 一、英文文獻
    1.Ackert,L.F. and B.Church, third quarter, 1998, Competitiveness and Price Setting in Dealer Markets, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review.
    2.Baird,A.J., 2001, Electronic trading Master``s Secrets from the Pros, John Wileys & Sons,Inc.
    3.Baird,B. and C. McBurney, 1999, Electronic day trading to win, John Wileys & Sons,Inc.
    4.Barclay,M.J., W.Christie, J.Harris, E.Kandel and P.Schultz, 1999, The Effect of Market Reform on the Trading Costs and Depths of Nasdaq Stocks, Journal of Finance 54, 1-34.
    5.Battalio,R., B.Hatch, and R.Jennings, 1997, SOES Trading and Market Volatility, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32, No.2, 225-238.
    6.Christie,W. J.Harris and P.Schultz, 1994, Why Did Nasdaq Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd-Eight Quotes?, Journal of Finance 49, 1841-1860.
    7.Christie,W. and P.Schultz, 1994, Why Do Nasdaq Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eight Qouotes? , Journal of Finance 49, 1813-1840.
    8.Christie,W. and P.Schultz, 1999, The Initiation and Withdraw of Odd-Eight Quotes Among Nasdaq Stocks: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 52, 409-442.
    9.Cohen,S.S., 1999, The Empires Strike Back — Part1:The War Against Day Trading, //www.electronic-traders.org/press143.html.
    10.Faucaulty,T., A.Roell and P.Sandas, 1999, Imperfect Market Monitoring and SOES Trading, Working Paper.
    11.Hariss,J. and P.Schultz, 1997, The Importance of Firm Quotes and Rapid Executions: Evidence from The January 1994 SOES Rules Change. Journal of Financial Economics 45, 135-166.
    12.Hariss,J. and P.Schultz, 1998, The trading profits of SOES bandits. Journal of Financial Economics 50, 39-62.
    13.Huang,R.D., 2000, Price Discovery by ECNs and Nasdaq Market Makers ,Owen Graduate School of Management Vanderbilt University.
    14.Kandel,E. and L.Marx, 1999, Odd-eight Avoidance as a Defense Against SOES Bandits , Journal of Financial Economics 51, 85-102.
    15.NASAA (North American Securities Administrators Association), 1999, Report of the day trading project group findings and recommendations, //www.nasaa.org/daytradingreport.htm.
    16.Permanent subcommittee on investigations of committee on governmental affairs united states senate,2000, Day Trading: everyone gambles but the house, //www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/022400_report.htm.
    17.Schwert,G.W., 1997, Symposium on market microstructure: Focus on Nasdaq, Journal of Financial Economics 45 , 3-8.
    18.SEC(Securities and Exchang Commission’s), 2000, Special study: Report of examinations od Day-Trading Broker-Dealers, //www.sec.gov/news/studies/daytrep.htm.
    19.SEC,(Securities and Exchang Commission’s) ,2000, Electronic Communication Networks and After-Hours Trading, //www.sec.gov/news/studies/ecnafter.htm.
    二、中文文獻
    1. 陳世城,「台灣股票市場當日沖銷之研究」,國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十四年六月。
    2. 畢祖明,「證券交易當日沖銷之評估與實證研究」,國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十四年六月。
    3. 許秋瑾,「信用交易資券相抵實施對股市之影響」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十八年六月。
    4. 曾耀輝,「我國證券市場信用交易資券相抵交割制度實施狀況分析」,證交資料,第429期,民國八十七年三月。
    5. 賴維德,「當日沖銷交易策略之獲利性研究」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十三年七月。
    6. 謝青良,「信用交易資券相抵實施對證券市場流動性、波動性、成交量及尾盤價格之影響」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十四年六月。
    7. 葛雷格利Ÿ米勒曼,「e當沖大師-股市掏金術」,繆淑君譯,時報出版社,民89。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    87355049
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000189
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administation] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback