資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159434
|
| 題名: | 文化邊界上的轉譯與轉銜：母職自我治理敘事研究
Maternal Translations and Transitions at Cultural Boundaries: A Narrative Study of Self-Governing Mothering Subjectivities |
| 作者: | 林君怡
Lin, Chun-Yi |
| 貢獻者: | 詹志禹
Chan, Chih-Yu
林君怡
Lin, Chun-Yi |
| 關鍵詞: | 敘事研究方法論
女性主義方法論
母職主體性
母性或母職轉譯
母性或母職轉銜
Narrative Methodology
Feminist Methodology
mothering subjectivities
maternal translations
maternal transition |
| 日期: | 2025 |
| 上傳時間: | 2025-09-01 17:02:25 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 本研究以母職自我治理圖像，瞭解遭遇地理移動與文化邊界的母親，其母職實踐於社會文化與家庭治理的挑戰與困境；分析歷經母性或母職於轉譯及轉銜的母親，其自我歷程於母性思考及關懷倫理間的動態關係。母性或母職是作為母親的狀態，本研究以母職主體性（mothering subjectivities）縱貫敘事研究方法，以主體經驗、脈絡化分析，以及反身性為基礎，深度理解並詮釋母職作為一種持續的實踐，並著重主體在此實踐中持續動態建構自身經驗與位置的過程。文化邊界（cultural boundaries）不只是現象，更描述了母親們在兩種不同文化之間的互動與適應。轉譯（maternal translations），並非專指語言上的翻譯，而是源於後結構主義與人文社會科學，兼及意義轉譯與文化翻譯；轉銜（maternal transition）不只是變換狀態的階段，更描述了母親在不同環境變化的情境脈絡中，如何重新協商與調整母職角色、創造新的支持網絡，以及在多元文化情境下形塑的獨特實踐。
母職主體性的自我治理（self-governing）是母親在特定社會文化脈絡中，內化規訓性話語後對自身情感、行為與道德責任的主動管理與自我監控。源自Michel Foucault的治理術（governmentality），強調母親不只是受外在制度約束，更會在無形中自我規訓，以符合理想化的母職形象。對於身處跨文化場域的母親而言，這種自我治理更顯複雜。她們同時面對來自不同文化的語言與教養期待，必須在文化規範與個人實踐中不斷協商與轉譯其主體性。不同的語言教學策略，如外包、自教、共學或自主學習，不只是教育選擇，更是母職倫理與性別責任重新界定的實踐場域。
本研究在敘事研究方法兼採由女性主義出發的整合共構理論基礎與方法論架構下，提出「母職路徑流動系譜」與「離散倫理關懷」兩項核心觀察與詮釋。系譜源自Foucault的系譜學，強調主體經驗形成的非線性、多元性與動態性。本研究試圖透過三部曲式的分析路徑：建構圖像、解構話語、重構主體，勾勒出母職主體性的生成過程。並以母職路徑流動系譜指出母職主體性並非固定而穩定的實體，而是在文化與語言的交織中持續動態形成的過程。研究發現跨文化母親主體需面對來自外部文化的多重母職腳本，同時主動且策略性地挪用與抗拒，她們必須重構家庭資源的支持網絡，透過外包專業、家庭互助、社區支持與孩子自主學習，持續更新家庭資源；此外，母親們在多元文化情境中主動解構語言與文化背後的權力運作，以更清楚地指引自我實踐歷程。
而在本研究背景下獨特的「離散倫理關懷」則觀察到，跨文化母親如何在多重倫理困境與權力結構的張力中，透過持續協商的過程，進行主體倫理實踐。這種關懷並非僅是單純母愛的自然展現，而是透過深層的倫理部署與反思，調整家庭內部的關係與期待，持續更新自我的倫理分寸。本研究所指的「離散」概念，不只是研究背景群體的地理分散，亦兼指後結構主義與文化研究領域，文化與社群經驗的分散性、碎片化及流動性，並非數學上的可數性。這種離散的倫理關懷展現於跨文化母親不斷在家庭、社區、語言、法律與文化的多重座標之間，探索並實踐著母職關懷的可能性與邊界。
本研究透過敘事研究的深度詮釋，提出跨文化母職是一個持續協商、翻譯與再生產的主體過程。敘事研究的結論並未提供單一真理或定論，而邀請讀者重新理解母職經驗與主體性如何在日常話語與文化規訓中持續重構。研究成果提供跨文化母職經驗深層理解的啟發，並促使讀者重新省思自我主體與文化結構之間複雜的動態關係。
This study explores the self-governance of mothering subjectivities, aiming to understand the practices, challenges, and dilemmas encountered by mothers who experience geographical mobility and cultural boundaries. It also analyzes the dynamic relationship between maternal thinking and the ethics of care among mothers undergoing maternal translations and transitions. Here, maternal or mothering refers to the condition of being a mother. Adopting a longitudinal narrative approach, this research foregrounds maternal subjectivities, employing subjective experience, contextual analysis, and reflexivity as its foundational elements. It offers a deep interpretation of mothering as an ongoing practice, focusing particularly on how mothers dynamically construct their subjectivities through their continuous negotiation and positioning.
In this context, "cultural boundaries" not only denote a phenomenon but also highlight how mothers interact and adapt between two distinct cultures. "Maternal translations," drawing from poststructuralist and humanities-social science traditions, transcend literal linguistic translations to incorporate processes of meaning-making and cultural interpretation. Similarly, "maternal transition" extends beyond mere shifts in status, emphasizing how mothers actively renegotiate and adapt their mothering roles, create new support networks, and shape unique practices within multicultural contexts.
Self-governing mothering subjectivities refer to mothers' active management and self-monitoring of their emotions, behaviors, and moral responsibilities, resulting from the internalization of disciplinary discourses within particular socio-cultural contexts. Rooted in Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality, this study emphasizes that mothers are not merely passive subjects constrained by external institutional demands but actively discipline themselves to align with idealized images of motherhood. Such self-governance becomes particularly complex for mothers navigating cross-cultural contexts. Facing divergent linguistic and parenting expectations from different cultural backgrounds, these mothers continually negotiate and translate their subjectivities within cultural norms and individual practices. Educational strategies such as outsourcing professional help, self-teaching, family co-learning, or encouraging children's autonomous learning are not merely educational decisions; rather, they represent arenas where mothering ethics and gendered responsibilities are redefined.
Employing narrative methods combined with a feminist-integrative theoretical framework, this research introduces two central concepts: the "fluid genealogy of maternal translation pathways" and "diasporic ethics of care." The notion of genealogy, inspired by Foucault’s approach, highlights the nonlinear, pluralistic, and dynamic formation of subjective experiences. This study employs a three-step analytical approach—constructing images, deconstructing discourses, and reconstructing subjectivities—to delineate the generation process of mothering subjectivities. Through the "fluid genealogy of maternal translation pathways," it demonstrates that mothering subjectivities are not fixed entities but continuously emerge dynamically at the intersection of cultural and linguistic contexts. Findings reveal that cross-cultural mothers actively and strategically engage with multiple maternal scripts from different cultural sources. They reconstruct their family resource support networks through professional outsourcing, mutual family support, community resources, and children’s autonomous learning, continually renewing their family resources. Additionally, mothers proactively deconstruct the power dynamics behind linguistic and cultural practices to navigate their pathways more clearly.
Moreover, this study uniquely conceptualizes the "diasporic ethics of care," capturing how cross-cultural mothers enact ethical subjectivity amidst multiple ethical dilemmas and tensions of power structures through ongoing negotiations. Such care surpasses natural maternal affection, involving deeper ethical deliberations and reflections to realign internal family relationships and expectations, continually recalibrating personal ethical boundaries. The "diasporic" concept within this study denotes not only geographic dispersion but also encompasses fragmentation, dispersal, and fluidity of cultural and communal experiences informed by poststructuralism and cultural studies, distinctly separate from its quantitative mathematical meaning. This diasporic ethics of care is demonstrated through cross-cultural mothers’ continuous explorations and enactments of caregiving possibilities and boundaries within multiple coordinates of family, community, language, law, and culture.
Through in-depth narrative interpretations, this study posits cross-cultural mothering as an ongoing subjectivity process of continuous negotiation, translation, and re-production. Rather than presenting a singular truth or conclusion, narrative research invites readers to revisit and reconceptualize how mothering experiences and subjectivities are continually reconstructed through daily discursive and cultural disciplinary practices. Ultimately, this research deepens scholarly understanding of cross-cultural mothering experiences, prompting readers to critically reflect upon the complex, dynamic relationships between personal subjectivities and cultural structures. |
| 參考文獻: | 壹、中文文獻
Barth, F. (Ed.).（2014）。族群與邊界：文化差異下的社會組織〔李麗琴譯〕。商務印書館。（原著出版年：1969）
Beauvoir, S. de.（2013）。第二性〔邱瑞鑾譯〕。貓頭鷹（原著出版年：1949）
Chodorow, N. J.（2003）。母職的再生產：心理分析與性別社會學〔張君玫譯〕。群學。（原著出版年：1978）
Douglas, M.（2008）。潔淨與危險〔 黃劍波、盧忱、柳博（斌貝）譯〕。民族。（原著出版年：1966）
Foucault, M.（2018）。生命政治的誕生〔 莫偉民、趙偉譯〕。上海人民。（原著出版年：2008）
Foucault, M.（2020）。監視與懲罰：監獄的誕生〔 王紹中譯〕。時報。（原著出版年：1975）
Foucault, M.（2023）。知識考古學〔李沅洳譯〕。時報。（原著出版年：1969）
Heywood, C.（2003）。孩子的歷史：從中世紀到現代的兒童與童年〔 黃煜文譯〕。麥田。（原著出版年：2002）
Hochschild, A. R.（2017）。第二輪班：那些性別革命尚未完成的事〔張正霖譯〕。群學。（原著出版年：1989）
Lareau, A.（2021）。不平等的童年：拚教養能翻轉階級嗎？〔林佑柔譯〕。野人。（原著出版年：2011）
Magezis, J.（2000）。女性研究自學讀本〔何穎怡譯〕。女書。（原著出版年：1996）
Miller, C.（2023）。晶片戰爭：矽時代的新賽局，解析地緣政治下全球最關鍵科技的創新、商業模式與臺灣的未來〔洪慧芳譯〕。天下。（原著出版年：2022）
Rousseau, J.-J.（2012）。愛彌兒（上）（下）〔李平漚譯〕。五南。（原著出版年：1762）
方志華（2004）。關懷倫理學與教育。洪葉文化。
王玟雅（2023）。臺灣非婚生育女性的母職實踐經驗〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立清華大學教育心理與諮商學系。
王淑英、孫嫚薇（2003）。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊，2（4），147-174。
李有成（2013）。離散。允晨文化。
李昭慧（2002）。生命之河－一個中年女性安全感與母職的破解〔未出版之碩士論文〕。輔仁大學心理學系。
李柏翰、張竹芩（2023）。被偷走的人工流產自由：「多布斯訴傑克森女性健康組織案」之國際人權法律評析。醫藥、科技與法律，28(10)，93-146。
李淑娟（2009）。莎拉‧魯迪克「母職思考」及其教育蘊義〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北市立教育大學教育學系。
亞里斯多德（Aristotle）著，羅念生譯。（2005）。尼各馬科倫理學。商務印書館。（原著約成於西元前350年）
卓曉青（2014）。由關懷倫理學論母職之意義與內涵〔未出版之碩士論文〕。輔仁大學哲學系。
林玉英（2010）。「缺角的甜蜜家庭」－成年未婚單親媽媽母職經驗之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立屏東科技大學社會工作系。
姜淑惠（2013）。東南亞新移民離婚女性的婚姻歷程和母職實踐〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立暨南國際大學東南亞研究所。
洪世謙（2015）。疆界民主化──解構哲學式的思考。臺灣政治學刊，19（1），65-96。
馬慧君、張世雄（2006）。變遷社會中的女性－一個生命歷程的研究觀點。國際文化研究，2（2），59-97。
陳郁雯（2008）。從Derrida《法律的力量》一文探討法與正義的關係。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所。
陳惠娟; 郭丁熒（1998）。「母職」概念的內涵之探討－女性主義觀點。教育研究集刊，41，73-101。
陸怡青（2014）。越南新移民女性的成長經驗與母職實踐－正向心理學觀點〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
勞動部統計處（2010年5月）。中華民國職業標準分類（第6次修訂）。2025年5月20日。https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy12/1236menu.htm
曾婷翊（2023）。曾遭受兒少性剝削女性母職實踐之經驗探究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所。
黃怡瑾（2011）。婚暴中的權力控制－個人自覺與社會結構的互動歷程。婦女與兩性學刊，12，95-137。
楊大春（1995）。德希達。生智。
葉致芬（2021）。女性主義方法論的實踐與反思。輔導季刊，57（1）, 25-38。
詹志禹（2002）。認識與知識：建構論vs 接受論。載於詹志禹（主編），建構論 : 理論基礎與教育應用（12-27頁）。正中。
潘淑滿（2005）。臺灣母職圖像。女學學誌，20，41-91。
潘淑滿（2022）。質性研究理論與應用（二版），心理。
鄭忍嬌（2013）。一個勞動階級都市原住民女性的母職生活經驗。人類發展與家庭學報，15，83-105。
鄭忍嬌（2013）。在子女成年背影中，回首職業婦女的母職來時路－中年職業婦女母職生活經驗之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系。
鄭清霞（2007）。育兒責任分擔的探討與推估－國家vs.家庭。東吳社會工作學報，17，95-135。
蕭瑞麟（2020）。不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辯脈絡（五版），五南。
藍佩嘉（1991）。顛覆母職，母職－消滅女人的制度，當代，12，84-100。
藍佩嘉（2019）。拼教養：全球化、親職焦慮與不平等童年。春山，2019。
貳、外文文獻
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press.
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Little, Brown and Company.
Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective on aging: Theory, research, and reflections. Springer.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
Berger, R. J., & Lorenz, L. S. (Eds.). (2016). Disability and qualitative inquiry: Methods for rethinking an ableist world (pp. 1-15). Taylor & Francis.
Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Boudah, D. J. (2019). Conducting educational research: A guide to completing a thesis, dissertation, or paper in education (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. Routledge.
Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 651–679). Sage.
Chodorow, N. J. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302–338. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1994.9.3.02a00040
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cooper, M. (2014). Cut Adrift: Families in insecure times. University of California Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (5th ed.). Open University Press.
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3-19). Springer.
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.
Folbre, N. (2001). The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. The New Press.
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(8), 717-732.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, capitalism, and the cunning of history. New Left Review, 56, 97-117. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00725055v1/document
Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Verso.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). Sage.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
Gillies, V. (2007). Marginalised mothers: Exploring working class experiences of parenting. Routledge.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275714106_In_A_Different_Voice_Psychological_Theory_and_Women's_Development
Glesne, C. (2015). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Pearson.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
Guerrina, R. (2001). Motherhood and politics: Gender, equality and the state. Routledge.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the “Other.” In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 223–290). London: Sage.
Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Harding, S. (1987). The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
Hinojosa Hernández, L., & Munz, S. M. (2024). Reproductive justice and critical communication pedagogy: An analysis of the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Communication Education, 73(1), 84-95. https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fdx.doi.org%2f10.1080%2f03634523.2023.2295968
Hutchison, E. D. (2005). Dimensions of human behavior: The changing life course (3rd ed.). Sage.
Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one. Cornell University Press.
Jablonski, N. G. (2005). Balancing cultural traditions and new practices: The case of immigrant mothers. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 35(1), 67-84.
Jackson, D., & Morrow, R. A. (2021). Critical perspectives on educational leadership: An introduction to the field. Routledge.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. Yale University Press.
Louie, A. (2004). Chineseness across borders: Renegotiating Chinese identities in China and the United States. Duke University Press.
Lutz, C. A. (1986). The ethics of caring and the notion of the "good mother": Toward a cultural theory of motherhood. American Anthropologist, 88(3), 569-577.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Australia.
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Nicolson, P. (1993). Motherhood and feminism: A radical reassessment of the maternal role. Routledge.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2002). Starting at home: Caring and social policy. University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2008). Critical lessons: What our schools should teach. Cambridge University Press.
Oakley, A. (1974). The sociology of housework. Blackwell.
OECD. (2011). Cooking and caring, building and repairing: Unpaid work around the world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264186030-en
Olson, D. H., & DeFrain, J. (2000). Marriage and the family: Diversity and strengths (3rd ed.). Mayfield Publishing Company.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
Phoenix, A., Woollett, A., & Lloyd, E. (1999). Motherhood: Meanings, Practices, and Ideologies. Sage.
Plaza, M. (1982). The mother/the same: Hatred of the mother in psychoanalysis. Feminist Issues, 2, 75–100. http://pds23.egloos.com/pds/201212/08/71/The_Mother_the_Same_Hatred_of_the_mother_in_psychoanalysis_(Monique_Plaza).pdf
Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
Rich, A. (1986). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Norton.
Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). Sage.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
Risman, B. J. (2018). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. Yale University Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). Free Association Books.
Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Beacon Press.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Sage.
Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). Sage.
Seidman, I. E. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Silverman, D. (2017). Qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
Simpson, R. (2004). Motherhood in migration: The experiences of immigrant women in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 25(2), 123-145.
Smart, C. (1996). Motherhood and the family: A feminist analysis. Routledge.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press.
Smith, J. (2004). Critiques of Mary Douglas's boundary theory: A gendered perspective. Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 45-67. https://doi.org/xxxx
Sommer, D. (2003). Emotional language and cultural narratives. Cambridge University Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Stearns, P. N. (2003). Anxious parents: A history of modern childrearing in America. NYU Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Umansky, L. (1996). Mothers and daughters: Feminist theory and the politics of mothering. Temple University Press.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2005). Guide to producing statistics on time use: Measuring paid and unpaid work. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesf/seriesf_93e.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Waring, M. (1988). If women counted: A new feminist economics. Harper & Row.
Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1905)
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. Oxford University Press.
Zakaria, F. (2024, March 10). Opinion: The world’s most dangerous place has only gotten more dangerous. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/10/opinions/taiwan-china-us-tensions-war-zakaria/index.html
Zelizer, V. A. (1994). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. Princeton University Press. |
| 描述: | 碩士
國立政治大學
幼兒教育研究所
108157001 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108157001 |
| 資料類型: | thesis |
| 顯示於類別: | [幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 37 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
