政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/97994
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 97106/127750 (76%)
造访人次 : 33275921      在线人数 : 342
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97994


    题名: 「合理」的懷疑?——以女性主義法學觀點檢視性侵害 審判之偏見
    其它题名: What Constitutes Reasonable Doubt? A Feminist's Perspective on Taiwanese Rape Trials
    作者: 林志潔;金孟華
    Lin, Chih-Chieh;Chin, Mong-Hwa
    关键词: 女性主義法學;性侵害;判決研究;性別刻板印象
    Feminist Jurisprudence;Rape;Verdict Study;Gender Stereotyping
    日期: 2012-06
    上传时间: 2016-06-17 12:01:15 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文擬透過女性主義法學的觀點來檢視我國之性侵害判決。刑法妨害性自主罪章修法至今已過十年,惟基於被害人隱私等因素,司法院無法公開性侵害犯罪之判決供大眾檢索。因此,過去性侵害判決研究一向是學界所難以進入的研究領域,相關研究多是針對被害人進行個案研究,少有針對審判者提出建言者。此外,該次修法雖然是由女權團體所主導,但是過去十年卻少見有從女性主義法學的角度檢討修法的論述。本文藉由國科會以及司法院的協助,獲許可瀏覽司法院資料庫中所有的性侵害判決,除了藉此機會檢討當年修法精神有無貫徹在實務見解中,更希望能收拋磚引玉之效,引起學界對此議題的重視。\r 在結構上,本文共分為四大部分,除前言外,第二部分是理論基礎的建構;第三部分則提供我國法院判決之判決資料,檢驗是否有不當之論述內容;第四部分則為結語。
    This article examines rape trials from the perspective of feminist jurisprudence. Due to privacy concerns, it has long been the policy of the Taiwanese Judicial Yuan to deny the public access to the verdicts of rape trials. Despite the good intentions of the Judicial Yuan, the policy also prevented the courts from outside scrutiny. In 1999, under the pressure of women’s rights groups, the Taiwanese Legislature amended the rape law. The new law was designed to conform to the ideals of feminist movements in Taiwan. Due to the privacy restriction, although it has been more than ten years since the major amendment of the Criminal Law Statute, the legal academia knows little about the new law’s impact on women’s rights. With the assistance of the National Science Council and help from the Judicial Yuan, I was granted permission to gain access to the official verdict database. It is my intention to use this opportunity to review whether the courts have fulfilled their obligation, under the law, to create an environment of gender equality and to diminish the use of unfair gender stereotypes. This article is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction; the second part provides the theoretical basis used to review court verdicts; the third part is an analysis of the court verdicts; and the final part is the conclusion.
    關聯: 法學評論, 127,117-166頁
    Chengchi law review
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    127(117-166).pdf1207KbAdobe PDF282检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈