English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 112721/143689 (78%)
造訪人次 : 49562481      線上人數 : 801
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96795


    題名: 科技匯流與條約解釋—— 探討「服務業特定承諾」的時代性兼評WTO中國視聽服務案
    其他題名: Technological Convergence and Treaty Interpretation: On the Modernity of the WTO/GATS Specific Commitments and the China-Audiovisual Services Case
    作者: 彭心儀
    Peng, Shin-Yi
    關鍵詞: 中國視聽服務案;線上音樂;服務貿易總協定;特定承諾表;締約當時情況;技術中立
    China-Audiovisual Services;Online Music;GATS;Specific Commitments;Circumstances of Conclusion;Technological Neutrality
    日期: 2011-04
    上傳時間: 2016-05-20 16:07:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 正如內國法總是受限於一時一地的立法格局，貿易承諾也受制於談判當時的產業條件。因此，科技發展所引發的WTO爭端案件，近年來未曾暫歇片刻。中國視聽服務案之線上音樂爭議再一次地凸顯了科技變動下的條約解釋困境。線上音樂的發展已完全顛覆傳統的配銷通路，導致音樂產業結構性的改變，倘不賦予「錄音產品配銷服務」新的時代意涵，多數會員的相關承諾將變成真空狀態。本文探討如何在談判之際，預留未來科技發展空間，讓科學本身的偶然性不減損法律的安定性，於經貿的場域架構出較為永久的立法藍圖。當承諾語言具備「充分的通用性」時，上訴機構將會填補內容，以適應新的科技與市場情勢，讓特定承諾與時俱進，由時代形塑其具體內涵。然而，將承諾內涵的張力極大化、賦予其「開放性」的立場，如果沒有更豐富的論述支撐，終究還是必須面對是否超越甚至背離當年談判內容的質疑。此外，如何推知WTO會員的「共同意思」、承諾表的解釋方法是否需要量身訂做等問題，確實值得思考。最後，一再被提出討論的「技術中立」概念，也等待上訴機構定調。
    In the context of domestic law, the issue of whether a legal text should be interpreted based on its “original meaning”, i.e., the historical language at the time the law was made, is controversial. A similar debate may arise in the regime of international trade. At the WTO, such issues may be of particular importance when dealing with technological change, as many of the products/services described in a schedule are likely to undergo significant developments over time. The dispute of China-Audiovisual Services is illustrative here. New digital technologies and the steady development of communication networks have significantly changed the shape of the international music market as well as the traditional business models of the music industry. The phenomenon of digital convergence has shown to be problematic in practice as technological changes must also affect the language used in treaties. Shall we rely on the contemporary language at the time a treaty is interpreted, or shall we employ the historical language at the time the treaty was concluded? No answer to this question is given in the Vienna Convention. In China-Audiovisual Services the Appellate Body appears to have taken a clear stance in favor of allowing for the evolution of the meaning of treaty terms. The AB considered that the terms used in China’s GATS Schedule are sufficiently generic that what they apply to may change over time. In this respect, the AB noted that GATS Schedules constitute multilateral treaties with continuing obligations that WTO Members entered into for an indefinite period of time. This paper argues that the interpretation of schedules of commitments poses important challenges to the interpreter. Schedules are not as multilateral as treaties, and to some extent schedules may not represent the common intentions of all WTO Members in a similar way as the rest of the covered agreements. The author also concludes that the unresolved issue of technological neutrality should be addressed via the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.
    關聯: 法學評論, 120, 1-48
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    120(1-48).pdf1035KbAdobe PDF2218檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋