English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47846697      Online Users : 61
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100133


    Title: 康德、胡塞爾和謝勒在倫理學建基問題上的爭執
    Other Titles: The Dispute of Kant, Husserl and Scheler Regarding the Foundation of Ethics
    Authors: 張偉
    ZHANG, Wei
    Keywords: 理性先天;情感先天;倫理學的建基;康德;胡塞爾
    Rational a Priori;Emotional a Priori;the Foundation of Ethics;I. Kant;E. Husserl
    Date: 2012-07
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 16:07:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 藉由倫理學開端上的初始爭論人們可以追問：倫理學究竟建基於理性或是情感？在康德倫理學中，通過道德判斷原則和道德執行原則的區分，他規定了理性和情感在倫理學中各自的功能，並且最終堅持倫理學的理性先天原則。然而，胡塞爾和謝勒卻宣稱，康德沒有認清情感領域中的先天本質法則性。相對於康德，他們通過質料先天理論揭示了情感領域中的先天性。但與胡塞爾繼續高舉理性大旗，終而將倫理學視為「第二哲學」不同，謝勒張揚了情感的獨立性、原本性，並將其倫理學建基於此種先天-情感之上，據此堅持了現象學倫理學的絕對的、第一性地位。
    Due to the dispute on the origin of ethics, one can ask such a question, whether ethics is grounded on reason or feeling/emotion. In Kant’s ethics, he determined the functions of reason and feeling/emotion in ethics by the distinction of the principle of judgment of morality and the principle of execution of morality, and eventually held to a principle of “rational a priori”. However, Husserl and Scheler believed that Kant disregarded the a priori essential laws of feeling. In contrast with Kant, they revealed the a priori in the fields of feeling/emotion by the theory of material a priori. Husserl held the flag of reason high and finally regarded ethics as “secondary philosophy”. But Scheler did not follow him. He revealed the independence and primacy of feeling/emotion, and founded his ethics on the apriori-emotion. Thus, he held on the absolute, primary status of the phenomenological ethics.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 28, 131-180
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    28-131-180.pdf574KbAdobe PDF2255View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback