English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46354459      Online Users : 993
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97632


    Title: 美國大學教授業績評鑑制度之研究
    Other Titles: A Study of Performance Evaluation System for the American Professors
    Authors: 趙顯圭
    Keywords: 美國 ; 大學 ; 教授 ; 業績評鑑制度
    Date: 1996-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 14:44:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究將分析美國大學的教授業績評鑑制度，希望以美國的經驗作為 他山之石，提供將來欲採行此制度之各大學作為參考。 本研究陳述分為四部分。一、簡述教授業績評鑑之概念。二、闡述美國大學教 授業績評鑑制度之內容。三、分析美國大學教授業績評鑑制度之實行現況。具 體言之，授課之評鑑、研究與著述之評鑑，以及服務活動之評鑑。四、分析教 授業績評鑑制度實行上的問題;並綜合研究結果，提出建議。 根據研究結果，本研究提出對教授業績評鑑制度在實施時，應具備的幾項先決 條件: 1.對於教授業績評鑑制度的正當性、必要性必須有共識與協議。 2.大學當局必須要有意志、使命感以及積極的後援。 3.教授業績評鑑制度的實施應採取漸進的、階段性的過程較為妥當。 4.評鑑領域，即授課、研究、服務活動的標準的決定，必須要有彈性以及規實性。 5.對於要評鑑何種業績，教授與學校當局必須有共識與協議。 6.亞洲社會是重感性的社會，在強調和諧的社會價值觀之下，教授評鑑是否會造 成競爭的風氣，進而造成教授間的衝突是必須注意的。
    As this study analyze the performance evaluation system for theAmerican professors, it would hike to provide the university, which is toadapt the system, with a useful reference. This study is stated in 4 parts; (1)Brief introduction of the concept forperformance evaluation system . (2) Description of the contents ofperformance evaluation system. (3) Execution status of the performanceevaluation system like teaching, research, publication, and serviceevaluation. (4)Problems in execution of the performance evaluation system. According to this study, if suggests a few necessary preconditions, asfollows; 1 .Need a consensus for the common recognition and necessity of the preformance evaluation system. 2. Need strong will and positive support from university authority . 3. Undergo gradual and step-by-step process in adapting of the performance evaluation system. 4. Consider flexibility and reality in setting up the criteria, such as lecture, study, and service criterion the evaluation scope. 5. Need common recognition and consensus between professors and university authority for what kind of achievements shall be evaluated. 6. Consider the probable fliction among professors caused by competitive atmosphere of performance evaluation system under the oriental society which needs harmony and homogeneity.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 19,27-42
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2232View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2318View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback