Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143777
|
| Title: | 以英語作為外語的閱讀課堂之多模態應用：行動研究
Multimodal Practices in EFL Reading Classroom: Action Research |
| Authors: | 黃品雯
Huang, Pinwen |
| Contributors: | 劉怡君
Yichun Liu
黃品雯
Huang, Pinwen |
| Keywords: | 多模態
以英語作為外語的課堂
閱讀理解
行動研究
Multimodality
EFL Classroom
Reading Comprehension
Action Research |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-03-09 18:24:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 多模態研究已經在不同的學習階段受到關注，其中多種模式的應用能夠增強學生的識字能力和閱讀理解，這些模式不僅限於言語、手勢、姿勢及課堂動線。然而，過往的研究缺乏對台灣英語閱讀課堂的調查。本研究描述一位台灣高中英文老師如何透過協同行動研究發展多模態素養，以提高各程度學生的閱讀理解能力。資料搜集包含前後測、問卷調查、課堂錄像、學生訪談、教師反思、課堂教材等。整個研究遵循行動研究的週期，從計劃、行動、觀察到反思，歷時四個月。結果表明教師在每個週期中使用的多樣化模式，含語碼轉換、停頓、注視、空間移動和線上資源等，逐漸創造出一個互動學習環境，且增強學生的學習能動性以進行意義協商。老師不僅提高了學生的閱讀理解能力，還促進他們在詞彙、文法以及閱讀策略上的多模態練習。該研究進一步討論，儘管在多模態教學中採用多種模式，教師必須轉變思維方式並重新思考多模態的核心價值，也就是讓學生通過社會互動產生意義。文末提供一些教學啟示幫助英語授課教師創建以學生為中心的多模態課堂，例如適當地採用跨語言實踐來增強學生的學習。
Multimodal studies have gained attention in different learning phases, where a multiplicity of modes is applied to increase students’ literacy and reading comprehension, including but not limited to speech, gestures, postures, and classroom movements. However, previous research lacked investigation of EFL reading classrooms in Taiwan. This study illustrates how a Taiwanese high school English teacher developed her multimodal literacy through collaborative action research to improve all level students’ reading comprehension. The data was collected quantitively and qualitatively through pre- and post-tests, and a questionnaire, as well as videotaping the class, students’ interviews, the teacher’s reflections, and all the teaching materials. The entire research followed the action research cycle, from planning, action, observation, and reflection, which lasted four months. Results highlighted that the teacher’s diverse use of modes in each cycle, including code-switching, pausing, eye gazing, spatial movements, and online technology resources, gradually created an interactive learning environment that empowered learner agency for meaning-making negotiation. The teacher not only improved students’ reading comprehension but also promoted their multimodal practices in vocabulary, grammar, and reading strategies. The study further
discussed that despite applying various modes of multimodal teaching, teachers must transform their mindset and reconsider the core value of multimodality for students to make
meaning through social interactions. Pedagogical implications are provided to help EMI teachers create a student-centered multimodal classroom, such as employing translanguaging
practices appropriately to enhance students’ learning. |
| Reference: | Adami, E., & Kress, G. (2014). Introduction: Multimodality, meaning making, and the issue of “text”. Text & Talk, 34(3), 231-237.
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.
Amin, M. (2019). Developing reading skills through effective reading approaches. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 4(1), 35-40.
Anderson, N. J. (2014). Developing engaged second language readers. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign
Language (4th ed.) (pp. 170-188). National Geographic Learning.
Asikcan, M., & Saban, A. (2021). An Action Research on Improving Fluent Reading Skills of Third-Grade Primary School Students. Education and Science, 46(205), 19-48.
Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook with associated on-line course. Equinox.
Bateman, J. A. (2011). The decomposability of semiotic modes. In K. L. O’Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal Studies: Multiple Approaches and Domains (pp. 17-38). Routledge.
Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and instruction, 2(2), 131-156.
Berg, A., Cressman, K. S., & Pfanz, T. (1998). Improving Reading Comprehension through Vocabulary.
Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2010). Multimodal analysis: Key issues. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 180-197). Bloomsbury.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of educational psychology, 88(1), 18-37.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm?. Language teaching, 38(2), 57-74.
Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Büyükduman, İ., & Şirin, S. (2010). Learning portfolio (LP) to enhance constructivism and student autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 55-61.
Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught?. Australian review of applied linguistics, 21(1), 1-20.
Carrell, P. L., & Carson, J. G. (1997). Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting. English for specific purposes, 16(1), 47-60.
Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Eds.). (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge University Press.
Clift, R., Veal, M. L., Johnson, M., & Holland, P. (1990). Restructuring teacher education through collaborative action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 52-62.
Constantinou, O. (2005). Multimodal discourse analysis: Media, modes and technologies. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 602-618.
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S25-S44.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of education, 189(1-2), 107-122.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction, 6(4), 126-135.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by Ear and by Eye (pp. 331-358). MIT Press.
Grabe, W. (2004). 3. Research on teaching reading. Annual review of applied linguistics, 24, 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000030
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold. Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hart, E. R., & Speece, D. L. (1998). Reciprocal teaching goes to college: Effects for postsecondary students at risk for academic failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 670.
Hiebert, E. H. (2020). The core vocabulary: The foundation of proficient comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 73(6), 757-768.
Hiippala, T. (2017). An overview of research within the Genre and Multimodality framework. Discourse, context & media, 20, 276-284.
Horasan, S. (2014). Code-switching in EFL classrooms and the perceptions of the students and teachers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 31-45.
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Jakonen, T., & Evnitskaya, N. (2020). Teacher smiles as an interactional and pedagogical resource in the classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 163, 18-31.
Jiang, L., Yu, S., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Incorporating digital multimodal composing through collaborative action research: challenges and coping strategies. Technology, Pedagogy
and Education, 1-17.
Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107-119.
Kamil, M. L., & Pearson, P. D. (1979). Theory and Practice in Teaching Reading. New York University Education Quarterly, 10(2), 10-16.
Kelley, M. J., & Clausen-Grace, N. (2007). Comprehension Shouldn’t Be Silent: From Strategy Instruction to Student Independence. International Reading Association.
Kemmis, S. (2008). Critical theory and participatory action research. The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, 2(2008), 121-138.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. (2007). Comprehension in preschool and early elementary children: Skill development and strategy interventions.
In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27-45). Psychology Press.
Klein, M. L. (1988). Teaching Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary: A Guide for Teachers. Prentice Hall.
Ko, M. H. (2012). Glossing and second language vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly,46(1), 56-79.
Kozminsky, E., & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational
levels?. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(2), 187-204.
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.
Kress, G. (2013). Multimodal discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 61-76). Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford University Press.
Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R., & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219-232.
International Baccalaureate Organization. (n.d.). Diploma Programme (DP). International Baccalaureate®. https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/
LeVine, P., & Scollon, R. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Georgetown University Press.
Lim, V. F. (2019). Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis approach. Social Semiotics, 29(1), 83-111.
Lim, F. V. (2021). Investigating intersemiosis: a systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse. Visual
Communication, 20(1), 34-58.
Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of educational psychology, 94(4), 778-784.
Martinec, R. (2004). Gestures that co‐occur with speech as a systematic resource: the realization of experiential meanings in indexes. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 193-213.
McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (1988). Learning vocabulary: Different ways for different goals. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 42-46.
McMullen, J. M., Martin, R., Jones, J., & Murtagh, E. M. (2016). Moving to learn Ireland–Classroom teachers’ experiences of movement integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 321-330.
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of developmental education, 25(3), 2-11.
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics, 145, 47-62.
Norris, S. (2004a). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. Routledge.
Norris, S. (2004b). Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A Conceptual Framework. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 101-115). Georgetown University Press.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 120-137). Bloomsbury.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Romar, J. E., Björkgren, M., Snellman, J. E., Ruostekoski, A., Harjunpää, P., & Juslenius, V. (2020). Preservice secondary subject teachers incorporating movement integration into classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103-119.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of educational research, 64(4), 479-530.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 864-894). International Reading Association.
Sagor, R. (1992). How to Conduct Collaborative Action Research. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1988). Models of the reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp.
24-36). Cambridge University Press.
Sharifi, M., Soleimani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2017). E portfolio evaluation and vocabulary learning: Moving from pedagogy to andragogy. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 48(6), 1441-1450.
Shepard-Carey, L. (2020). Making sense of comprehension practices and pedagogies in multimodal ways: A second-grade emergent bilingual’s sensemaking during small-group reading. Linguistics and Education, 55, 100777.
Shiotsu, T. (2010). Components of L2 reading: Linguistic and processing factors in the reading test performances of Japanese EFL learners (Vol. 32). Cambridge University Press.
Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24(1), 99-128.
Şimşek, M. R. (2010). The effects of L1 use in the teaching of L2 grammar concepts on the students’ achievement. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 6(2), 142-169.
Smith, C. B. (2003). Vocabulary Development: Elaboration for Writing. ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED, 480, 888.
Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. L. F. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning
and instruction, 19(3), 272-286.
Tan, X., & Matsuda, P. K. (2020). Teacher beliefs and pedagogical practices of integrating multimodality into first-year composition. Computers and Composition, 58, 102614.
The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.
Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
Wilson, A. A., Boatright, M. D., & Landon-Hays, M. (2014). Middle school teachers’ discipline-specific use of gestures and implications for disciplinary literacy instruction.
Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 234-262.
Yandell, J. (2008). Embodied Readings: Exploring the Multimodal Social Semiotic Resources of the English Classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 7(1), 36-56.
Yandell, J. (2011). Reading in a secondary English classroom: agency, interest and multimodal design. Visual Communication, 10(1), 87-101.
Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text & Talk, 34(3), 349-375. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
109551007 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109551007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 100701.pdf | | 17676Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 119 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
