English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49545954      Online Users : 966
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98006


    Title: 對「專家學者組成委員會所為決定之司法審查」——以委員會之運作與資訊審查為中心
    Other Titles: A Study of Judicial Review, as Conducted by Delegated Committees outside of Authority, with a Focus on Its Process Operation and Information Review
    Authors: 黃源銘
    Huang, Yuan-Ming
    Keywords: 專家;學者;委員會;不確定法律概念;判斷餘地;效率;專業;技術;環境影響評估委員會;民主正當性
    Expert;Scholar;Committee;Indefinite law;Administrative Area of Judgment;Efficiency;Professionalism;Technique;Committee of Environmental Impact Assessment;Justice of Democracy
    Date: 2012-10
    Issue Date: 2016-06-17 16:07:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由於行政的專業化與技術化，國家在面對多元社會的轉變，常會引進專家學者參與行政事務之決定，因而有行政機關內部委員會之設立。此等委員會之決定通常即代表行政機關，由於本身具有高度的專業性與技術性，其所作之決定在面對司法審查時究竟審查密度為何？攸關人民權利的保障。本文試圖從專家學者組成之委員會之定義、類型與必要性作介紹，進而探討司法如何對委員會的決定作審查，並聚焦於委員會的程序運作與資訊審查，其中涉及不確定法律概念與判斷餘地等行政法學概念，並以近日我國行政法院判決事涉委員會運作的案例作為分析評述的參考並提出本文之觀察結論。
    Faced with diversified development and a professional-oriented trend in society, current administrative authority tends to adopt more external professional opinion on public affairs to improve performance. The delegated committees, outside of the Authority, have been constituted. Though the members are all equipped with highly professional expertise, the concern of adequate density of the review has arisen since the agreement obtained has a profound impact on the interest of the people. In this research, the author tries to define the concept of the delegated committee from outside authority, how will it be formed, and other corresponding legal issues. Further focus is made on the process operation of the committees and the information review conducted, especially under the concept of indefinite law and administrative area of judgment. The author also adopts a case study on recent verdicts for analysis. Combining the literature review with practical analyses, the author provides further conclusions and suggestions.
    Relation: 法學評論, 129,167-243頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    129-3.pdf1194KbAdobe PDF2319View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback