English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49749984      Online Users : 907
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95773


    Title: 激進年代學者的中國研究──馬思樂、馬克林、范乃思、王海、李歐梵
    Other Titles: China Scholars of the Radical Years-Meisner, Mackerras, Van Ness, Heberer, and Lee
    Authors: 石之瑜;廖國智;許韋婷
    Shih, Chih-Yu;Liao, Kuo-Chih;Hsu, Wei-Tin
    Keywords: 馬思樂;馬克林;范乃思;王海;李歐梵
    Maurice Meisner;Colin Mackerras;Peter Van Ness;Thomas Heberer,and Leo Lee
    Date: 2011-09
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 16:59:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 激進年代學者指1960 年代成長，而今已為耆老的知識分子。1960 年代適逢中國發生文化大革命，美國與歐洲同時爆發學潮，影響了一代學者的養成，其中不乏後來成為中國研究的專家，散布各地。本文選擇性的比較不同背景的激進年代學者，包括從捍衛中國共產主義革命到捍衛馬克思主義的美國學者馬思樂（Maurice Meisner：馬克思主義）、在文革前已蒞臨中國從戲曲研究轉為少數民族研究的澳洲學者馬克林（Colin Mackerras：戲曲與少數民族）、從借用中國反抗美國帝國主義到全面反對政治壓迫的美國學者范乃思（Peter Van Ness：外交與人權）、從熱衷毛澤東主義到發掘基層民族企業家能動性的德國學者王海（Thomas Heberer：少數民族與地方經濟）與從找尋邊緣位置到定位於世界主義的華裔學者李歐梵（Leo Lee：文學）。他們共同受到文化大革命的影響，但後來基於各自的社會遭遇與思想成長，開展出各具特色的中國研究。本文歸納發現他們研究中國的時間與地點影響到他們如何調整研究策略。
    In this paper, the radical years refer to the late 1960s and the early 1970s. China scholars going through the radical years in the early stage of their career witnessed both the anti-war student movements in their society and the Cultural Revolution in China. This paper selects five China scholars of the radical years to compare their strategy of adjustment in the aftermath of the Cultural Revolution and into the year of reform and openness in China. They include Maurice Meisner who used to take on China as a site to develop Marxism, Colin Mackerras who has been able to remain detached in his macro-views of China, Peter Van Ness who felt betrayed by the Sino-US normalization and reform in China in his pursuit of a just world without imperialism, Thomas Heberer who fulfills his quest for local agency for change by pragmatic filed research that ends his Marxist idealism, and Leo Lee whose diasporic identity replaced participation in the radical years by extricating transcendental globalism from those narratives considered socially rotten. This paper argues that the place and the time they conducted the China studies affect their strategies of adjustment.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 50(3), 1-27
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    50-3-1.pdf1749KbAdobe PDF2380View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback