English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89685/119491 (75%)
Visitors : 23936137      Online Users : 148
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/15412
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/15412

    Title: 美國身心障礙教育立法與判例之分析研究
    Other Titles: The Legal Guideline of Education for Disabled Students: An Analysis of Legislation and Court Cases in America
    Authors: 秦夢群
    Keywords: 美國教育 ; 身心障礙教育 ; 特殊教育 ; 美國法院判例;Special education ; American education ; Education for disabled students
    Date: 2004-06
    Issue Date: 2008-12-17 10:18:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二次大戰前,身心障礙學生之受教權受到長期忽視。美國自1970年代,經由各種相關立法與法院之判決,確立身心障礙學生教育的政策與執行程序。然而由於財政等種種因素,學校與家長在處理身心障礙教育相關議題時有爭議,此時法院之判決即極為重要。基於此,本文首先探討美國自1970年代以來推行的身心障礙法案,次就歷年爭議之議題,分析相關法院的見解與影響。議題如何謂免費之適當教育、其他服務之範圍、身心障礙學生之停學、零拒絕政策、單方面安置之補助、回歸主流等,均對身心障礙教育之推行有顯著影響。本研究希望藉著對美國政府與法院在解決身心障礙教育各項爭議做法之探討,提供我國未來推行特殊教育之參考。 Historically, children with physical or mental disabilities were denied the right to a free and appropriate education by being excluded from schools. However, through a series of litigation and legislation, starting from the 1970s, addressed the rights of disabled children, states and local school districts have been required to provide needed educational services to children with disabilities to guarantee them the right to a proper education. Focusing the courts’ consistent interpretations of federal legislation protecting the rights of children with disabilities, this paper aims to examine the main policy changes for education provided for children with disabilities. Court cases related to comprehensive individual testing, individual education program, least restrictive environment, free appropriate education, exclusion of special education students, zero reject, and reimbursement for the costs of unilateral parental placement have been reviewed. It is found that the legal guideline emerged from the court cases mandates, with regard to disabled students, that equality of opportunity may require a different and more extensive program be offered.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究 27(2),231-254
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文
    [教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback