English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47880599      Online Users : 922
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116069


    Title: 國小探究式資訊素養課程發展之行動研究 -以嘉義大學附設實驗國民小學為例
    Action research onInquiry-based information literacy curriculum development in elementary school – a case study in Affiliated Experimental Elementary School of National Chiayi University
    Authors: 龔冰蕾
    Gong, Bing Lei
    Contributors: 楊美華
    Yang, Mei Hwa
    龔冰蕾
    Gong, Bing Lei
    Keywords: 探究式學習
    國小資訊素養課程
    Big6模式
    Super3模式
    Inquiry-based learning
    Information literacy curriculum in elementary school
    Big6 model
    Super3 model
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-03-02 11:47:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 研究者為具有圖書館專業的國小教師,因為負責教授「圖書館利用課」,而在教學現場發現:國小學童需要一套完整的課程,來學習運用資訊解決問題的能力。於是和共同關注此議題的教師同儕、合作教授,一起發展「國小探究式資訊素養課程」。
      本研究旨在發展國小探究式資訊素養課程的目標、課程綱要與教材,並探討探究式學習在國小資訊素養課的應用,以及授課教師面臨的困境和挑戰。本研究採取適合教育現場解決問題的行動研究法,研究工具包括「認識自己使用資訊的習慣」學生問卷、「學校資訊素養課程實施情形之意見調查」教師問卷、期末學生與家長的課程回饋問卷。也以兩次半結構式訪談法蒐集資料。另以多項課程發展歷程檔案進行文件分析。
      研究結果顯示:一、課程的目標是:培養學生能夠依據自己的需求和興趣,有效的蒐集、評估和使用資訊,成為有自主學習能力的終生學習者。為達成此目標,則課程綱要會因應科技的進步而變動。二、課程發展出一到六年級的教材,且各年級學習任務手冊的教材設計,發展的是培養能力的鷹架,主題材料可隨需要置換。教材均於「資訊素養教學資源平台」(http://ilr.etech.ncyu.edu.tw)分享。三、課程的教學法關注學童的四大關鍵能力:「會問問題」、「找得到資訊」、「讀得懂資訊」、「能解決問題」,研究結果發展出培養這四大關鍵能力的教學步驟或教學方向。四、授課教師面臨的困境是:1.花費很多時間2.缺乏師資培育;挑戰是:1.沒有一定的教材教法2.需要綜合的學科能力,語文能力特別重要。
      本研究建議:一、培養國小學童的資訊素養,應以跨領域的協同合作或融入學科的探究式學習為主。二、操作Big6或Super3要給予不同程度的鷹架,做不同程度的要求。三、國小教師培養學童的資訊素養,宜參考「資訊素養教學資源平台」。四、強化國小學生將電腦 、網路做為學習工具的概念。五、成立「國小探究式資訊素養課程」策略聯盟。六、師資培育應培養教師良好的資訊素養。
      The author is an elementary school teacher with a professional librarianship background. This study initially originated from a course instructed by the author in Affiliated Experimental Elementary School of National Chiayi University (AEESNCU), entitled ‘How to Use the Library’. It is discovered that an curriculum is required to cultivate children’s ability of using information to solve problems. Therefore, the ‘Inquiry-Based Information Literacy (IBIL) Curriculum in Elementary School’ was developed by the author and together with a group of colleagues, including a cooperative professor from National Chiayi University, who are all concerned about this topic.

      The purpose of this study is three-fold. First, we tried to develop both the target and guidelines of the IBIL curriculum. Secondly, we developed the textbook of the IBIL curriculum and the fundamental framework for inquiry-based learning. Thirdly, we explored the difficulties and challenges of the course instructors. This is an action research, which is well suited to solve problems for educational scene. The research instruments included three kinds of questionnaires, and inviting different teachers to participate in a half-structured interviews for two times. Besides, several files of developmental procedure were analyzed.

      The results showed that, 1. Curriculum guidelines should be adjusted with the improvement of technology, since the target of curriculum is to equip children with the ability to collect, evaluate and use information efficiently according to their own requirements and interests. 2.Textbooks were developed for G1-6, while the inquiry-based learning handbooks is designed to serve as a scaffold for learning, and the subject is changeable whenever necessary. All textbooks and handbooks are available on the following website: http://ilr.etech.ncyu.edu.tw. 3. The inquiry-based learning focuses on four key abilities: seeking a good question to explore, knowing where to reach suitable and correct information, comprehending the information, and knowing how to exploit information to solve problems. The results of this study include step-by-step instructions for cultivating the four key abilities, and tips for teachers to provide instructions. 4. For course instructors, the difficulties are: It costs too much time prior, within, and after the course, and also lacks teacher’s information literacy training., On the other hand, the challenges are: there are no standardized answers while teaching and learning; and cross-discipline abilities are also required. Finally, the language ability is the most important one among all the challenges.

      In conclusions, 1. To cultivate the information literacy of elementary school students, it is recommended to collaborate with cross-discipline instructors or integrate inquiry learning into elementary curriculum. 2. While using the Big6 model or the Super3 model, different scaffolds should be provided and different levels of requirement should be requested.
    3. Cultivation of information literacy among students could be facilitated via the materials from the following website: http://ilr.etech.ncyu.edu.tw.
    4. Reinforce the concept of regarding computers and internet as good learning tools among students. 5. Construct a strategic alliance of the IBIL curriculum in elementary school. 6. Teacher’s information literacy should also be trained.
    Reference: 一、 中文書目
    ETNEWS(2014)。遠見/2014年全民閱讀大調查國人每月讀1.7本
       書。檢自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20141016/409873.htm?t
    王子懿(1994)。應用庫爾梭的研究方法探索讀者在資訊搜尋過程中
       認知、感覺與行動的演變。台北:私立淡江大學教育資料科學
       研究所碩士論文。
    王文科,王智弘(2014)。教育研究法。台北:台灣五南圖書出版股
       份有限公司,2014。
    行政院主計處與行政院青年輔導委員會合作 99 年青少年狀況調查
       (2010)。青少年政策白皮書。表 4-1 臺灣地區 15-29 歲青少
       年經常從事的休閒活動,102。
    李德竹(2000)。資訊素養的意義、內涵與演變。圖書與資訊學刊, 
       35,1-25。
    吳美美(1996)。課程改革和資訊素養教育。社教雙月刊,74,32-39
    林美和(1996)。資訊素養與終身學習的關係。社教雙月刊,73,7-12
    林佳旺(2005)。國小六年級網路素養課程系統化教學設計之行動研究。 
       教學科技與媒體,71,47-60。
    林敏淑(2006)。Big6教學模式融入社會領域教科書教學之行動研究- 
       -以國小四年級為例。花蓮:國立花蓮教育大學社會科教學碩 
       士論文。
    林菁(1999)。雲嘉地區國小教學資源中心現況初步調查研究。
       教學科技與媒體,43,33-43。
    林菁、洪美齡(2004)。資訊素養融入國小五年級社會學習領域—
       以選賢與能主題為例。圖書館學與資訊科學,30(1), 26-40。
    林菁(2007)。資訊素養融入國小四年級社會學習領域教學:小小古
      蹟解說員的培訓研究。教育資料與圖書館學。44(3),357-378
    林菁、郭玫叔(2012)。國小一年級資訊素養教育課程實施成效之探
    討。教育資料與圖書館學,50:1,41-74。
    林菁、陳毓彬(2013)。資訊素養評量之編製與學生表現:以國小二 
       年級為例。教育資料與圖書館學,51:1,91-129。
    林菁、張再明(2014)。國小三年級資訊素養課程成效之研究。教育
       科技與學習,2:1,35-70。
    林菁、顏仁德、黃財尉(2014)。探究式資訊素養融入課程成效之四
     年長期研究。教育資料與圖書館學,50:1,41-74。
    林菁、陳耀輝(2015)。應用爭議導向之探究式學習於資訊素養:培
       養國小五年級學生議論能力。圖書資訊學研究,9:2,67-109
    岳立容(2003)。資訊素養教學研究--以大六教學法融入高中三民主
       義課程為例。台北:國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修
       碩士班論文。
    施宏諭(2004)。嘉義市國小高年級學童使用網路遊戲與資訊能力之 
       相關研究。嘉義:國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。
    胡幼慧(1996),質性研究。台北:巨流出版社。
    范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀
       《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。 
       教育脈動電子期刊,5。
    教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題(資訊教 
       育)。檢自http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-2983,c551-1.php
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱(教育部發布版)。   
       檢自http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c6391.php?Lang  
       =zh-tw
    教育部(2016)。2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖。檢自https://depart.moe
    .edu.tw/ED2100/News.aspx?n=1353704343B62511&sms=
    2ADD120E8E2615E3
    張盡梅(2005)。資訊素養融入國小自然與生活科技領域探究「水污
       染」主題—以Big6 模式為例。未出版之,嘉義:國立嘉義
       大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。
    游婉琳(2002)。資訊素養教學之研究 : 以Big6融入國小五年級國 
       語科為例。台中:國立中興大學國書資訊研究所碩士論文。
    富邦文教基金會(2004)。2004全國青少年媒體使用行為研究調查。
       台北:富邦文教基金會。
    項聖惠(2017)。Big6模式融入國小四年級社會學習領域之行動研究   
       以「走讀臺中舊城區的糕餅產業」為例。台中:國立台中教育 
       大學區域與社會發展學系國小教師在職進修教學碩士班論文。
    歐用生(1999)。行動研究與學校教育革新。國民教育,39:5,2-12
    蔡清田(1998)。行動研究理論與「教師即研究者」取向的課程發展
       。檢自ftp://sf.csj.ks.edu.tw/pub/exam-adm/A- %A4%E5%C4m 
       %B8%EA%AE%C6/%AE%D5%AA%F8%A5D%A5%F4%BA  
       %C2%B8%D5012%A6%E6%B0%CA%AC%E3%A8s%B2z%BD
       %D7.htm
    蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。高雄市:復文出版社,P156頁。
    賴苑玲(2000)。國小實施資訊素養教育之實驗研究──以台中市國 
       小五年級學生為例。書苑季刊,45,18-38。
    賴苑玲(2001)。如何將Big Six技能融入國小課程。書苑季刊,48,25-38
    戴賢良(2005)。國小線上圖書資訊素養教材之設計與發展──以
    「書精靈王國」為例。教育資料與圖書館學,42:3,393-407

    二、英文書目
    American Association of School Librarians (AASL), & Association for
    EducationalCommunication and Technology (AECT) (1998).
    Information power:Buildingpartnerships for learning. Chicage, IL.
    American Association of School Librarians (2009). Standards for the 21st-
    century learner in action. Chicago, IL: American Association of
    School Librarians .
    American Library Association. (ALA) (1989). Final report of the American
    libraryassociation presidential committee on information literacy.
    Chicago:AmericanLibrary Association.
    Berkowitz, B.(1998).Assessment: Big6 scoring guides for diagnosis and prescription.Big6 newsletter, v1 n3 p4-5,14-15.
    Breivik, P. S. (2005). 21st century learning and information literacy.
       Change, 37(2),20-27.
    Doyle, C. S. (1992). Outcome measures for information literacy within the
    9ational Educational Goals of 1990. Final report to national forum
    on information literacy.Summary of findings. (ERIC Document
    Reproduction Service No. ED351033)
    Eisenberg, M. B. & Berkowitz, R. E.(1990).Information problem
    solving: The Big six skills approach to library & information
    skills instruction. Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Eisenberg, M. B. & Berkowitz, R. E. (1999). Teaching information &
    technology skills: The Big6 in elementary schools. Worthington,
    OH: Linworth Publishing.
    Eisenberg, M. B. & Berkowitz, R. E. (2000). Big6 and student
    achievement: report of 71 an action research study. The Big6
    collection:The best of the Big6 newsletter, p126-128. Worthington,
    OH:Linworth.
    Eisenberg, M. B. (2001). Implementing information skills: Lessons learned
    from the Big6 approach to information problem-solving.School
    Libraries in Canada, 22,20-24.
    Eisenberg, M. B. Lowe, C. A. & Spitzer, K. L. (2004). Information
    literacy: Essentia skills for the information age. Westport, CT:
    Libraries Unlimited.
    Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia:
    Open University Press.
    Haver, P. (2001). The effect of the process of collaboration among elementary school library media specialists, teachers, and principals on student achievement in Georgia elementary schools. FL: The Florida State Univ.
    Kuhlthau, C. (1987). Information skills for an information society: A review
    of research. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information
    Resources. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED297740)
    McClure, C. R. (1994). Network literacy: A role of librarian? Information
    Technology and Libraries, 13(2), 115-125.
    Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
    Pappas, M. L.; Tepe, A. E.(2002).Pappas and Tepe`s pathways
    to knowledge model.School Library Media Activities Monthly, v19
    n3, 24-27.
    Shannon, D. (2002). Kuhlthau’s information search process. School
    Library Media Activities Monthly, 19, 2.
    Sutter, L.; Sutter, H.(1999).Finding the right path: researching your way to discovery. Professional Growth Series.Worthington, OH:Linworth Publishing.                             
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
    1009130051
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1009130051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    005101.pdf15757KbAdobe PDF2390View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback