English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49593811      Online Users : 420
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 東亞研究 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/99220


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99220


    Title: 西方不在西邊：西方主義的自我認識方法
    Other Titles: The West That is not Western:Self-identification in the Oriental Modernity
    Authors: 石之瑜;謝明珊
    Shih, Chih-Yu;Hsieh, Ming-Shan
    Keywords: 東方主義;西方主義;天下觀;神道;自我;對象
    Orientalism;Occidentalism;Under-Heaven;Shinto;Self;Other
    Date: 2008-07
    Issue Date: 2016-07-20 15:53:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 1970年代末期，薩伊德（Edward W. Said）在東方主義（Orientalism）一書中，批評普遍主義對差異的不尊重，這個批評也可以用來批評主流社會科學界，亦即藉由把東方描述為一個特殊且落後的對象，來凸顯自身的普遍性與先進，並延伸出改造東方的責任。本文辯稱這樣的批判仍陷入「自我－對象」的認識框架下，藉由考察中國與日本的思想史，發現不論在現代性加入之前還是之後，中國的天下觀與日本神道觀，都不靠與對象的差異來進行自我認識，也沒有賦予自身改造他人的責任，反而是透過自我修養與砥礪來超越差異。
    This paper will discuss the concept of “the West.” It will argue that for the Japanese and Chinese thinkers, the West does not exist in the West. Rather, the West is sometimes at the periphery and at other times, at the center. For them, “the Chinese” is about the epistemology of all-under-heaven. There is no such concept as “Other” in this epistemology. As a result, the modern Western thinkers depend on opposing the concrete, historical, yet backward “Other” to pretend being universal, while the Chinese and the Japanese thinkers concentrate on self-rectification to compete for the best representative of “the Chinese.” The Chinese is no more than an epistemological frame that divides the world into the center and the periphery. During modern times, the Japanese accepted Japan being at the periphery, while the West is at the center. To practice self-rectification is to simulate the West. The West is therefore not geographical Western, but at the center of the Japanese selfhood. Self-knowledge produced through Othering and that through self-rectification are so different that the universal West could not make sense of the all-under-heaven way of conceptualizing the West.
    Relation: 東亞研究, 39(2), 1-32
    East Asia Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[東亞研究] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    39(2)p1-32.pdf891KbAdobe PDF2977View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback