English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90029/119959 (75%)
Visitors : 24036542      Online Users : 206
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/113495
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113495


    Title: 主管職務圖利罪之罪質與犯罪結構的分析反省
    A Legal Dogmatic Study on Paragraph Structure of Abuse of Public Power for Private Profit
    Authors: 許恒達
    Hsu, Heng-Da
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 圖利;公務員;賄賂;濫權;對向犯;獲得利益;misuse of public power for private profit;public officer;bribery;public malfeasance;correspondence offense;profit-gaining
    misuse of public power for private profit;public officer;bribery;public malfeasance;correspondence offense;profit-gaining
    Date: 2014-09
    Issue Date: 2017-10-11 11:56:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文討論貪污治罪條例第6條第4款公務員主管職務圖利罪(基本要件同於刑法第131條,以下簡稱圖利罪)的解釋問題,包括其法益內涵、侵害方式、構成要件的定性,以及獲得利益結果的各項解釋,討論中將尤其著重在最高法院對本罪提出的三項見解「圖利罪屬各類貪污罪名概括規定」、「獲得淨利為本罪結果」、「圖利罪屬對向犯」,筆者將透過法益概念與犯罪結構的實質解釋,主張:一、圖利罪非各類貪污罪名的概括規定,而屬刑法瀆職型犯罪的一種,其成罪結構不同於賄賂罪,並應在其客觀要件納入「致生財產損害」的實質要素。二、圖利罪的得利結果不必獲得淨利,只要有利得即足。三、圖利罪非對向犯,獲利一方亦可成立共同犯罪。
    This article aims to research on the explanation of Profit by public official in Anti-Corruption Statute (Article 6-4), including the explanation its legal interest, the way to invasion, the constitutive requirements, and profit gaining. The research will focus on three opinion raised by Supreme Court: "profit by public official is a general provision of corruption crimes", "the outcome of the crime is net profit", and "profit by the public official is a kind of correspondence offense". This article claims that: 1. Profit by public officer is not a general provision of corruption crimes but a crime belongs to malfeasance. 2. Not only profit-gaining but also property-damaging constitute the punishment grounds of this crime. 3. Profit by public official is not a correspondence offense. The man who gains earnings constitutes complicity.
    Relation: 台大法學論叢, Vol.43, No.3, pp.719-769
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199%2fNTULJ.2014.43.03.04
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2014.43.03.04
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    719769.pdf957KbAdobe PDF147View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback