資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158984
|
| 題名: | 《亨利四世》、《奧塞羅》、《一報還一報》、《暴風雨》中的榮譽
Honor in Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Othello, Measure for Measure, and The Tempest |
| 作者: | 陳允
Chen, Yun |
| 貢獻者: | 姜翠芬
Jiang, Tsui-Fen
陳允
Chen, Yun |
| 關鍵詞: | 榮譽
寬恕
基督教
和解
honor
forgiveness
Christian
reconciliation |
| 日期: | 2025 |
| 上傳時間: | 2025-09-01 14:36:48 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 本論文探討莎士比亞戲劇中「榮譽」這一多面向的概念，以及其對主角行為、決策與最終命運的深遠影響。在莎士比亞的作品中，榮譽不僅僅侷限於戰爭中的獎賞，更延伸至內在的道德操守與外在的社會聲望。
本研究區分了基督教的榮譽觀——根植於個人與上帝的關係及道德正義——與文藝復興時期的榮譽理想，後者強調個人美德、高貴血統與公眾評價。莎士比亞巧妙地將這些倫理框架編織進角色的兩難處境，展現榮譽既是個人的道德指南，也是社會的衡量標準。
本論文聚焦於《亨利四世》、《奧賽羅》、《一報還一報》與《暴風雨》四部重要劇作，探討對榮譽的追求如何形塑劇情發展與角色命運。在《亨利四世》中，霍特斯波、福斯塔夫與哈爾王子對榮譽的不同態度，反映出亞里斯多德關於美德為極端之間平衡的思想。《奧賽羅》則深入探討榮譽在被個人復仇操弄時的毀滅性潛力；《一報還一報》則審視榮譽背景下正義與寬恕之間的張力。《暴風雨》最終呈現和解的願景，主角普洛斯彼羅放下復仇，選擇寬恕，暗示出一種根植於仁慈的更高層次榮譽。
本論文參考了柯蒂斯·布朗·華森（Curtis Brown Watson）與諾曼·康索（Norman Council）等學者的研究，將莎士比亞對榮譽的處理置於更廣泛的哲學與歷史脈絡中，並涉及馬基維利及亞里斯多德、柏拉圖等古典思想家的觀點。最終，本文認為莎士比亞對榮譽的描繪，從武勇到道德和解，體現了對人性與倫理責任的細膩理解，並強調真正的榮譽不在於對名聲的無盡追逐，而在於美德的培養與寬恕的能力。
This dissertation explores the multifaceted concept of honor in Shakespeare’s plays and its profound influence on the actions, decisions, and ultimate destinies of his protagonists. In Shakespeare’s works, honor is not limited to the rewards of warfare but extends to encompass both internal moral integrity and external social reputation.
The study distinguishes between the Christian notion of honor—rooted in one’s relationship with God and moral righteousness—and the Renaissance ideal, which emphasizes personal virtue, noble lineage, and public esteem. Shakespeare skillfully weaves these ethical frameworks into his characters’ dilemmas, illustrating how honor serves as both a personal moral compass and a societal standard.
Focusing on four major plays—Henry IV, Othello, Measure for Measure, and The Tempest—, this dissertation examines how the pursuit of honor shapes the narrative and the characters’ fates. In Henry IV, the contrasting attitudes toward honor among Hotspur, Falstaff, and Prince Hal reflect Aristotelian ideas of virtue as a balance between extremes. Othello examines into the destructive potential of honor when manipulated for personal revenge, while Measure for Measure discusses the tension between justice and mercy within the context of honor. The Tempest ultimately presents a vision of reconciliation, where the protagonist Prospero abandons vengeance in favor of forgiveness, suggesting a higher form of honor rooted in mercy.
Drawing on the works of scholars such as Curtis Brown Watson and Norman Council, the dissertation situates Shakespeare’s treatment of honor within broader philosophical and historical contexts, including references to Machiavelli and classical thinkers like Aristotle and Plato. Ultimately, the study implies that Shakespeare’s evolving portrayal of honor—from martial valor to moral reconciliation—reflects a nuanced understanding of human nature and ethical responsibility, asserting that true honor lies not in the relentless pursuit of reputation, but in the cultivation of virtue and the capacity for forgiveness. |
| 參考文獻: | Alvis, John. Shakespeare’s Understanding of Honor. Carolina Academic P, 1990.
---. “Shakespeare’s Understandings of Honor: Morally Absolute, Politically Relative.” Souls with Longing: Representations of Honor and Love in Shakespeare, edited by Bernard J. Dobski and Dustin A. Gish, Lexington Books, 2011
Aquinas, St. Thomas. The Summa Contra Gentiles. Translated by The English Dominican Fathers from the Latest Leonine Edition, 4 vols. Burns Oates & Washbourne, 1928.
Aristotle. Art of Rhetoric. Translated by J. H. Freese. Harvard UP, 2020.
---. Nichomachean Ethics. Translated by W. D. Ross. Clarendon, 1926. Internet Classics Archive, n.d., http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.2.ii.html.
---. Politics. Translated by Reeve C. D. C. Hackett P, 2017.
Ashley, Robert. Of Honour. Huntington Library P, 1947.
Augustine, Saint. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick, Oxford UP, 1991.
Bacon, Francis. “The Essay.” British Library, 20 Apr. 2022, https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/bacons-essays-on-revenge-envy-and-deformity.
Barton, Carlin A. Roman Honor: The Fire in the Bones. U of California P, 2001.
Berkeley, David, and Donald Edison. “The Theme of Henry IV, Part 1.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 19, 1968, pp. 25-31.
Billington, Michael. “Othello – review.” The Guardian, 23 Apr. 2013, www.theguardian.com/stage/2013/apr/23/othello-national-theatre-review.
---. “The Tempest, RSC, Stratford-upon-Avon, review: ’Simon Russell Beale is a masterful Prospero’.” The Guardian, 18 Nov. 2016, www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/nov/18/the-tempest-review-rsc-stratford-upon-avon-simon-russell-beale.
Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. Riverhead Books, 1998.
Boorman, S. C. Human Conflict in Shakespeare. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987.
Boorman, Stanley. “Reconciliation and Forgiveness in The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, 1983, pp. 145-160.
Bowers, Fredson T. Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, 1587-1642. Princeton UP, 1940.
Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Macmillan, 1992.
Brown, Mark. “South African Tempest brings apartheid allegory to Stratford.” The Guardian, 19 Feb. 2009, www.theguardian.com/stage/2009/feb/19/tempest-stratford-apartheid.
Bryson, F. R. The Sixteenth-Century Italian Duel: A Study in Renaissance Social History. U of Chicago P, 1938.
Campbell, Lily Bess. Theories of Revenge in Renaissance England. U of Chicago P, 1930.
Castellio, Sebastian. Concerning Heretics. Translated by Roland H. Bainton. Octagon, 1935.
Castiglione, Baldassarre. The Book of the Courtier. Andesite P, 2015.
Cavendish, Dominic. “Othello, RSC, review: ’electrifying’.” The Telegraph, 5 June 2015, www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/theatre-reviews/11652713/Othello-RSC-review-electrifying.html.
---. “Measure for Measure, Donmar Warehouse, review: a #MeToo-era triumph.” The Telegraph, 17 Oct. 2018, www.telegraph.co.uk/theatre/what-to-see/measure-measure-donmar-warehouse-review-metoo-era-triumph/.
Charles, Taylor. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard UP, 1989.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De officiis. Translated by Walter Miller. Harvard UP, 1913.
---. De Amicitia. Translated by Armistead William Falconer. Harvard UP, 1923.
Council, Norman. When Honour’s at the Stake. 1st ed., Routledge, 2014.
Cox, John D. Shakespeare and Religion. Religions, vol. 9, no. 11, 2018, article 343, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9110343.
Della Casa, Giovanni. Galateo: Or, The Rules of Polite Behavior. Translated by Konrad Eisenbichler, University of Toronto Press, 1990, p. 54.
Dusinberre, Juliet. Shakespeare and the Nature of Women. 2nd ed., Palgrave Macmillan, 1996.
Du Vair, Guillaume. The Moral Philosophie of the Stoicks. Translated by Thomas James. U of Rutgers P, 1935.
Eagleton, Terry. Shakespeare and Society: Critical Studies in Shakespearean Drama. Blackwell, 1986.
Elyot, Thomas. The Book Named the Governour. London, 1531. Internet Archive, https://dn790007.ca.archive.org/0/items/bokenamedgouerno01elyouoft/bokenamedgouerno01elyouoft.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2023.
Eustace M. Tillyard. The Elizabethan World Picture. Vintage, 1959.
Frederick II, King of Prussia. Memoirs of the House of Brandenburg and History of Prussia. Translated by Thomas Holcroft, G.G.J. and J. Robinson, 1789.
Garber, Marjorie. Shakespeare After All. Pantheon, 2004.
Gless, Darryl J. Measure for Measure, the Law, and the Convent. Princeton UP, 1979.
Goldman, Michael. Shakespeare and the Energies of Drama. Princeton UP, 1972.
Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare’s Universal Wolf: Studies in Early Modern Reification. Clarendon Press, 1996.
Graham, Kenneth J. E., and Philip D. Collington, eds. Shakespeare and Religious Change. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Granville-Barker, G. B. A Companion to Shakespeare Studies. New York, 1937.
Green, Jesse. “Review: ‘Measure for Measure’ in the Park, With a #MeToo Spin.” The New York Times, 26 July 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/theater/measure-for-measure-review.html.
Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. U of Chicago P, 1980.
---. “Invisible Bullets.” Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. U of California P, 1988, pp. 21-65.
Guicciardini, Francesco. The History of Italy. Translated by Sidney Alexander, Princeton University P, 1984.
Hadfield, Andrew. Shakespeare and Renaissance Politics. Arden Shakespeare Critical Companions, London: Arden Shakespeare, 2003.
---. Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge UP, 2005.
Hanson, Elizabeth. “Measure for Measure and the Law of Nature.” The Law in Shakespeare, edited by Constance Jordan and Karen Cunningham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Hutson, Lorna. “Imagining Justice: Kantorowicz and Shakespeare.” Representations, no. 106, 2009.
Hodgson, John A. “Desdemona’s Handkerchief as an Emblem of Her Reputation.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 19, no. 3, 1977, pp. 313-322.
Howard, Jean E. “Dramatic Realism and the Politics of the Family in Shakespeare’s History Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, 1988, pp. 123-44.
---. “Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part One: The Play of History.” The Norton Shakespeare, edited by Stephen Greenblatt, 3rd ed., W. W. Norton, 2015, pp. 1147-52.
Ji, Li. “Honor as a Unifying Resource in Othello.” Shakespeare Studies, vol. 42, 2014, pp. 410-425.
Ji, Shi. “An Analysis of Power Desire of Iago in Shakespeare’s Othello from Psychological Perspectives.” Literature and Art Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, pp. 417-421.
Ji, Yucheng. “Honor and Jealousy in Othello.” Shakespeare Studies, vol. 41, 2013, pp. 415-430.
Jordan, Constance, and Karen Cunningham, eds. The Law in Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Kaplan, Lindsay. The Culture of Slander in Early Modern England. Cambridge UP, 1987.
Keyishian, Harry. Shapes of Revenge: Victimization, Vengeance, and Vindictiveness in Shakespeare. Prometheus Books, 2003.
Kermode, Frank. Shakespeare’s Language. Allen Lane, 2000.
---. Shakespeare: The Tempest. Arden Shakespeare, 1954.
Kinney, Arthur F. Shakespeare and Cognition: Aristotle’s Legacy and Shakespearean Drama. Routledge, 2006.
Knight, G. Wilson. The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. Methuen, 1947.
---. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy with Three New Essays. Routledge, 1989.
Liu, Alan. “Performing Honor: The Politics of Shakespearean Drama.” ELH, vol. 56, no. 1, 1989, pp. 33-58.
Liu, Joseph H. “The Machiavellian Prince in Shakespeare’s Henry IV.” Shakespeare Studies, vol. 28, 2000, pp. 33-50.
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on Livy. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov, U of Chicago P, 1996.
---. The Discourses. Translated by Leslie J. Walker. Penguin, 2003.
---. The Prince. Translated by Peter Bondanella, Oxford UP, 2005.
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. “Measure for Measure and the Discourse of Sexuality.” Shakespeare and Gender: A History, edited by Deborah E. Barker and Ivo Kamps, Verso, 1995, pp. 97-115.
McAlindon, Tom. “Shakespeare’s Henry IV and the Pursuit of Honor.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, 1985, pp. 421-35.
---. “Shakespeare’s Tragic Perspective.” Shakespeare Survey, vol. 25, 1972, pp. 420-35.
McGrath, Alister E. Christian Theology: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, 1994.
Moryson, Fynes. Shakespeare’s Europe: Unpublished Chapters of Fynes Moryson’s Itinerary. Edited by Charles Hughes. London, 1903.
Orgel, Stephen. “Prospero’s Wife.” Representations, no. 8, 1984, pp. 128-136.
Petrarch, Francesco. Petrarch’s Secret; or, The Soul’s Conflict with Passion: Three Dialogues between Himself and St. Augustine. Translated by William H. Draper. Chatto & Windus, 1911.
Plantinga, Cornelius, Jr. Not the Way It’s Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1995.
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton UP, 1975.
Poisson, Rodney. “Death for Adultery: A Note on Othello, III. iii. 394-96.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, 1977, pp. 89-92.
Rosenberg, Marvin. “In Defense of Iago.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 2, 1955, pp. 145-158.
Segar, William. Honor Military and Civil. Robert Barker, 1602.
Shakespeare, William. Henry IV, Part 1 & 2. Oxford UP, 2008.
---. Henry IV, Part One. Edited by David Bevington, Oxford UP, 1998.
---. Henry IV, Part Two. Edited by René Weis, Oxford UP, 2017.
---. Henry V. Edited by T. W. Craik, Arden Shakespeare, 1995.
---. Measure for Measure. Edited by J. W. Lever, Arden Shakespeare, 1965.
---. Othello. Edited by E. A. J. Honigmann, Arden Shakespeare, 1997.
---. The Tempest. Edited by Stephen Orgel, Oxford UP, 1998.
---. The Tragedy of Macbeth. Sweet Cherry, 2012.
Shuger, Debora. “‘In a Christian Climate’: Religion and Honor in Richard II.” Shakespeare and Religious Change, edited by Kenneth J. E. Graham and Philip D. Collington, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Slights, Camille. “Slaves and Subjects in Othello.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 4, 1997, pp. 377-390.
Smith, Matthew J. “‘At War Twixt Will and Will Not’: On Shakespeare’s Idea of Religious Experience in Measure for Measure.” Religions, vol. 9, 2018.
Sokol, B.J., and Mary Sokol. Shakespeare, Law and Marriage. Cambridge UP, 2003.
Stewart, Frank Henderson. Honor. U of Chicago P, 1994.
The Holy Bible, New International Version. Zondervan, 2011.
Tillyard, E. M. W. The Elizabethan World Picture. Vintage Books, 1959.
Urban, David V., ed. Religions in Shakespeare’s Writings. MDPI, 2020
Volf, Miroslav. Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Abingdon Press, 1996.
Watson, Curtis Brown. Shakespeare and the Renaissance Concept of Honor. Princeton UP, 1960.
Whetstone, George. The Honorable Reputation of a Souldier. London, 1585. |
| 描述: | 博士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
103551503 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103551503 |
| 資料類型: | thesis |
| 顯示於類別: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 150301.pdf | 688Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
