English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92604/122928 (75%)
Visitors : 26801915      Online Users : 361
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/121401
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121401

    Title: A Comparative Study of International Branch Campuses in Malaysia, Singapore, China and South Korea: Regulation, Governance and Quality Assurance
    Authors: 侯永琪
    Hou, Angela Yung‑Chi
    Hill, Christopher;Chen, Karen Hui Jung;Tsai, Sandy
    Contributors: 教育學院
    Keywords: International branch campus;Quality assurance;Regulation;Governance
    Date: 2018-08
    Issue Date: 2018-12-17 14:51:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Malaysia, Singapore, China, and South Korea employed branch campuses as a means to develop and promote economic growth and global competitiveness. The aim of this study was to explore national policies and regulatory frameworks for international branch campuses in the four key nations identified above. The development of internal quality assurance mechanisms and external review approaches in international branch campuses were investigated, via in-depth interview and document analysis. The study presented three major findings. First, an inclusive model of internal quality has been developed in international branch campuses found in the four nations. Second, the international branch campuses’ external quality assurance approaches, in the four countries, were diverse and included exemption, reliance on home country accreditation, duplication, and international accreditation. Third, South Korea and Singapore were more closely aligned to liberal regulation with minimal quality assurance, whereas Malaysia and China were in the category of liberal regulation and restrict regulation,respectively, but with comprehensive quality assurance process.
    Relation: Asia Pacific Education Review,Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 543–555
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9550-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12564-018-9550-9
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    555.pdf904KbAdobe PDF205View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback