政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96775
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109952/140887 (78%)
造访人次 : 46335199      在线人数 : 1402
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96775


    题名: 刑事被告本人之閱卷權——歐洲法與我國法發展之比較與評析
    其它题名: The Defendant’s Right of Direct Access to Case Files in Criminal Proceedings
    作者: 林鈺雄
    Lin, Yu-Hsiung
    关键词: 閱卷權;接觸卷證權;公平審判原則;聽審原則;歐洲人權法院
    Right of Access to Files;Right to a Fair Trial;Principle of Equality of Arms;European Court of Human Rights
    日期: 2009-08
    上传时间: 2016-05-20 15:35:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 以控訴制度為架構原則的刑事訴訟制度中，被告的主體地位能否落實，相當程度取決於其能否實質、有效行使辯護權利，而資訊地位優劣則是辯護有效與否的關鍵環節。因此賦予被告閱卷權，即賦予其檢閱卷宗並獲悉卷內資訊的權利，係為達成公平審判所不可或缺之權利保障。然而，猶如其他程序權利，閱卷權也非毫無限制的絕對權利，如何限制方不致背離公平審判原則，向來為閱卷權的焦點所在。在相關爭議中，歐洲人權法院的案例法，已逐漸成為歐洲各內國法的共通基準，其中，德國法百年來關於限制被告本人閱卷的立法基點與實務立場，亦順應歐洲法的發展潮流，大幅修法以資因應。回到我國法制，刑事訴訟法於二○○七年七月雖增訂第三十三條第二項有關無辯護人之被告閱卷權之規定，然此規定是否已達閱卷權的最低限度保障？是否符合武器平等的要求？皆值得進一步探討。本文以刑事被告本人之閱卷權為研究主題，先從比較法出發，分別評析歐洲人權法院裁判及德國立法、實務及學說的發展，並進而檢討我國相關新舊法、實務及學說，最後並簡述立法建議。
    The right of the accused to access case files lies at the heart of the notion of a fair procedure. However, it can be limited in order to protect the purpose of the investigation and the privacy of others. This study is primarily devoted to a discussion of the defendant’s right of direct access to court files. What is at stake is whether restricting the right to inspect the files to a defendant’s lawyer is compatible with the principle of a fair trial or not. Regarding to this issue, the case law of the Euro-pean Court of Human Rights has become the common standard in Eu-rope. Among them, German law, which limited the defendant’s right of direct access to files over the past 100 years, has been amended in order to adapt to the new development in European law. This paper also re-views the relevant law and its judicial realization in Taiwan and finally makes a legislative proposal.
    關聯: 法學評論, 110, 213-276
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    110(213-276).pdf2461KbAdobe PDF23406检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈