English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47982667      Online Users : 1146
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127306


    Title: 好奇、焦慮與因應效能對探索行為的影響效果
    The Effects of Curiosity, Anxiety, and Coping Efficacy on the Exploratory Behavior
    Authors: 何文澤
    葉光輝
    Contributors: 教育與心理研究
    Keywords: 因應效能、好奇心、探索行為、焦慮感、學習動機
    Date: 2018-06
    Issue Date: 2019-11-13 16:14:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 好奇心一向被認為是人類探索未知的驅力,Spielberger與Starr(1994)提出探索行為雙歷程理論(dual process theory of exploratory behavior),主張新奇事物會引發個體的好奇心,驅使其探索該刺激,但也可能引發個體的焦慮感,迫使其遠離該刺激。兩者的作用效果相互拮抗,共同決定個體是否持續探索該刺激。然而,過去研究並未直接驗證此理論觀點,本研究設計了實驗直接檢證之,並納入社會認知理論的自我效能觀點,操弄參與者對新奇事物的因應效能,影響個體的焦慮感。參與者共86位,隨機分派至實驗組或控制組。參與者需對未知的抽象畫評定好奇程度、焦慮程度與探索意願。結果顯示:對畫作的好奇度與焦慮度能共同預測個體探索意願的高低,支持了雙歷程理論。另外,比起因應效能較低的畫,個體對因應效能較高的畫作較不焦慮,亦更願意探索,但好奇度則無變化,代表因應效能會影響個體的焦慮感。未來可將研究結果應用在教育課程設計上,結合學習動機理論,測量學生的好奇與焦慮傾向,識別容易不想探索新課程的學生與背後的原因。另一方面,創新的課程或教學方式對高焦慮的學生不一定有幫助。若學生的因應效能較低,創新課程與教法會讓學生過度焦慮,裹足不前。
    Curiosity is the drive to unknown. Spielberger and Starr (1994) proposed the dual process theory of exploratory behavior, indicating that novel stimuli triggered one’s curiosity to explore it, and triggered one’s anxiety to avoid it. They co-determined the duration and intensity of exploratory behavior. However, no any past study directly validated the theory. This study not only tested this theory but also integrated the perspective of social cognition theory, introducing coping efficacy to the framework. Manipulated coping efficacy of novel stimuli would influence one’s anxiety and then his exploratory behavior. Eighty-six participants were randomly assigned to two experiment groups and a control group. Facing two titles of abstract paintings, participants reported their degree of curiosity, anxiety, and the willingness to explore them. Results showed that the combination of curiosity and anxiety of paintings predicted the willingness to explore paintings, supporting the dual process theory. In experiment groups, participants felt less anxious toward and more willing to explore the higher coping efficacy painting than the lower one, indicating the theoretical importance of coping efficacy in the context of learning motivation. There are potential applications of the results in curriculum design. Measuring students’ deposition of curiosity and anxiety would indicate students that easily withdraw from learning and the reason behind their withdrawal. Moreover, innovative learning material might backfire on high anxious students, making them more anxious.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 41(2), 59-80
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    10.pdf3825KbAdobe PDF2167View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback