English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25724523      Online Users : 319
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96777


    Title: 積欠工資墊償制度所涉及的三個問題——從最高行政法院九十四年裁字第二五六五號裁定談起
    Other Titles: Three Problems of the Arrear Wage Payment FundMentions from the Decision of the Highest Administrative Court, year 94 cai-zhe 2565th
    Authors: 劉士豪
    Liu, Shih-Hao
    Keywords: 積欠工資墊償基金;勞動基準法;勞工;工資;積欠工資墊償基金提繳及墊償管理辦法;行政訴訟法;民事訴訟法;公法;私法;監察人
    The Arrear Wage Payment Fund;the Labor Standards Act;Employee;Wage;Regulations for the Management;Repayment;Collection and Allocation of the Arrear Wage;Code of Public Procedure;Code of Civil Procedure;Public Law;Private Law;Supervisors
    Date: 2009-10
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 15:36:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 最高行政院九十四年度裁字第二五六五號裁定是關於一件向勞工保險局申請積欠工資熱償的案件。由於申請案被勞保局核定不予墊償,這個最高行政法院裁定的核心問題雖然是「勞保局對於申請積欠墊償核定」之性質,但整個案件經過周折甚多,主要是積欠工資墊償制度值得爭議的地方很多:由於積欠工資墊償制度是一公私法混合的規範,發生該法律之爭議究竟應提起行政訴訟還是民事訴訟?再則積欠工資墊償制度,本身就是爭議不斷下所產生的規範,其規定涉及的行政院勞工委員會、中央勞工保險局、勞工及事業單位的雇主,各方之間的關係又錯綜複雜,制度中那一部分是公法關係?那一部分是私法關係?值得進一步討論。最後是本案原始爭論的實體問題,就是勞工若兼具監察人身分,到底能不能申請積欠工資墊償?
    The decision of year 94 character decision No. 2565 from the highest administrative court refers to the case which applies to the labor insurance bureau. The Applier applies for arrear wage payment, but the labor insurance bureau refuses the application, because the applier is not only an employee but also a Supervisor in the company. The key question of the decision of the highest administrative court is although the nature of the decision by the labor insurance bureau, which refused to recompense the arrear wages. It concerns several disputed laws, because the system of The Arrear Wage Payment Fund is combined by public law and private law. Shall an employee seek public procedure or civil procedure, when an employee files a lawsuit about the application of arrear wages? Another dispute concerns the relations between the Arrear Wage Payment Fund and employers and employees. Do the different relations belong to the jurisdiction of public law or private law? The final question is the Qualification of Applier to the Arrear Wage Payment Fund. The present research attempts to resolve these three questions.
    Relation: 法學評論, 111, 185-247
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    111(185-247).pdf2012KbAdobe PDF1018View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback