English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46344727      Online Users : 589
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139677


    Title: 從宗密的「靈知」到朱熹的「主宰」：儒佛思想影響史的方法論反思與新發現
    From Zongmi`s Divinatory Knowing to Zhu Xi`s Sovereignty of Moral Agency: New Findings and Methodology about the Interaction between Buddhism and Confucianism
    Authors: 鄭澤綿
    Zheng, Zemian
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 朱熹 ;宗密 ;自性本用 ;主宰 ;中和之悟 
    Zhu Xi ;Zongmi ;Chan Buddhism ;sovereignty ;the enlightenment of centrality and harmony
    Date: 2022-01
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 16:00:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 關於宗密影響了宋明理學的論述大多似是而非。可以確定的是朱子注「明德」所用的「虛靈不昧」受到宗密的「靈知」思想的影響。本文遍舉朱子提及宗密知字之處（如：論述涵養先於省察、與論述天之主宰義），以佐證此結論。朱子哲學超越宗密之處是：從宗密知字中點出「知覺」中自有「主宰」，這是朱子中和之悟的關鍵，由此建立了心統性情、敬貫動靜之說。朱子與宗密都熱衷於探索心之體之在自身的狀態，朱子涵養未發之知覺主宰，可類比於宗密之「自性本用」之寂知。佛教語境使宗密不能正面講主宰義，而朱子能正面建立道德主體概念。學界往往把朱子學類比於唯識宗或北宗禪，筆者認為宜將朱子類比於宗密，而朱陸的工夫論之爭可以類比於同為南宗禪的宗密之菏澤宗與馬祖之洪州宗之異。
    Most of the theories about how Zongmi influenced Zhu Xi are ill-grounded. The only reliable thesis is that Zhu Xi`s ＂xulingbumei＂ (vacuous, divinatory and not beclouded) in his commentary on ＂the brilliant virtue＂ in the Great Learning is borrowed from Zongmi`s ＂divinatory knowing.＂ In order to support this claim, I examine all the passages where Zhu Xi refers to Zongmi and his concept of knowing. Zhu Xi mentions them when he contends that the Huxiang School fails to see that the practice of seriousness (keeping the sovereign awake) should precede the observation of the manifestation of the heart/mind, and when Zhu Xi talks about the heart/mind of the Heaven. This is difficult to interpret. I submit that Zhu Xi surpasses Zongmi when he finds that the divinatory knowing contains in itself the power of ＂sovereignty＂ by which the heart/mind can maintain its ideal state. This breakthrough of Zhu Xi is the motive when Zhu Xi proposes his theory that ＂the heart/mind comprises/commands the nature and feelings＂ and that ＂seriousness penetrates tranquility and activity.＂ Both Zhu Xi and Zongmi seek to experience the state of the substance of the heart/mind in itself. Zhu Xi`s ＂preserving knowing and sovereignty＂ in the state of ＂not-yet-activated＂ is comparable to Zongmi`s notion of ＂vacuous knowing＂ as the ＂original functioning of the nature itself.＂ Zongmi`s Buddhist context restricts him from positively talking about one`s inner sovereignty, while Zhu Xi`s Confucian context encourages it. Zhu Xi criticizes his master Cheng Yi, and insist that there is clear awareness in the ideal not-yet-activated state. Zhu Xi`s philosophy should be compared to Zongmi, not to the Yogācāra School or the Northern Chan. The debates between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan on the methods of self-cultivation is comparable to the debates between Zong Mi`s Heze School and Mazu`s Hongzhou School.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 47, 1-49
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202201_(47).0001
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202201_(47).0001
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100.pdf1299KbAdobe PDF2156View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback