English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48023200      Online Users : 1312
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100136


    Title: 最佳說明推論如何證成?:以達爾文《物種源始》中的論證作為案例研究
    Other Titles: How to Justify Inference to the Best Explanation?: An Inquiry Based on Darwin’s Argument in The Origin of Species
    Authors: 王榮麟
    WANG, Rong-Lin
    Keywords: 最佳說明推論;科學方法論;證成;達爾文;《物種源始》
    Inference to the Best Explanation;Scientific Methodology;Justification;Darwin;Origin of Species
    Date: 2013-01
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 16:08:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 根據最佳說明推論規則,我們可以從最佳說明的假說,正當地推論出該假說很可能為真。這樣的推論規則,不只在日常生活中廣被使用,也在科學研究活動中屢見不鮮。我們經常根據某個假說是最佳的說明,去證成該假說很可能為真。然而,最佳說明推論的可靠性卻受到挑戰:杭格福的反對;伏爾泰的反對;以及濫竽充數論證。在本文中,我論證達爾文式的最佳說明推論可被證成,這包括了:(一)我贊成達爾文在《物種源始》中為天擇說辯護的論證,可以說成是最佳說明推論的應用。(二)但是達爾文式的最佳說明推論有個特色,即它對於何謂最佳說明設有額外的要求。(三)論證達爾文式的最佳說明推論可以回應上述三種對於最佳說明推論之可靠性的質疑,因此可被證成。
    When one infers, among available explanations, that the best one is (the most likely to be) true, she is following the rule of inference to the best explanation. Such a rule, not surprisingly, is frequently followed by ordinary people in daily life, and by scientists as well in the course of research. However, objections arise as to the justifiability of the inference to the best explanation: Hungerford’s objection; Voltaire’s objection; and the argument from a bad lot. In this paper, I argue that Darwinian Inference to the Best Explanation (DIBE) can be justified: (1) I will endorse the view that, throughout Origin of Species, Darwin’s argument for the theory of natural selection, hopefully, can be characterized as an inference to the best explanation. (2) But what is special with DIBE, as I will point out, is that it adds extra requirements on what counts as the best explanation. (3) I will argue that DIBE can meet the objections against the reliability of Inference to the best explanation, and thus that it can be justified.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 29, 79-117
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    29-79-117.pdf894KbAdobe PDF2238View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback