English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 79989/109047 (73%)
造訪人次 : 20628241      線上人數 : 410
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33397


    題名: Argument-Function Linking in Yami:An Optimality-Theoretic Account
    雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能連結:以優選理論分析
    作者: 鄧敦弘
    貢獻者: 何萬順
    Her, One-soon
    鄧敦弘
    關鍵詞: 優選理論
    雅美語
    優選詞彙映照理論
    南島語
    論旨角色與語法功能連結
    Optimailty Theory
    Yami
    OT-LMT
    Autronesian language
    Argument-function linking
    日期: 2004
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:28:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文旨在描述並嘗試以優選詞彙功能語法理論(OT-LMT)處理雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能的連結。雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能連結呈現出作格語言的特性,以致跟中文或英文有很大的差別。並且雅美語的連結又受到了焦點系統的影響,所以更加的複雜。現存的連結理論無論是以變換語法理論為基礎或以詞彙語法為基礎的,似乎都無法很直接簡潔的描述雅美語。本論文嘗試架構一個以優選理論為基礎的新連結模型,並且除了將之使用在雅美語上之外,也同時以這個新的模型來處理中文和英文中的連結。由於優選理論具有彈性的特性,這三種語言不同的連結模式,都可以被包含在這個新的模型當中。
    This thesis studies the problem of argument-function linking in Yami and makes the fundamental claim that linking in Yami shows an ergative pattern, quite different from that in accusative languages, such as Mandarin and English. The linking phenomenon in Yami is complicated by its special voice system. Existing linking theories do not account for Yami straightforwardly. In trying to find a framework that can handle the Yami data, we find the flexibility of Optimality Theory a promising solution. The first part of this thesis is a description of the argument-function linking pattern in Yami and the proper place of the voice system is also discussed. And then we review several grammatical theories on linking. Both transformation-based theories and lexicalist theories are examined. We will demonstrate how these theories fail to account for linking in Yami in a straightforward manner. Thus we provide an optimality-theoretic account based on the lexical mapping theory of Lexical-Functional Grammar. This newly developed framework is applied not only to the Yami data but also to the relevant Mandarin and English data. It is claimed that this framework can accommodate all three different languages.
    參考文獻: Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choices in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 673-711.
    Bittner, Maria and Ken Hale. 1996. The structure determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry. 27.1:1-68.
    Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70.72-131.
    Bresnan, Joan. 2000. Optimal syntax. Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax and acquisition, ed by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 334-385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Bresnan, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Deep unaccusativity in LFG. Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective, ed by K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell and E. M. Bikandi, 45-57. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications/Stanford Linguistics Association.
    Bresnan, Joan and J. M. Kanerva. 1989. Loctive inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20.1-50.
    Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Butt, Miriam, Mary Dalrymple, and Anette Frank. 1997. An architecture for linking theory in LFG. The Proceedings of the LFG '97 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King. University of California, San Diego.
    Carnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Chang, Yung-li. 1997. Voice, case and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Tsing-Hua University.
    Chang, Clair Hsun-huei. 2000. Yami reference grammar. Taipei: Yuen Liu.
    Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Passive and voice. Passive and voice, ed by Masayoshi Shibatani, 9-23. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co.
    Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.547-619.
    Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    Gault, JoAnn. 1997. Thoughts concerning ergativity, subject and focus in Sama Bangingi’. Selected papers from the 8ICAL. 393-422.
    Gilbert, Dicky and Helen de Hoop. 1998. Conflicting constraints: An introduction to Optimaility Theory. Lingua 104.1-12.
    Guilfoyle E, H. Huang, and L.Travis. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11.45-84.
    Her, One-soon. 2003. Chinese inversion constructions with a simplified LMT. Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of chinese, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph, No. 19, ed by A.Botomo and K. Luke.
    Her, One-soon. 2005. Optimality-theoretic lexical mapping theory: A case study of locative inversion. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, Vol 2.1
    Ho, Arlene Yue-ling. 1990. Yami Structure: A Descriptive Study of the Yami Language. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
    Holmer, Arthur. 2001. The ergativity parameter. Lund unversity linguistic department working papers 48.101-13.
    Hopper, P. and Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56.2.
    Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Toward a Universal Definition of “Subject”. Subject and topic, ed by Charles N. Li. London: Academic Press.
    Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistics Inquiry 8.63-99.
    Kroeger, Paul R. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    Legendre, Geraldine, William Raymond, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. An optimality-theoretic typology of case and grammatical voice systems. Proceedings of BLS 19, 464-478.
    Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1997. A syntactic typology of Formosan Languages – Case markers on nouns and pronouns. Typological studies of languages in China. Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, No. 4, 443-477. Academia Sinica.
    Liao, Hsiu-chuan. (2004). Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i.
    Lødrup, Helge. 1999. Linking and optimaility in the Norwegian presentational focus construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.205-30.
    Maclachlan, Anna. 2002. Optimailty and three western Austronesian case systems. Language universals and variation, ed by Mengistu Amberber and Peter Collins, 155-84.
    Manning, Christopher. 1995. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Paper presented in LSA 95.
    Marantz, A. P. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Morimoto, Yukiko. 1999. An optimality account of argument reversal. The Proceedings of the LFG '99 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy King. University of Manchester, UK, July 19-21.
    Paul, Ileana M. 2000. Malagasy clause structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University. .
    Phillips, Collin. 1995. Ergative subjects. Grammatical relations: theoretical approaches to empirical questions, ed by Clifford S. Burgess, Katarzyna Dziwirek and Donna Gerdts. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
    Prince, Alan and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. RuCCS Technical Report #2. Piscateway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
    Rau Der-Hwa V. and Ma-nyu Tung. to appear. Tao dictionary: reference grammar, texts, and dictionary. Language and Linguistics Monograph. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    Reid, Lawrence A. and Hsiu-chuan Liao. 2004. A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Special Issue of Language and Linguistics 5 (2):433–490
    Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic or none of the above. Subject and topic, ed by C. Li, 491-518. New York: Academic Press.
    Schachter, Paul and Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
    Sells, Peter. 1998. The function of voice markers in the Philippine Languages. Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, ed by Steven Lapointe et al., 111-137. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    Sells, Peter. ed. 2001. Formal and empirical issues in optimality-theoretic Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    Shibatani, Masayahi. 1988. Voice in Philippine languages. Passive and Voice, ed by Masyahi Shibatani, 85-142.
    Starosta, Stanley. 2002. Austronesian “focus” as derivation: evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2.427-79.
    Tung, Ma-nyu and Der-Hwa V. Rau. 2000. Yami Texts. Taipei: Crane.
    Wechsler, Stephen and I Wayan Arka. 1998. Syntatic ergativity in Balinese: An argument structure based theory. Natural language and linguistic theory 16. 387-441
    Yami New Testament. 1994. Taipei: The Bible society in the R.O.C.
    Wang, Shan-shan. (2004). An ergative view of Thao syntax. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    91555011
    93
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550111
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55011101.pdf43KbAdobe PDF1601檢視/開啟
    55011102.pdf79KbAdobe PDF1840檢視/開啟
    55011103.pdf13KbAdobe PDF1399檢視/開啟
    55011104.pdf60KbAdobe PDF1464檢視/開啟
    55011105.pdf27KbAdobe PDF2020檢視/開啟
    55011106.pdf66KbAdobe PDF1692檢視/開啟
    55011107.pdf120KbAdobe PDF1819檢視/開啟
    55011108.pdf134KbAdobe PDF1514檢視/開啟
    55011109.pdf28KbAdobe PDF20502檢視/開啟
    55011110.pdf19KbAdobe PDF1781檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋