English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92604/122928 (75%)
Visitors : 26795408      Online Users : 489
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99946


    Title: 社會排斥之雙歷程因應模式:後續團體的類別相似性線索之影響 
    Other Titles: Effects of Categorical Similarity Cues on Social Exclusion
    Authors: 洪嘉欣;孫蒨如
    Keywords: 利社會行為;攻擊行為;社會排斥;團體選擇;類別相似性線索
    prosocial behavior;aggression;social exclusion;group selection;categorical similarity cue
    Date: 2015-06
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 17:13:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究提出一個社會排斥的雙歷程因應模式,強調當個體受到排斥威脅時,可能同時出現敵意及親和兩種反應,端視之後所接觸的團體其本身所提供的線索而定。若新團體與先前排斥者相似時,個體會出現較高的敵意行為;若新團體有著與其本身相似的特性時,個體則會表現出較高的親和行為。實驗一採取閾下觸發來操弄社會排斥威脅,顯示社會排斥的確會讓人加速處理那些與拒絕者與可能接受者相關之訊息。實驗二採取2(社會排斥:有、無)×5(類別相似性線索:高排斥線索vs.中排斥線索vs.高可能接受線索vs.中可能接受線索vs.中性線索)之混合設計,結果大致支持假設。
    Social exclusion may cause either aggressive behavior or a substantial increase in prosocial behavior. We propose a two-process model and suggest that categorical similarity cue of the latter encounter is the moderator of people’s reactions after social exclusion. For threaten individuals, groups resemble their rejecter would provoke a defensive attitude and hostile behaviors. These individuals would also show hospitality to those who share similar characteristics with to gain inclusion.
    Experiment one used subliminal priming to manipulate social exclusion. As predicted, compared to participants in control condition, excluded participants would process words associated with previous rejecter and words related to one’s own characteristics significantly faster than neutral words in lexical decision task.
    The second experiment were a 2 (social exclusion: exclusion vs. control condition) x 5 (categorical similarity cues: high rejective cue vs. median rejective cue, high perspective cue vs. median perspective cue vs. irrelevant cue) mixed-design. Results gave support to the model.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 38(2),59-85
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102498852015063802003
    DOI: 10.3966/102498852015063802003
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    38(2)(59-85).pdf13106KbAdobe PDF306View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback