English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 117581/148612 (79%)
造訪人次 : 69758512      線上人數 : 536
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97299


    題名: 二十世紀後期中美儒學的正統異端論述
    其他題名: Chinese and North American Confucian Discourses
    作者: 詹康
    Chan, Kang
    關鍵詞: 道統;異端;當代新儒家;牟宗三;錢穆;杜維明
    orthodoxy;John B. Henderson;heresy;Wm. Theodore de Bary;twentieth-century Confucianism;John B. Henderson;Mou Tsung-san;Ch’ien Mu;Tu Wei-ming
    日期: 2002-05
    上傳時間: 2016-06-02 11:55:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 道統觀的建立、維護與異端的指認、辯駁，是世界許多學派、宗教共有的現象，儒家也不例外。在二十世紀後半期的儒學論述中，對道統觀的態度可至少分為三種：一、將道統觀史學化，即以宋明道統觀研究宋明儒學，其後果為道統觀在現代儒學建構中缺席。二、將道統觀現代化，使道統觀在現代儒學建構中的重要地位和功能，和宋明儒學的情形可相比擬。三、提出另類道統觀以取代宋明道統觀，此一新道統觀不至像宋明道統觀那般無比重要，但也取得新的功能，適應現代發展的需求。本文舉出了狄百瑞 (Wm. T. de Bary)、John B. Henderson、牟宗三、錢穆、杜維明等學者，做為前述三種論述之代表，詳細討論他們的學術思想，並嘗試指出各家得失之所在。結論部份則從發展策略的角度解釋三種道統論述的差異，及討論儒家與政治的關係。
    The construction of orthodoxy and heresy is common to many schools and religions in the world, including Confucianism. This practice, predominant in neo-Confucianism from the twelfth to the sixteenth century, began to meet objections in the seventeenth century. As a development from the ambivalence in the past three centuries, modern 　　　Confucian discourse since 1950 harbors at least three orientations to the orthodoxy-heresy distinction: i) to reserve the orthodoxy-heresy distinction in historiography, i.e., studying neo-Confucianism through its own conceptions of orthodoxy and heresy, while making no use of them in constructing modern Confucian theory; ii) to update the neo-Confucian conceptions of orthodoxy and heresy with substantial alterations, attributing to them an importance equal to that to neo-Confucianism; and iii) to replace the neo-Confucian conceptions with an alternative set of distinction, functional to modern needs while less crucial to modern theory building. I thoroughly discussed the ideas of Wm. Theodore de Bary, John B. Henderson, Mou Tsung-san 牟宗三, Ch’ien Mu 錢穆, Tu Wei-ming 杜維明 and other scholars, who are taken as representatives of the three orientations mentioned above. The concluding section is an attempt to understand the differences among these three orientations from the their own strategic assumptions. It also briefly touches on the relationship between modern Confucian thinkers and politics.
    關聯: 政治大學歷史學報, 19, 121-258
    The Journal of History
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政治大學歷史學報 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2860檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋