 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46081644
Online Users : 1140
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98131
|
| Title: | 從國際法觀點分析中日東海大陸礁層劃界爭端解決之途徑 |
| Other Titles: | Analysis on Dispute Settlement between the People’s Republic of China (P.R.C.) and Japan Regarding the Delimitation of Continental Shelf in the East China Sea: Perspective of International Law |
| Authors: | 詹勇銘
Chan, Yung-ming |
| Keywords: | 東海;大陸礁層;沖繩海槽;釣魚台列嶼;艾默里報告;自然延伸原則;衡平原則;等距離線／中間線;共同開發
East China Sea;continental shelf;Okinawa Through;Diaoyu Tai Islands;Emery Report;principle of natural prolongation;equitable principle;equidistance line/median line;joint development |
| Date: | 2011-01 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-06-21 09:50:08 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 東海位於中國大陸、日本及韓國之間，係由韓國、日本、中國大陸及台灣所包圍之「半封閉海」（semi-enclosed sea），其具有寬廣而平坦之大陸礁層。1969年「聯合國亞洲及遠東經濟委員會」（United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and Far East, UNECAFE）公布一份報告，指出東海大陸礁層蘊藏豐富的石油及天然氣。自此，東海主權權利歸屬開始成為周邊國家關注之議題，更引發中國大陸及日本對於東海天然資源開發活動之爭端。\\r 中、日二國間對於東海大陸礁層劃界採取之原則不同，中國大陸主張「自然延伸原則」（principle of natural prolongation）及「衡平原則」（equitable principle），日本則則主張「等距離線／等距離規則」（equidistance-line/median-line rule）。對此，本文將自國際法上有關海域劃界的基本原則、國際公約之相關規定、國際司法機構判決理由與各國實踐，分析中、日雙方對於東海大陸礁層劃界之主張。 截至目前為止，中、日二國針對東海問題已進行十一輪雙邊協商，足以凸顯兩國對於大陸礁層劃界爭端獲得最終解決的重視與急迫性。是以，本文將說明中日雙方於歷次協商中所獲致之具體成果，藉此推論出中、日雙方所達成的共識與所遭遇的困境，並將於文末分析雙方應透過何
The East China Sea where is surrounded by the People’s Republic of China (P.R.C.), the Republic of China (Taiwan), Japan and Korea is a semi-enclosed sea. On 1969, the United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and Far East (UNECAFE) published a research report, which pointed out that the continental shelf in the East China Sea is abounded with oil and natural gas. Since that time, neighboring states have been having disputes over the sovereign rights of the East China Sea, particularly the dispute over the exploration and exploitation of natural resources between the P.R.C. and Japan. The P.R.C. and Japan have always been taking conflicting positions on the delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea. As far as this issue is concerned, the P.R.C. claimed the principles of natural prolongation and equitable solution while Japan argued the equidistance-line/median-line rule. In this article, the two states’ viewpoints about the delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea from perspectives of general principles of maritime delimitation, provisions of relevant international treaties, judicial decisions and state practices will be examined. Moreover, during 2004 and 2007, the P.R.C. and Japan had convened eleven bilateral round-table talks named “Consultations on the Issues of the East China Sea,” which highlighted the two states’ desirability of definite settlement of the dispute over the delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea. Accordingly, this article will elaborate specific outcomes achieved by the P.R.C. and Japan through bilateral consultations so as to conclude the consensus the two states have made and the difficulties the two states have faced. In the end of this article, it will also be analyzed how the disputes of the East China Sea between the two states could be finally resolved from the perspective of international law. |
| Relation: | 國際關係學報, 31, 151-236
Journal of international relations |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際關係學報] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 31(p151-236).pdf | | 919Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1209 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
