政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35030
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 110052/141001 (78%)
造访人次 : 46384545      在线人数 : 1327
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/35030


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35030


    题名: 累積滿意度邊際微調模型之研究—消費者失驗之觀點
    A Study on Cumulative Satisfaction-Based Transaction-Specific Satisfaction Marginally Adjusting Model: Consumers` Disconfirmation Perspective
    作者: 魏聖忠
    Wei, Sheng-Chung
    贡献者: 樓永堅
    Lou, Yung-Chien
    魏聖忠
    Wei, Sheng-Chung
    关键词: 品質失驗
    滿意度失驗
    個別交易滿意度
    累積滿意度
    邊際微調模型
    忠誠門檻模型
    Quality Disconfirmation
    Satisfaction Disconfirmation
    Transaction-Specific Satisfaction
    Cumulative Satisfaction
    Marginally Adjusting Model
    Royal Threshod Model
    日期: 2004
    上传时间: 2009-09-18 13:36:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究提出一個四階段的消費者重購承諾心理評價程序模式,認為消費者將依據知覺品質和期望品質的比較形成品質失驗,然後藉由內在的價值函數將品質失驗轉換成為同樣是失驗觀點的個別交易滿意度(滿意度失驗)。在形成個別交易滿意度之後,消費者將依循累積滿意度基礎的個別交易滿意度邊際微調模型來形成當期的累積滿意度,並且依據當期的累積滿意度和當期的忠誠門檻值比較的結果,進而產生品牌忠誠或品牌轉換的行為意圖。
    整體而言,失驗觀點的個別交易滿意度(滿意度失驗)和品質失驗之間的關係大致服膺期望理論價值函數的特性。此外,本研究提出的累積滿意度基礎的個別交易滿意度邊際微調模型也獲得支持,並進一步確定累積滿意度的調整過程主要是採行性線的調整模式。最後,本研究提出的累積滿意度忠誠門檻模型亦獲得實證證據的充分支持。因此,一旦當期的累積滿意度決定之後,消費者將以他心目中對競爭品牌的累積滿意度做為比較的基礎、當作忠誠門檻值,進行焦點品牌累積滿意度和競爭品牌累積滿意度的比較,並且依據比較的結果形成品牌忠誠或品牌轉換的行為意圖。
    This study proposes a four-stage model about the process of consumers’ repurchase commitment. The model postulates that consumers would result in quality disconfirmation based on the result of comparison between perceived quality and expected quality, then transform it through intrinsic value function into transaction-specific satisfaction which is defined as satisfaction disconfirmation. Once transaction-specific satisfaction is formed, consumers would result in current cumulative satisfaction according to cumulative satisfaction-based transaction-specific satisfaction marginally adjusting model that depicts current cumulative satisfaction as a function of previous cumulative satisfaction and current transaction-specific satisfaction. And finally, according to loyal threshold model of cumulative satisfaction, intention to repurchase or switch buying would be formed based on the relative magnitude between cumulative satisfaction and loyal threshold which is defined as cumulative satisfaction towards a main competing brand.
    Overall speaking, the relation function between quality disconfirmation and transaction-specific satisfaction exhibits most traits of value function depicted in the prospect theory. Furthermore, the cumulative satisfaction-based transaction-specific satisfaction marginally adjusting model proposed by this study was supported by experimental data, and the result shows that the adjusting process of cumulative satisfaction complies mainly with linear adjusting model. And finally, the loyal threshold model of cumulative satisfaction was fully supported by experimental data, and the result implies that consumers would take the cumulative satisfaction towards a main competing brand as the comparing basis, i.e., loyal threshold, and then compare cumulative satisfaction towards a focal brand with this comparing basis to decide whether to repurchase the products of the focal brand or instead switching to buy the goods of the competing brand.
    參考文獻: 1. 魏聖忠,民國91年10月,「當代行銷觀念新思維:市場導向理論的回顧與評價」,管理評論,第二十一卷,第四期,頁129-153。
    2. Anderson, Eugene W. and Claes Fornell (1994), “A Customer Satisfaction Prospectus,” in Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Richard L. Oliver and Roland T. Rust, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 241-268.
    3. Anderson, Eugene W. and Claes Fornell (2000), “Foundations of the American Customer Satisfaction Index,” Total Quality Management, 11 (7), 869-882.
    4. Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, and Donald R. Lehmann (1994), “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (July), 53-66.
    5. Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, and Roland T. Rust (1997), “Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services,” Marketing Science, 16 (2), 129-45.
    6. Anderson, Eugene W. and Mary W. Sullivan (1993), “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms,” Marketing Science, 12 (2), 125-43.
    7. Andreassen, Tor Wallin (2001), “From Disgust to Delight: Do Customer Hold a Grudge?” Journal of Service Research, 4 (1), 39-49.
    8. Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
    9. Bearden, William D. and Jesse E. Teel (1983), “Selected Determinants of Customer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (February), 21-28.
    10. Bentham, Jeremy (1789), An Introduction to the Principles and Morals of Legislation. London: T. Payne.
    11. Bitner, Mary Jo and Amy R. Hubbert (1994), “Encounter Satisfaction versus Overall Satisfaction versus Quality,” in Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Richard L. Oliver and Roland T. Rust, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 72-94.
    12. Bitner, Mary Jo (1995), “Building Service Relationships: It’s All About Promises,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 246-251.
    13. Bolton, Ruth N. (1998), “A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer’s Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction,” Marketing Science, 17 (1), 45-65.
    14. Bolton, Ruth N. and James H. Drew (1991), “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (January), 1-9.
    15. Boulding, William, Ajay Kalra, Richard Staelin, and Valarie A. Zeithaml (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (February), 7-27.
    16. Brady, Michael K. and J. Joseph Cronin, Jr. (2001), “Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (July), 34-49.
    17. Calder, Bobby J., Lynn W. Phillips, and Alice M. Tybout (1981), “Designing Research for Application,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (September), 197-207.
    18. Cardozo, Richard N. (1965), “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August), 244-249.
    19. Carlzon, J. (1987), Moments of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
    20. Chiou, Jyh-Shen, Cornelia Droge, and Sangphet Hanvanich (2002), “Does Customer Knowledge Affect How Loyalty Is Formed?” Journal of Service Resaerch, 5 (2), 113-124.
    21. Chiou, Jyh-Shen, Chia-Hung Hsieh, and Ching-Hsien Yang (2004), “The Effect of Franchisors’ Communication, Service Assistance, and Competitive Advantage on Franchisees’ Intentions to Remain in the Franchise System,” Journal of Small Business Management, 42 (1), 19-36.
    22. Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr., and Carol Surprenant (1982), “An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Resaerch, 19 (November), 491-504.
    23. Cohen, Jacob and Patricia Cohen (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrece Erlbaum Associates.
    24. Cronin, Jr., J. Joseph, Michael K. Brady, and G. Tomas M. Hult (2000), “Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Customer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments,” Journal of Retailing, 76 (2), 193-218.
    25. Cronin, J. Joseph, Jr., and Steven A. Taylor (1992), “Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (July), 55-68.
    26. Danaher, Peter J. and Jan Mattsson (1994), “Cumulative Encounter Satisfaction in the Hotel Conference Process,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5 (4), 69-80.
    27. Davidson, Russell and James G. MacKinnon (1981), “Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses,” Econometrica, 49 (May), 781-793.
    28. Day, George S. (1969), “A Two-Dimensional Concept of Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Advertising Research, 9, 29-35.
    29. Dick, Alan S. and Kunal Basu (1994), "Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (2), 99-113.
    30. Einhorn, Hillel J. and Robin M. Hogarth (1981), “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice,” Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88.
    31. Fornell, Claes (1992), “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (January), 6-21.
    32. Fornell, Claes, Michael D. Johnson, Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, and Barbara Everitt Bryant (1996), “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (October), 7-18.
    33. Garbarino, Ellen and Mark S. Johnson (1999), “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 70-87.
    34. Gilboa, Itzhak and David Schmeidler (1997), “Cumulative Utility Consumer Theory,” International Economic Review, 38 (4), 737-761.
    35. Gilly, Mary C. (1987), “Postcomplaint Processes: From Organizational Responses to Repurchase Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 21 (Winter), 293-313.
    36. Gronholdt, Lars, Anne Martensen, and Kai Kristensen (2000), “The Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Cross-Industry Differences,” Total Quality Management, 11 (4/5&6), 509-514.
    37. Gronroos, Christian (1982), Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector. Helsingfors: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
    38. Gronroos, Christian (1984), “A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications,” European Journal of Marketing, 18 (4), 36-44.
    39. Guolla, Michael (1999), “Assessing the Teaching Quality to Student Satisfaction Relationship: Applied Customer Satisfaction Research in the Classroom,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (3), 87-97.
    40. Hallowell, Roger (1996), “The Relationships of Customer Satisfaction, Customer Loyalty, and Profitability: An Empirical Study,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7 (4), 27-42.
    41. Halstead, Diane (1999), “The Use of Comparison Standards in Customer Satisfaction Research and Management: A Review and Proposed Typology,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (3), 13-26.
    42. Helson, Harry (1964), Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
    43. Hirschman, Albert O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty—Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    44. Hunt, Keith H. (1977), “CS/D—Overview and Future Research Directions,” in Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, H. Keith Hunt, ed. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 455-488.
    45. Johnson, Michael D., Eugene W. Anderson, and Claes Fornell (1995), “Rational and Adaptive Performance Expectations in a Customer Satisfaction Framework,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (March), 695-707.
    46. Johnson, Michael D. and Claes Fornell (1991), “A Framework for Comparing Customer Satisfaction Across Individual and Product Categories,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 267-86.
    47. Jones, Michael A. and Jaebeom Suh (2000), “Transaction-Specific Satisfaction and Overall Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Services Marketing, 14 (2), 147-159.
    48. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (March), 263-91.
    49. Kasper, Hans (1988), “On Problem Perception, Dissatisfaction and Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 387-397.
    50. Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), 1-18.
    51. LaBarbera, Priscilla A. and David Mazursky (1983), “A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (November), 393-404.
    52. LaTour, Stephen A. and Nancy C. Peat (1979), “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, William L. Wilkie, ed. Miami, MI: Association for Consumer research, 431-437.
    53. Miller, John A. (1977), “Studying Satisfaction, Modifying Models, Eliciting Expectations, Posing Problems, and Making Meaningful Measurements,” in Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, H. Keith Hunt, ed. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA, 72-91.
    54. Mittal, Vikas and Wagner A. Kamakura (2001), ”Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Consumer Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (February), 131-42.
    55. Mittal, Vikas, Pankaj Kumar, and Michael Tsiros (1999), “Attribute-Level Performance, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions over Time: A Consumption-System Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 88-101.
    56. Mittal, Vikas, William T. Ross, Jr., and Patrick M. Baldasare (1998), “The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 33-47.
    57. Monroe, Kent B. (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.
    58. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater (1990), "The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability," Journal of Marketing, 54 (October), 20-35.
    59. Newman, Joseph W. and Richard A. Werbel (1973), “Multivariate Analysis of Brand Loyalty for Major Household Appliances,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (November), 404-409.
    60. Oliva, Terence A., Richard L. Oliver, and Ian C. MacMillan (1992), “A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (July), 83-95.
    61. Oliver, Richard L. (1977), “Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation on Post-Exposure Product Evaluation: An Alternative Interpretation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (April), 480-6.
    62. Oliver, Richard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (November), 460-69.
    63. Oliver, Richard L. (1981), “Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retailing Settings,” Journal of Retailing, 57 (3), 25-48.
    64. Oliver, Richard L. (1993), “Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (December), 418-430.
    65. Oliver, Richard L. (1995), “Attribute Need Fulfillment in Product Usage Satisfaction,” Psychology & Marketing, 12 (January), 1-17.
    66. Oliver, Richard L. (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    67. Oliver, Richard L. (1999), “Whence Customer Loyalty?” Journal of Marketing, 53 (Special Issue), 33-44.
    68. Oliver, Richard L. and Wayne S. DeSarbo (1988), “Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (March), 495-507.
    69. Oliver, R.L. and Linda, G. (1981), "Effect of Satisfaction and Its Antecedents on Consumer Preference and Intention", in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, Kent B. Monroe, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 88-93.
    70. Oliver, Richard L. and John E. Swan (1989), “Equity and Disconfirmation Perceptions as Influences on Merchant and Product Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (December), 372-383.
    71. Olsen, Svein Ottar (2002), “Comparative Evaluation and the Relationship Between Quality, Satisfaction, and Repurchase Loyalty,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (3), 240-249.
    72. Olsen, Line Lervik and Michael D. Johnson (2003), “Service Equity, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: From Transaction-Specific to Cumulative Evaluations,” Journal of Service Research, 5 (3), 184-195.
    73. Parasuraman, A., Leonard L. Berry, and Valarie A. Zeithaml (1991), “Understanding Customer Expectations of Service,” Sloan Management Review, 32 (Spring), 39-48.
    74. Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (Fall), 41-50.
    75. Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12-40.
    76. Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry (1994), “Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 111-24.
    77. Patterson, Paul G., Lester W. Johnson, and Richard A. Spreng (1997),” Modeling the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction for Business-to-Business Professional Services,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (1), 4-17.
    78. Peyrot, Mark and Doris Van Doren (1994), “Effect of a Class Action Suit on Consumer Repurchase Intentions,” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 28 (2), 361-379.
    79. Prakash, Ved, and John W. Lounsbury (1984), “The Role of Expectations in the Determination of Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12 (Summer), 1-17.
    80. Richins, Marsha L. (1987), “A Multivariate Analysis of Responses to Dissatisfaction,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15 (Fall), 24-31.
    81. Rust, Roland T. and Richard L. Oliver (1994), “Service Quality: Insights and Managerial Implications from the Frontier,” in Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Richard L. Oliver and Roland T. Rust, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1-19.
    82. Sirgy, M. Joseph (1984), “A Social Cognition Model of Consumer Satisfaction/ Dissatisfaction: An Experiment,” Psychology & Marketing, 1 (Summer), 27-44.
    83. Smith, Amy K. and Ruth N. Bolton (2002), “The Effect of Customers’ Emotional Responses to Service Failures on Their Recovery Effort Evaluations and Satisfaction Judgments,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (1), 5-23.
    84. Spreng, Richard A., Gilbert D. Harrell, and Robert D. Mackoy (1995), “Service Recovery: Impact on Satisfaction and Intentions,” Journal of Services Marketing, 9 (1), 15-23.
    85. Spreng, Richard A. and Richard W. Olshavsky (1993), “A Desires Congruency Model of Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (Summer), 169-77.
    86. Spreng, Richard A., Scott B. MacKenzie, and Richard W. Olshavsky (1996), “A Reexamination of the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (July), 15-32.
    87. Strandvik, Tore (1994), Tolerance Zones in Perceived Service Quality. Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland.
    88. Swan, John E. and I. Freserick Trawick (1981), “Disconfirmation of Expectations and Satisfaction with a Retail Service,” Journal of Retailing, 57 (3), 49-67.
    89. Teas, R. Kenneth (1993), “Expectations, Performance Evaluation and Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (October), 18-34.
    90. Thaler, Richard (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4 (3), 199-214.
    91. Thibaut, John W. and Harold H. Kelley (1959), The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    92. Tse, David K. and Peter C. Wilton (1988), “Models of Consumer Satisfaction Formation: An Extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (May), 204-12.
    93. Venkatraman, N. (1989), “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 423- 444.
    94. Wernerfelt, Birger (1991), “Brand Loyalty and Market Equilibrium,” Marketing Science, 10 (Summer), 229-45.
    95. Westbrook, Robert A. and Richard L. Oliver (1981), “Developing Better Measures of Consumer Satisfaction: Some Preliminary Results,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, Kent B. Monroe, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 94-99.
    96. Woodruff, Robert B., Ernest R. Cadotte, and Roger L. Jenkins (1983), “Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (August), 296-304.
    97. Woodside, Arch G., Lisa L. Frey, and Robert Timothy Daly (1989), “Linking Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 9 (December), 5-17.
    98. Yi, Youjae (1990), “A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction,” in Review of Marketing, Valarie A. Zeithaml, ed. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 68-123.
    99. Yoon, Sung-Joon and Joo-Ho Kim (2000), “An Empirical Validation of a Loyalty Model Based on Expectation Disconfirmation,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17 (2), 120-136.
    100. Zeithaml, Valarie A., Leonard L. Berry, and A. Parasuraman, (1988), “Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (April), 35-48.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    90355509
    93
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903555091
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    55509101.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2755检视/开启
    55509102.pdf123KbAdobe PDF21045检视/开启
    55509103.pdf65KbAdobe PDF2871检视/开启
    55509104.pdf79KbAdobe PDF2823检视/开启
    55509105.pdf140KbAdobe PDF21489检视/开启
    55509106.pdf266KbAdobe PDF24166检视/开启
    55509107.pdf309KbAdobe PDF21013检视/开启
    55509108.pdf196KbAdobe PDF21825检视/开启
    55509109.pdf218KbAdobe PDF2856检视/开启
    55509110.pdf94KbAdobe PDF21029检视/开启
    55509111.pdf343KbAdobe PDF2812检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈