 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47777563
Online Users : 477
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96733
|
| Title: | 金融監理機關財政獨立之法制研究 |
| Other Titles: | A Study on the Law and System Governing Budget Independence in the Financial Supervision Commission |
| Authors: | 蕭文生
Hsiao, Wen-Sheng |
| Keywords: | 行政院金融監督管理委員會;獨立機關;財政獨立;監理年費;規費;特別公課;檢查費 |
| Date: | 2008-02 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-20 10:44:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 二○○四年七月一日行政院金融監督管理委員會正式揭牌運作，開啟我國金融督管理制度之新紀元。除以單一機關來統合銀行、證券、期貨與保險等金融業之發展政策與事權，達成金融監理一元化之目標外，更希望取法獨立機關運作之模式，使行政院金融監督管理委員會能夠免於政治力之干預，超然中立，依法行使職權。為實現此項目的，除傳統組織、人事及職權行使獨立性之保障外，財政獨立係新引進之保障，使監理機關享有獨立財源，更進一步保障職權行使之獨立性。為達成財政獨立，行政院金融監理委員會組織法第六條第一項規定，為辦理監督及管理業務，該會得向受監理之機關收取監理年費；第二項規定，辦理金融檢查業務得向受檢機構收取檢查費，使主管機關有較充裕之經費，得以聘用足夠人力，進行與金融監理制度相關之研究，提升金融監理之品質。此外，為使金融監理體制之經費免於匱乏，行政院金融監理委員會組織法第七條規定設立金融監督管理基金，其收入來源除政府依預算法程序之撥款外，另有監理年費、檢查費、特許費等行政規費，支應金融監理部分特定用途，例如推動金融監理人員訓練等。\\r收取監理年費與檢查費乃是我國法制上少見的情形，其憲法上之合法性問題，法律上之性質、其與租稅、規費、特別公課與受益費之區別，收取之範圍、繳納方式、救濟途徑等，皆是我國法制上的新興課題。\\r本文之目的係檢討現行行政院金融監理委員會之法制是否符合財政獨立性之要求，並分析為保障財政獨立性所收取之費用是否合憲。
In order to resolve the problem of overlapping authority due to the multiple supervisory systems for insurance, securities, and banking, the Executive Yuan designated the "Organic Act Establishing the Financial Supervisory Commission, Executive Yuan” as the foundation of a single vertically integrated system so as to solidify the business operations of financial institutions, maintain financial stability, and facilitate the development of financial markets. The Act was passed by the Legislative Yuan and promulgated by the President on July 23, 2003. The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) was then set up on July 1, 2004 as a single financial regulator that consolidates the functions of monitoring and rule-setting for the banking, securities, futures, and insurance industries, and also carries out cross-sector financial examinations. The FSC is an independent commission and has financial independence. The FSC oversees institutions’ collection practices and supervises and inspects contributions, fees, Sonderabgabe and expenses. The aim of of this article is to discuss the stipulations concerning the financial independence of the FSC and the nature of its self-critical supervisory functions and inspection fees within the constitutional framework. |
| Relation: | 法學評論, 101, 1-57 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101(1-57).pdf | | 747Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 265 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
