English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49510938      Online Users : 892
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100082


    Title: Superstrings and the Euler-Kant Mirror:Deconstructing Kant’s Debut
    Other Titles: 超弦與奧義勒—康德之鏡：解構康德之首演
    Authors: Schönfeld, Martin
    Keywords: 康德;奧義勒;存有學;自然;力;超弦
    Kant;Euler;ontology;nature;force;superstrings
    Date: 2005-01
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 15:22:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 康德早年 (1747-1763) 的自然哲學甚至連歷史學者都很少去讀，但現在卻被稱譽為當代物理學和宇宙論中「現今各模型的精髓」。本文要解構一個以訛傳訛的看法，認為早期的康德只是一位平庸的思想家，並且徹底考察康德存有論的現代科學意義。學界的老套意見有下面幾點困難無法解釋：一、康德在大學會因為來自基督教的反對克勞岑(Knutzen) 而學業失利，二、康德最早關於教學形式上的靈感是得自一位中國專家比爾芬格(Bilfinger)，三、康德表達他對一位數學家歐以樂 (Euler) 的想法的同意而後者的作品近年來導致物理學上的超弦理論革命。本文焦點正是康德早年與奧義勒的關係以及對他的回應，特別是康德1756年論「物性單子」的博士論文裡。我主張康德成功結合起他自己的和奧義勒的觀點，而且康德的存有論正是今天的超弦理論和M理論的一面早期的鏡子，如同奧義勒的貝塔函數（beta function）曾是這些理論的數學鑰匙般。
    Kant`s early philosophy of nature (1747-1763) is seldom read even by historians but happens to be praised as "the essence of modern models" in contemporary physics and cosmology. The paper deconstructs the misleading cliche of the early Kant as a mediocre thinker and explores the current scientific significance of Kant`s ontology. The scholarly cliche has difficulties explaining that (1) Kant failed at the university because of Christian opposition (Knutzen), that (2) Kant`s early inspiration about heuristic form was by a China-expert (Bilfinger), and that (3) Kant expressed his agreement with the ideas of a mathematician whose work recently led to the superstring revolution (Euler). The focus of the paper is Kant`s early relation and response to Euler, specifically Kant`s dissertation on "physical monads" (1756). I argue that Kant succeeds at joining his and Euler`s perspectives, and that Kant`s ontology is as much of an early mirror of superstring- and M-theory today as Euler`s beta function was their mathematical key.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 13, 92-124
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    13-92-124.pdf174KbAdobe PDF2418View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback