政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54220
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 110180/141115 (78%)
造访人次 : 46578836      在线人数 : 976
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54220


    题名: 知識建構導向電腦支援合作學習環境之學習歷程評估研究
    A study on assessing the learning processes of knowledge construction-oriented computer-supported collaborative learning environment
    作者: 楊森吉
    Yang, Sen Chi
    贡献者: 陳志銘
    Chen, Chih Ming
    楊森吉
    Yang, Sen Chi
    关键词: 知識建構
    問題解決
    序列分析
    電腦支援合作學習
    knowledge construction
    problem solving
    sequential analysis
    computer-supported collaborative learning
    日期: 2011
    上传时间: 2012-10-30 10:18:13 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探究學習者在wiki共筆、數位閱讀標註及知識論壇三種不同知識建構導向之電腦支援合作學習環境下，其合作知識建構與問題討論歷程差異，再則這三種不同學習環境是否營造不同知識建構氛圍，以及對支援知識建構是否有所欠缺。最後，針對研究結果提出有效知識建構教學的實施策略與建議。
    本研究採實驗研究法，以某國立大學數位碩士在職專班19名研究生為研究對象，分別依序體驗包括wiki共筆、合作式數位閱讀標註及知識論壇三種各具特色的知識建構導向合作學習環境，進行知識建構討論與分享，藉由搜集觀察上述三種學習環境之知識建構歷程討論及成果記錄，進行知識建構及問題解決討論概念編碼後，進行序列分析，依此觀察學員們知識建構演進之歷程，並評估問題討論的互動程度，最後輔以半結構式訪談，與序列分析結果進行交互驗證。
    結果發現學員在wiki共筆、合作式數位閱讀標註及知識論壇三種知識建構環境上，共同合作建構產出的知識建構成果均呈現一定品質水準，確實有助於輔助學生之共同知識建構成長。此外，三種電腦支援合作知識建構學習環境中，知識論壇在適當教學設計與學習策略實施下，較能發揮知識建構水準；知識論壇相當適合於問題解決討論；三種知識建構導向之電腦支援合作學習環境，對於完整支援知識建構仍有不足需要強化之處，特別是為促使學員更深入討論，以達更深層的知識建構，需要更好的教學設計與學習策略。
    最後本研究根據研究結果，歸納出幾點建議，作為教師在進行合作知識建構教學時，選擇電腦支援合作學習環境之參考，並對未來研究方向提出建議。
    The major purpose of the present study was investigate the learners would have the differences of the progress of knowledge construction and problem discussion, which were under the three different guided knowledge construction in the computer-supported collaborative learning environments, the three learning environments including wiki, knowledge-based annotation learning system, and Knowledge Forum. A secondary purpose of this study was to examine if these three different learning environments would build the variety atmospheres of knowledge construction, and then the deficiency in the computer-supported collaborative learning. Finally, the conclusion drawn above should be proposed the efficient policy and suggestion in relation to the effective teaching of knowledge construction.
    The method to carry out this study was using an experimental research. The participant in this research were 19 postgraduate students enrolled in executive master of digital systems in one national university. In this experiment, all participants experienced the three different guided knowledge construction in the computer-supported collaborative learning environments in order, each differs from one another, including, wiki, knowledge-based annotation learning system, and Knowledge Forum. Furthermore, all subjects focused on the discussion and shared the progress of the knowledge construction and the results of the accomplishment by searching and observing the above three varied environments. The data of knowledge construction and problem solving were to conceptual encoded and processed the sequential analysis in order to observe the evolution of the progress of knowledge construction of all subjects, and to estimate the level of interaction of problem discussion. Lastly, we used the auxiliary semi-constructed interview and the result of sequential analysis to work with the cross-validation.
    The findings suggest that the participants produced the conclusions with coordinated knowledge construction which appeared in a certain quality, and this result indeed helped learners to grow-up in the coordinated knowledge construction. Additionally, Knowledge Forum firstly developed well standard under the congruent design and tactic of teaching in these three computer-supported collaborative learning environments. And then Knowledge Forum would be even more proper to discuss the problem solving. However, there is an insufficient part which needs to be strength of the three guided computer-supported collaborative learning environments for the complete computer-supported learning environments, most particularly, to be able to stimulate the subjects would go deep into the discussion in order to achieve the more depth of the knowledge construction, at the same time require the preferable instructional design and learning strategy.
    On the basis of the findings we sum up the few suggestions: As teacher, this study would be a reference to choose computer-supported collaborative learning environment when teach the coordinated knowledge construction, and then to address the suggestion in relation to the future research.
    參考文獻: Argyle, M. (1974). The scientific study of social behaviour. Westport: Greenwood.
    Arko, R. A., Ginger, K. M., Kastens, K. A., & Weatherley, J. (2006). Using annotations to add value to a digital library for education.D-Lib Magazine,12(5), 1082-9873.
    Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: asocial cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., Cunningham, D. J., & Team, I. L. F. D. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96.
    Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 623-643.
    Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
    Boulos, M. N., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6(1), 1-8.
    Chao, P. Y., Chen, G. D., & Chang, C. W. (2010). Developing a cross-media system to facilitate question-driven digital annotations on paper textbooks. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 38-49.
    Chu, S. K. W. (2008). TWiki for knowledge building and management. Online Information Review, 32(6), 745-758.
    Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105-122.
    Cunningham, W. & Taylor, P. (2003). Correspondence on the Etymology of Wiki. Retrieved, February 10, 2011 from http://c2.com/doc/etymology.html.

    Cunningham, W. (2007). Wiki Wiki Web. Retrieved, February 10, 2011 from http://c2.com/cgi/Wiki
    Dalziel, J. R. (2003). Implementing learning design: the learning activity management system (LAMS). In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, & J. Baron (Eds.), Interact, integrate, impact: proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in Tertiary education. Adelaide, 7-10 December 2003. Wollongong, N. S. W. : Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved, February 22, 2011 from http://www.melcoe.mq.edu.au/documents/ASCILITE2003%20Dalziel%20Final.pdf
    Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N. J. (2007). Students` experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496-514.
    Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed) Collaborative-learning: cognitive and computational approaches. (pp.1-19). Oxford: Elsevier
    Donne, T. (1624). Devotions upon emergent occasions, XVII, p69, Available from http://www.munseys.com/diskfive/devem.pdf
    Emfinger, K. (2009). Numerical conceptions reflected during multiagechild-initiated pretend play. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(4), 326-334.
    Feltz, D. & Lirgg, C. (2001). Self-efficacy Beliefs of Athletes, Teams, and Coaches. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 340-361). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2007). Constructing text: Wiki as a toolkit for (collaborative?) learning. Paper presented at the WikiSym `07: Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis.
    Gan, Y. C., & Zhu, Z. T. (2007). A learning framework for knowledge building and collective wisdom advancement in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 206-226.
    Garrison, D. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C. & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
    Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16.
     
    Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2008). Analysis of problem-solving-based online asynchronous discussion pattern. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 17-28.
    Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459-1468.
    Jeong, H., & Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Does collaborative learning lead to the construction of common knowledge? In L. R. Gleitman, & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conferenceof the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 699-704). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Creative and critical thinking through academic controversy. The American Behavioral Scientist, 37(1), 40.
    Johnson, P. J., Goldsmith, T. E., & Teague, K. W. (1994). Locus of the predictive advantage in pathfinder-based representations of classroom knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 617-626.
    Kawase, R., Herder, E., Papadakis, G., & Nejdl, W. (2011). In-Context Annotations for Refinding and Sharing. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 75(2), 85-100.
    Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning.Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 1–10.
    Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353.
    Law, N. (2005). Assessing learning outcomes in CSCL settings.Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, Taipei, Taiwan, 373 – 377.
    Lee, Y. W., Chen, F. C., & Jiang, H. M. (2006). Lurking as participation: a community perspective on lurkers` identity and negotiability. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences.
    Lewis, R. (1995). Editorial: professional learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 11 (4), 193-195.
    Lloyd, M. M., & Duncan-Howell, J. A. (2008). Discussing, sharing and collaborating: Distributed constructionism goes online. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) 2008. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/15349/
    Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 387-412.
    Marshall, C. (1997). Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. Paper presented at the DL `97: Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries.
    Merges, K. R., Powell, A. B., Lai, F. F., & O`Hara, K. (2009). Integration of knowledge through Wiki use in an online, synchronous environment. Paper presented at the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North American Chapter.
    Merges, K. R. (2011). Tracing knowledge transfer through a wiki in an online, synchronous environment. Unpublished Ed. D., Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.
    Mylläri, J., Ählberg, M., & Dillon, P. (2010). The dynamics of an online knowledge building community: A 5-year longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 365-387.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company : how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
    Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000). Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proceedings of CHI 2000. The Hague: ACM.
    Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget, development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Education, 3, 176-186.
    Pifarre, M., & Staarman, J. K. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187-205.
    Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2006). Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities.Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 18, 329-354.
    Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Volume 2: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University. Available from http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/Distrib-Construc/Distrib-Construc.html
    Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37.
    Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of education, second edition. (pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
    Sing, C. C. & Khine, M. S. (2006). An Analysis of Interaction and Participation Patterns in Online Community. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 250-261.
    Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer.
    Steimle, J., Brdiczka, O., & Muhlhauser, M. (2009). Collaborative paper-based annotation of lecture slides. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 125-137.
    Su, F., & Beaumont, C. (2010). Evaluating the use of a wiki for collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(4), 417-431.
    Sun, Y. Q., Zhang, J. W., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 147-171.
    Suthers, D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5-42.
    Takeuchi, H. (2006). The new dynamism of the knowledge-creating company. In T. Shibata, & H. Takeuchi (Eds.), Advanced knowledge-creating companies (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Traphagan, T. W., Chiang, Y. H. V., Chang, H. M., Wattanawaha, B., Lee, H., Mayrath, M. C., et al. (2010). Cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual world and a text chat. Computers & Education, 55(3), 923-936.
    Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 43-55.
    van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259-287.
    von Glasersfeld, E., & Massachusetts Univ, A. S. R. R. I. (1989). An Exposition of Constructivism: Why Some Like It Radical.
    von Glasersfeld, E. (2003). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London : Taylor & Francis e-Library.
    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    White, B. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1-100.
    White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making scienceaccessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-117.
     
    White, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151-182.
    Williams, M., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Collaborating WISE scientists. Science & Children, 41(1), 31-35.
    Yang, S. J. H., Chen, I. Y. L., & Shao, N. W. Y. (2004). Ontology enabled annotation and knowledge management for collaborative learning in virtual learning community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 70-81.
    Yang, S. J. H., Zhang, J., Su, A. Y. S., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(1), 45-62.
    Zhang, J. W., Scardarnalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117-145.
    Zhang, J. W., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary School. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307.

    中文文獻
    王博賢（2010）。知識翻新教學對小學生科學探究活動與科學合作概念之影響。未出版碩士，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
    江淑卿（1997）。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究。未出版博士，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，台北市。
    朱家雄（2009）。建構主義理論在學前教育運用中的是非功過。幼兒教育，7，7-9。
    李郁文（2008）。團體動力學：群體動力的理論、實務與研究。台北市：桂冠。
    李致中（2009）。使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動。未出版碩士，國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所，桃園縣。
    吳聲毅（2008）。數位學習觀念與實作。臺北市：學貫。
    吳佳蓉（2010）。學習社群在電腦支援合作學習環境中的知識共構--以自然科學史為例。未出版碩士，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
    吳挺鋒（2010）。中學生科學興趣大調查，臺灣孩子不想當科學家。天下雜誌，462，46-48。
    林憶珊（2010）。具知識建構工具支援之數位圖書館在網路學習社群經營之研究，未出版碩士，國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所碩士，台北市。
    林書平（2010）。以想法為中心的教學設計對大學生在知識建構與知識信念上之影響。未出版碩士，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
    洪碧霞等人（2010）。PISA 2009精簡報告。台灣PISA 國家研究中心網站。檢自：http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/qa_tw.htm
    洪蘭（2010）。摘去標準答案的緊箍咒。天下雜誌，460，30-32。
    侯惠澤（2008）。線上合作解題討論教學之知識建構行為模式探究。2008電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會(CNTE 2008)。新竹：新竹教育大學資訊科技研究所。
    柯華葳（2009）。閱讀的關鍵，在思考。親子天下特刊，1。檢自：http://parenting.cw.com.tw/web/docDetail.do?docId=2892&p=2&fp=1
    高申春（2001）。人性輝煌之路－班杜拉的社會學習理論。台北市：貓頭鷹。
    高碧玉（2005）。網路學習社群互動策略之實證研究。未出版碩士，國立中山大學傳播管理研究所，高雄市。
    高瑜璟（2006）。數位學習－學習的新趨勢。網路社會學通訊期刊，57。上網日期：99年11月20日，檢自：http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/57/57-22.htm
    蔡崇元（2001）。網路教學者教學互動策略之研究─以大學推廣教育教師為例。未出版碩士，國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所，台北市。
    常唯（2008）。论网络环境下用户标注的价值与应用。图书情报工作，52(1)，9-12。
    孫春在、林珊如（2007）。網路合作學習：數位時代的互動學習環境、教學與評量。台北：心理。
    郭重吉（2002）。建構論：科學哲學的省思。載於詹志禹(主編)，建構論：理論基礎與教育應用（頁2-11）。台北縣：正中。
    郭于嫙（2010）。圖書館館員輔以知識建構工具在知識建構教學之研究，未出版碩士，國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所碩士，台北市。
    陳志銘（2009）。創新數位學習環境與教學應用。臺北市：文華。
    陳欣汝（2009）。應用Google Docs於網路合作學習之研究。未出版碩士，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班，台北縣。
    黃政傑（1996）。創思與合作的教學法。臺北市：師大書苑。
    辜樹仁（2010）。臺灣閱讀力墊底，怎麼辦？。天下雜誌，462，46-48。
    張春興（1994）。教育心理學。台北市：東華。
    張喻涵（2010）。電腦支援合作學習與知識翻新對師培生數學信念與數學教學實踐之影響。未出版碩士，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
    詹雯靜（2009）。不同電腦支援合作學習環境對師培生在教育理論、教師專業與教學實務等概念學習上之影響。未出版碩士，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
    劉怡甫（2008）。結合線上活動的學習設計─LAMS的應用(二)。輔仁大學深耕--教與學電子報，16。檢自：http://www.teachers.fju.edu.tw/epapers/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=225&limit=1&limitstart=0
    劉怡甫（2009）。LAMS的應用(三)─LAMS與其他平台的比較。輔仁大學深耕--教與學電子報，17。檢自：http://www.teachers.fju.edu.tw/epapers/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=214&Itemid=232&limit=1&limitstart=0
    賴鼎銘（2001）。圖書資訊學的內涵。載於賴鼎銘、黃慕萱、吳美美與林珊如（編著），圖書資訊學概論（頁1-37）。台北縣：空大。
    鄭晉昌（2002）。建構主義與電腦支援合作學習環境的設計與發展。載於詹志禹(主編)，建構論：理論基礎與教育應用（頁168-184）。台北縣：正中。
    謝雅慧（2007）。學習輔助者涉入網路合作學習情境中對學生學習的影響。未出版碩士，國立臺灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所，台北市。
    Berger, P. & Luckmann, T.（1991）。知識社會學-社會實體的建構。台北市：巨流。
    Mann, L. & Sabatino（1994）。認知過程的原理－補救與特殊教育上的運用（黃慧真譯）。台北市：心理。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
    98913002
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098913002
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    300201.pdf4668KbAdobe PDF2596检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈