English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50913574      Online Users : 216
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96847


    Title: 讀韓非子〈解老〉和〈喻老〉
    Other Titles: Reading Hanfeize`s "Interpreting the Laoze" and "Clarifying the Laoze"
    Authors: 熊鐵基
    Xiong, Tie-Ji
    Keywords: 韓非子;解老;喻老;老子;道
    Hanfeize;Interpreting the Laoze;Clarifying the Laoze;Laoze;Doctrine
    Date: 2007-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-23 14:27:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 〈解老〉、〈喻老〉是目前所知最早的《老子》注，而本文論述的重點在於：一、韓非當時所見到的《老子》版本是何面貌無法得知，只能斷定與今所見傳本不同。二、肯定老子的道論是韓非學說理論基礎，其關於道與德之關係解釋比《老子》詳細清晰，不過，韓非的道所指就是「一」，所謂執一、用一皆如此，顯然與老子「道生一」不同，後人仍可在這兩說發揮。三、韓非援道入法，書中提到「道生法」之說，但似乎沒有明確對道如何生法作解釋，因此，如何理解道生法，仍是一值得繼續探討的問題。四、〈解老〉、〈喻老〉明確展現對老子尊重態度，超越其他諸子。
    “Interpreting the Laoze” and “Clarifying the Laoze” are the earliest remarks on 《Laoze》 we know. This article has its points in 1. As there is no way to know what the version of 《Laoze》 Hanfei had available was about, all we know for sure is that it is not the version we have access to this day. 2. Agreeing with Laoze’s doctrine is what makes the Hanfei theory firmly founded and it delivers a clearer view of the relationship between doctrine and virtue than《Laoze》. Only Hanfei’s doctrine is about 1. The so-called carrying out 1 and implementing 1 are 2 know examples. This makes it clear that Hanfeize’s doctrine is different from 1 comes from the doctrine claimed by Laoze, leaving the same an issue to explore the 2 schools. 3. In Hanfei’s carrying the doctrine into the rule, it is claimed that the rule originates from the doctrine, though there are no clear explanation on how the rule comes from the doctrine. Consequently, it remains an issue to discuss how to explain the fact that the rule comes from the doctrine. 4. Both “Interpreting the Laoze” and “Clarifying the Laoze” have shown much more respect to Laoze than all other renown scholars.
    Relation: 政大中文學報, 8, 15-28
    Bulletin of the Department of Chinese Literature National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大中文學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    8(15-28).pdf656KbAdobe PDF22271View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback