English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111314/142224 (78%)
Visitors : 48350733      Online Users : 785
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96739


    Title: 競爭法主管機關作為獨立行政機關之憲政組織定位及其正當法律程序─日本公平交易委員會之發展經驗與啟示
    Other Titles: Constitutional Status and Due Process of Law for Competition Law Authority as Aan Independent Administrative Commission– Experience from Japan’s Fair Trade Commission
    Authors: 黃銘傑
    Huang, Ming-jye
    Keywords: 公平交易委員會;司法審查;正當法律程序;行政委員會;政府失靈;獨立行政機關;準司法機關;實則證據法則;競爭法;權力分立
    Date: 2008-06
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 11:16:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以日本公平交易委員會之相關規範及實務運作為中心，首先探討行政委員會之組織定位與行政權間之關係，分析就權力分立原則與制衡理念而言，被置於行政權下但卻可不受其指揮監督而得獨立行使職權之行政委員會，是否有違現行憲政體制規範理念。其次，進一步深究行政委員會之獨立性，並非僅僅針對與行政部門之關係而言，亦應同時關切其與立法及司法部門間之互動問題。對於如此不受三權指揮監督、時而被稱為沒有首長之第四權的獨立機關，對其權力之制衡，應嚴格基於正當法律程序理念，要求其權限行使應符合嚴謹的程序規範，方足以取得正當地位。日本獨占禁止法就其公平交易委員會審判程序之設計、審判官獨立、中立性之規範以及程序正義之維持，司法部門時而藉由判決闡述其對該會應有正當程序作為之看法等等，在在皆訴說著行政委員會得以獨立行使職權之規範，並不足以為憂；可懼的是，對其權限行使應符合之程序規範，完全沒有概念，從而未能加以適當規範。
    In Taiwan, the status of administrative commissions in the government as a whole is still not clear. How should administrative commissions interact with other branches of the government? Does their independence from the executive branch conflict with the ideas of the separation of powers and checks-and-balances? This Aarticle, while borrowdrawing upon experienccases from Japan’s Fair Trade Commission, tries to make clear that the current organizational designs, procedural requirements, and enforcement mechanisms of Taiwan’s administrative commissions are constitutionally questionable. At the same time, this Aarticle makes someoffers several suggestions to improve the above-stated questionable organizational designs, procedural requirements, and enforcement mechanisms, in order to make them conform to the requirements of due process of law, thereby enabling the judicial branch help improve the present situation by strengthening its judicial review process.
    Relation: 法學評論, 103, 63-107
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    103(063-107).pdf915KbAdobe PDF2494View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback