 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46198535
Online Users : 492
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95781
|
| Title: | 權力與抵抗：泰國「國家—高山民族」關係的探析 |
| Other Titles: | Power and Resistance: Analyzing the Changing Relations between the State and the Tribal Peoples in Thailand |
| Authors: | 蕭文軒;顧長永
Hsiao, Wen-Hsuan;Ku, Samuel C. Y. |
| Keywords: | 權力;論述;森林住民;山民;泰族特性
power;discourse;chao pa;chao khao;Thai-ness |
| Date: | 2011-12 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-09 17:02:22 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 1648 年西發里亞條約簽訂後，「領土律令」成為主權國家的一項基本原理。可是，像泰國這樣的東南亞國家，在劃定政治空間以後，卻未能完全地控制邊界。在邊界地帶，中央政府的政治權力相當虛弱，而且，容易遭遇挑戰。冷戰時期，泰國政府因認知到共產主義威脅，而將邊界地帶的高山民族納入國家統合的議程中。為有效地對邊界地帶的高山民族進行統治，且主張統治的正當性，泰國官方創造出一套關於高山民族的論述體系，使得「山民」成為泰國北部高山民族的一種身分識別的負面標籤。泰國政府持續地把焦點放在「山民問題」的解決，使得這種負面的刻板印象深植在泰國社會中。然而，隨著共產主義威脅的消褪，泰國政治邁向民主化發展，跨境區域\\r 經濟合作的興起，這些轉變對國家和高山民族的關係有何影響呢？本文認為，像泰國這樣的開發中國家，因為市民社會尚未完全成熟，高山民族參與政治活動的機會仍遭受嚴重限制，即使官方展現出朝向多元文化主義發展的趨勢，因為支配國家的主體族群，仍掌握論述創造、政策制定及立法等相關權力，從而在國家和高山民族的關係上，依然占據著優勢的地位。
Since 1648, territorial imperative has become a basic principle of the modern sovereign nation-state system. With the emergence of modern nationstates in peninsular Southeast Asia in the post-colonial era, however, those states’ writ still fails to extend to the borderland. During the Cold War period, the central government of Thailand perceived Communism as a threat to Southeast Asia, thus necessary to integrate the highlanders into a territorially bounded nation. For effective ruling, the term chao khao（hill tribe peoples）was used by the Thai government to refer to the minority ethnic groups in Northern Thailand. Within the discourse of chao khao, there are several negative and stereotypical images towards minority ethnic groups, such as “forest destroyers”, “migrants of the mountains”, “opium producers”, etc. Can the state exert control over the borderlands as globalization prevails since the early 1980s? This article examines the changing relations between the state and the minority ethnic groups in Thailand. We argue that even though the Thai government has recognized the politics of diversity, the state still has dominated the state- minority ethnic groups relations because the state authorized its power over discourse-constructing, policy-making, and law-making. |
| Relation: | 問題與研究, 50(4), 89-132
Issues & studies |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 50-4-4.pdf | | 3514Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 386 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
