Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Argument-Function Linking in Yami:An Optimality-Theoretic Account|
|Issue Date: ||2009-09-17 16:28:35 (UTC+8)|
This thesis studies the problem of argument-function linking in Yami and makes the fundamental claim that linking in Yami shows an ergative pattern, quite different from that in accusative languages, such as Mandarin and English. The linking phenomenon in Yami is complicated by its special voice system. Existing linking theories do not account for Yami straightforwardly. In trying to find a framework that can handle the Yami data, we find the flexibility of Optimality Theory a promising solution. The first part of this thesis is a description of the argument-function linking pattern in Yami and the proper place of the voice system is also discussed. And then we review several grammatical theories on linking. Both transformation-based theories and lexicalist theories are examined. We will demonstrate how these theories fail to account for linking in Yami in a straightforward manner. Thus we provide an optimality-theoretic account based on the lexical mapping theory of Lexical-Functional Grammar. This newly developed framework is applied not only to the Yami data but also to the relevant Mandarin and English data. It is claimed that this framework can accommodate all three different languages.
|Reference: ||Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choices in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 673-711.|
Bittner, Maria and Ken Hale. 1996. The structure determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry. 27.1:1-68.
Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70.72-131.
Bresnan, Joan. 2000. Optimal syntax. Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax and acquisition, ed by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 334-385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Bresnan, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Deep unaccusativity in LFG. Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective, ed by K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell and E. M. Bikandi, 45-57. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications/Stanford Linguistics Association.
Bresnan, Joan and J. M. Kanerva. 1989. Loctive inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20.1-50.
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Butt, Miriam, Mary Dalrymple, and Anette Frank. 1997. An architecture for linking theory in LFG. The Proceedings of the LFG '97 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King. University of California, San Diego.
Carnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Chang, Yung-li. 1997. Voice, case and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Tsing-Hua University.
Chang, Clair Hsun-huei. 2000. Yami reference grammar. Taipei: Yuen Liu.
Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Passive and voice. Passive and voice, ed by Masayoshi Shibatani, 9-23. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.547-619.
Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Gault, JoAnn. 1997. Thoughts concerning ergativity, subject and focus in Sama Bangingi’. Selected papers from the 8ICAL. 393-422.
Gilbert, Dicky and Helen de Hoop. 1998. Conflicting constraints: An introduction to Optimaility Theory. Lingua 104.1-12.
Guilfoyle E, H. Huang, and L.Travis. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11.45-84.
Her, One-soon. 2003. Chinese inversion constructions with a simplified LMT. Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of chinese, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph, No. 19, ed by A.Botomo and K. Luke.
Her, One-soon. 2005. Optimality-theoretic lexical mapping theory: A case study of locative inversion. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, Vol 2.1
Ho, Arlene Yue-ling. 1990. Yami Structure: A Descriptive Study of the Yami Language. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Holmer, Arthur. 2001. The ergativity parameter. Lund unversity linguistic department working papers 48.101-13.
Hopper, P. and Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56.2.
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Toward a Universal Definition of “Subject”. Subject and topic, ed by Charles N. Li. London: Academic Press.
Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistics Inquiry 8.63-99.
Kroeger, Paul R. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Legendre, Geraldine, William Raymond, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. An optimality-theoretic typology of case and grammatical voice systems. Proceedings of BLS 19, 464-478.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1997. A syntactic typology of Formosan Languages – Case markers on nouns and pronouns. Typological studies of languages in China. Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, No. 4, 443-477. Academia Sinica.
Liao, Hsiu-chuan. (2004). Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i.
Lødrup, Helge. 1999. Linking and optimaility in the Norwegian presentational focus construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.205-30.
Maclachlan, Anna. 2002. Optimailty and three western Austronesian case systems. Language universals and variation, ed by Mengistu Amberber and Peter Collins, 155-84.
Manning, Christopher. 1995. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Paper presented in LSA 95.
Marantz, A. P. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Morimoto, Yukiko. 1999. An optimality account of argument reversal. The Proceedings of the LFG '99 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy King. University of Manchester, UK, July 19-21.
Paul, Ileana M. 2000. Malagasy clause structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University. .
Phillips, Collin. 1995. Ergative subjects. Grammatical relations: theoretical approaches to empirical questions, ed by Clifford S. Burgess, Katarzyna Dziwirek and Donna Gerdts. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Prince, Alan and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. RuCCS Technical Report #2. Piscateway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
Rau Der-Hwa V. and Ma-nyu Tung. to appear. Tao dictionary: reference grammar, texts, and dictionary. Language and Linguistics Monograph. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Reid, Lawrence A. and Hsiu-chuan Liao. 2004. A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Special Issue of Language and Linguistics 5 (2):433–490
Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic or none of the above. Subject and topic, ed by C. Li, 491-518. New York: Academic Press.
Schachter, Paul and Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Sells, Peter. 1998. The function of voice markers in the Philippine Languages. Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, ed by Steven Lapointe et al., 111-137. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Sells, Peter. ed. 2001. Formal and empirical issues in optimality-theoretic Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Shibatani, Masayahi. 1988. Voice in Philippine languages. Passive and Voice, ed by Masyahi Shibatani, 85-142.
Starosta, Stanley. 2002. Austronesian “focus” as derivation: evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2.427-79.
Tung, Ma-nyu and Der-Hwa V. Rau. 2000. Yami Texts. Taipei: Crane.
Wechsler, Stephen and I Wayan Arka. 1998. Syntatic ergativity in Balinese: An argument structure based theory. Natural language and linguistic theory 16. 387-441
Yami New Testament. 1994. Taipei: The Bible society in the R.O.C.
Wang, Shan-shan. (2004). An ergative view of Thao syntax. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i.
|Source URI: ||http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550111|
|Data Type: ||thesis|
|Appears in Collections:||[語言學研究所] 學位論文|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.