English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118590/149640 (79%)
Visitors : 79641690      Online Users : 1166
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158754


    Title: 華語客體量變動詞短語未完成義之實證性研究
    Incompleteness of incremental theme VPs in Mandarin Chinese: an experimental study
    Authors: 廖俞涵
    Liao, Yu-Han
    Contributors: 陳仲妤
    Chen, Chung-Yu
    廖俞涵
    Liao, Yu-Han
    Keywords: 客體量變動詞短語
    完成動詞
    完整體標記「了」
    終結性
    Incremental theme VPs
    Accomplishment verbs
    Perfective aspect marker -le
    Event Completion
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 15:32:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 華語中的完成動詞(如「寫一封信」與「吃一個蘋果」)在與完整體標記「了」搭配時通常會有事件完成之意,然並非所有完成動詞在搭配完整體標記「了」後事件皆需要完成,客體量變動詞短語搭配「了」的「動詞+了+限定詞+名詞」結構即為一類,其事件完成是否必要與其「動詞種類」、「限定詞種類」與「名詞種類」有關,在某些特定條件下,華語客體量變動詞短語在完整體下允許事件未完成的解讀。
    由於現有研究中,關於何種條件會使客體量變動詞短語允許未完成義之討論以理論為主:一般認為,動詞種類為「創造動詞」(如「寫一封信」)時,相較於動詞種類為「消耗動詞」(如「吃一個蘋果」)時不容易允許未完成解讀,而限定詞為「指示詞」或「一」時,相較於限定詞為其他數詞時更容易允許未完成解讀。在理論性研究之外,實證性研究較少,且這些少數的實證性研究僅聚焦在限定詞為「指示詞」或「數詞」的差異,並未探討不同數詞間的差別,且對於動詞類型是否影響未完成義的解讀仍不清楚。
    針對以上研究缺口,本研究聚焦在限定詞為「數詞+量詞」結構之客體量變動詞短語,透過改變「動詞+了+數詞+量詞+名詞」中的「數詞種類」與「動詞種類」,在「圖片判斷測驗」與「二元接受度測驗」兩個實驗中,測試華語母語者對於「動詞+了+數詞+量詞+名詞」事件完成與事件未完成解讀的接受度。
    研究結果部分,本研究總共有41位資料有效的受試者,實驗結果顯示「數詞種類」會影響在兩個實驗中對「動詞+了+數詞+量詞+名詞」未完成解讀的接受度,當數詞為「一」時的接受度低於數詞為「三」時的接受度。另一方面,「動詞種類」則不一定,在「圖片判斷測驗」中,動詞為「創造動詞」時的接受度較動詞為「消耗動詞」高,在「二元接受度測驗」中則差異不大。因此,無論是關於「數詞種類」還是「動詞種類」,本研究之研究結果皆不符合根據現有理論性研究而建立的假設,推測為任務效應之緣故,因此有待未來針對實驗方式進行改善。
    In Mandarin Chinese, accomplishment verbs (eg. xie yi feng xin “write a letter” and chi yi ge pingguo “eat an apple”) combined with the perfective aspect marker -le typically indicate event completion. However, not all accomplishment verbs, when paired with "-le," necessitate the completion of the event. Incremental theme VPs with perfective marker “-le”, structured as "Verb + -le + Determiner + Noun," represent a category where the necessity of event completion depends on the verb type, quantifier type, and noun type. Under specific conditions, these phrases may allow interpretations where the event is not completed.
    Current research mainly examines this phenomenon from a theoretical perspective. Generally, it is believed that when the verb type is a "creation verb" (eg. xie yi feng xin “write a letter”), it is less likely to allow an incomplete interpretation compared to when the verb type is a "consumption verb" (eg. chi yi ge pingguo “eat an apple”). Additionally, when the determiner is a "demonstrative" or "one," it is more likely to allow an incomplete interpretation than when the determiner is another numeral. However, beyond these theoretical studies, empirical research remains relatively scarce. Moreover, these few empirical studies focus on differences when the determiner is a demonstrative or a numeral, without exploring variations among different numerals. The influence of verb types on the interpretation of event completion remains unclear.
    Addressing these gaps, this study focuses on incremental theme VPs with a "Numeral + Classifier" structure. By manipulating the “verb type” and the “numeral type” in the "Verb + -le + Numeral + Classifier + Noun" construction, the study examines Mandarin native speakers' acceptance of event completion and non-completion interpretations through a Picture Judgment Task and a Binary Acceptability Judgment Task.
    Based on data from 41 participants, the experimental findings indicate that "numeral type" influenced participants' acceptance of the incomplete interpretation of the structure "verb + -le + numeral + classifier + noun" in both experiments. Specifically, when the numeral was "one”, acceptance was lower than when the numeral was "three." On the other hand, the impact of "verb type" varied. In the "picture judgment task," acceptance was higher when the verb was a "creative verb" compared to when it was a "consumptive verb", whereas in the "binary acceptability judgment task," the difference was minimal. Therefore, the study’s findings regarding both "numeral type" and "verb type" do not align with hypotheses based on existing theoretical research. This discrepancy is presumed to be due to task effects, highlighting the need for future refinement of the experimental methodology.
    Reference: Czardybon A., Fleischhauer J. (2014). Definiteness and perfectivity in telic incremental theme predications. In D. Gerland, C Horn, A Latrouite, A Ortmann (eds.), Meaning and Grammar of Nouns and Verbs, (pp. 373–400). Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
    Chen, C.-Y. (2018). Termination or completion in Mandarin perfective accomplishment VPs: An experimental study. Talk given at the 30th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-30), March 9-11. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
    Declerck, R. (2007). Distinguishing between the aspectual categories “(a)telic”, “(im)perfective” and “(non)bounded”. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 29, 48–64.
    Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Boston: Harvard University Press.
    Kennedy, C. (2012). The composition of incremental change. In V. Demonte & L. McNally (Eds.), Telicity, change, state: A cross-categorical view of event structure (pp. 103–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Koenig, J. P., & Chief, L. C. (2008). Scalarity and state-changes in Mandarin (and other languages). In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo-Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 7, (pp. 241–262). Paris: CSSP.
    Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Li, T. (2019). Incomplete perfectivity and its acquisition in Mandarin Chinese. Master’s thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    Martin, F. (2019). Non-culminating accomplishments. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(8), 1–20.
    Ogiela, D. (2007). Development of telicity interpretation: Sensitivity to verb-type and determiner-type. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
    Peck, J., Lin, J., & Sun, C. (2016). A Scalar Analysis of Chinese Incremental Theme VP. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, 26, 216–246.
    Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In E. Doron, M. Rappaport Hovav, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure (pp. 21–38). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
    Rothstein, S. (2001). What are Incremental Themes? In: J. Gerhard, A. S. Strigin, S. Wilder and N. Zhang (eds.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 22, 139–157.
    Segaert, K. (2020). Priming effects. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4027–4030). Springer-Verlag.
    Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect / by Carlota S. Smith. (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Soh, H. L., & Kuo, J. Y. C. (2005). Perfective aspect and accomplishment situations in Mandarin Chinese. In H. Verkuyl, H. Swart, & A. Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect (pp. 199–216). Kluwer.
    Tai, H.-Y. J. (1984). Verbs and Times in Chinese: Vendler's Four Categories. In D. Testen, V. Mishra, & J. Drogo (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics (pp. 289–296). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The philosophical review, 66(2), 143–160.
    Verkuyl, H. J. (1989). Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and philosophy, 39–94.
    Xu, J., & Schmitt, C. (2024). Demonstratives but not verbs cause non-culmination in Mandarin incremental-theme predicates: Evidence from children and adults. Poster presented at the 42nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 42), Berkeley.
    Zhang, A. (2020). Referentiality, individuation and incompletive readings. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 29, 435–468.
    林若望(2002)。論現代漢語時制的意義。Language and Linguistics。3.1:1–25。
    張麗麗、陳克健、黃居仁(2000)。漢語動詞詞彙語意分析:表達模式與研究方法。Computational Linguistics,5(1),1–18。
    鄧守信(2019)。 當代中文語法點全集 (二版)。 聯經出版事業公司。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    華語文教學碩博士學位學程
    112161001
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112161001
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[華語文教學博/碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100101.pdf8519KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback