Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31806
|
| Title: | 讀者回應法在高中英詩教學效益之研究
The Effects of Reader Response Approach on English Poetry Teaching in Senior High School |
| Authors: | 金慶芳
Chin, Ching-fang |
| Contributors: | 林啟一
Lin, Chi-yee
金慶芳
Chin, Ching-fang |
| Keywords: | 讀者回應法
英詩
教學
reader response approach
English poem
teaching |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-14 12:16:33 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討讀者回應法在高中英詩教學上的效益。在探討中著重在比較兩種教學模式──讀者回應模式與傳統教學模式──的成效，更各別以實驗組與控制組進行研究。其重點針對以下五項：(1)學生的英文學習動機(2)學生對英詩的興趣(3)學生的寫作能力(4)學生的語言能力(5)同儕的互動和師生間的互動。
依據Dias和Hayhoe（1988）的論點，自1930年代起，新文評（New Criticism）、結構主義（Structuralism）和後結構主義（Post-structuralism）即影響著英詩教學，然而這股文評思潮，隨著讀者反應理論的興起，逐漸式微。起而代之的是強調以讀者為中心，重視讀者與文本間的互動，並允許讀者對同一文學作品有不同詮釋的教學模式，此教學模式已成為文學教師樂於採用的教學法。
本研究採用Rosenblatt（1978）為首的理論與建議，輔以各種活動，導引高中生解讀英詩，以實證讀者回應教學模式的具體成效，暨測試傳統的教學模式。
此研究以台北市立大同高中兩班七十七位高一學生為研究對象。兩班學生分成實驗組和控制組，教授同樣英詩，在為期四個月的教學活動中，實驗組接受讀者回應的教學模式，並參與討論，回應研究者所設計的題目和活動。控制組則採用傳統的教學模式，教授文本內容、結構為主。兩組皆以學生的問卷調查、GEPT成績、學習單和研究者的訪談、觀察做為本研究分析的基礎。
經由資料分析，茲將本研究發現之摘要條列如下：
1.整體而言，讀者回應教學模式比傳統教學模式更具效果。
2.實驗組學生對英文學習動機高於控制組學生。
3.實驗組學生比控制組學生對英詩更具濃厚興趣。
4.實驗組學生的寫作能力優於控制組學生。
5.實驗組學生的整體語言能力高於控制組學生。
6.依據問卷與研究者觀察，實驗組同儕間的互動與師生間的互動皆較控制組更具活力。
本研究結論發現，讀者回應法對學生的英文學習動機、英詩的興趣、一般寫作、語言的能力和同儕、師生的互動皆有良好的成效。
Though New Criticism, Structuralism and Post-structuralism have dominated literature teaching since 1930s, reader response approach with its emphasis on the interaction between the text and the reader, has come into prominence and made a great impact on teaching literature over the last two decades. This research aimed to investigate the effects of reader response approach on English poetry teaching at a senior high school in terms of the students’ motivation in English, interest in poetry, writing ability, language proficiency, interaction, and teaching modes.
A total of seventy-seven 10th graders at Taipei Municipal Ta-tung Senior High participated in the study. They were divided into two groups: the experimental group (37 students) instructed in the reader response approach with diverse activities, and the control group (40 students) taught in the traditional way of teaching. The experiment was done once a week, within the four class periods in the whole semester from September 8, 2003 to January 9, 2004 with a total of sixteen weeks. Instruments such as the GEPT, a questionnaire, interviews, observations, students’ worksheets and students’ poems were employed to evaluate the effects based on the quantitative basis.
The results of this study were summarized as follows:
1.Overall, the response-based teaching gained much more popularity than the tradition way, which might suggest that the response-based teaching is more effective than the traditional one.
2.The experimental group showed higher motivation in learning English than the control one.
3.The experimental students displayed a deeper interest in poetry than the control students.
4.Students’ writing ability of the experimental group was superior to that of the control group, as evidenced by the t-test.
5.The language proficiency of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group.
6.According to the questionnaires, interviews and observations, the interaction in the experimental group was more dynamic than that in the control group.
In conclusion, this study proposes some pedagogical implications for senior high school teachers in teaching English poetry, suggesting that the reader response approach achieved better effects in this aspect. |
| Reference: | Albright, D. (Ed.). (1992). W. B. Yeats the poems. London: Everyman’s Library.
Ali, S. (1994). The reader-response approach: An alternative for teaching literature in a second language. Journal of Reading, 37 (4), 288-296.
Aloin, D. (1965). Poems and poets. St. Louis: Mcgraw-Hill.
Arp, T. R. (1997). Perrine’s sound and sense. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Bartlett, J. (1992). Familiar quotations: A collection of passages, phrases, and proverbs traced to their sources in ancient and modern literature. Toronto, Canada: Little Brown and Company.
Bengi, I., & Kurtboke, P. (1985). Poetry—The best words in their best order. Forum, 23 (2), 21-23.
Bleich, D. (1978). Subjective criticism. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
Bloom, B. S. (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In A. W. Lorin & S. A. Lauren (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Brumfit, C. J., & Carter, R. A. (1986). Literature and education. In C. J. Brumfit & R. A. Carter (Eds.), Literature and language teaching (pp. 22-34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckley, E. M. (1987). Teaching a literature-centered English program. English Teaching and Learning, 11 (3), 44-68.
Carlisle, A. (2000). Reading logs: An application of reader-response theory in ELT. ELT Journal, 54 (1), 12-19.
Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. New York: Longman.
Carter, R., & McRae, J. (1996). Language, literature and the learner. New York: Longman.
Chen, Y. H. (2002). A pedagogical study of “textual performance” as a means of teaching English poetry. English Teaching and Learning, 27 (2), 51-66.
Chu, P. M. (1991). Concepts, methods and teaching on English poetry. The Proceedings: Conference on English Literature and Language Teaching Republic of China (pp. 169-184). Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.: Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University.
Chuang, K. L. (1998). From “Fog” to “The Dust of Snow” : On teaching poetry. English Teaching and Learning, 22 (3), 13-28.
Clare, M. T. (1960). A book of poetry. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Clark, J. R. (1985). Writing in the shortest forms. Exercise Exchange, 31 (1), 36-37.
Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cousins, L. (1996). Humpty dumpty and other nursery rhymes. New York: Dutton Children’s Books.
Culler, J. (1983). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after Structuralism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Denton, K. M. (1998). A child’s treasury of nursery rhymes. London: Kingfisher.
Dias, P., & Hayhoe, M. (1988). Developing response to poetry. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Duke, C. R., & Jacobsen, S. A. (1983). Reading and writing poetry: Successful approaches for the student and teacher. Phoenix: The Oryx Press.
Elliot, R. (1990). Encouraging reader-response to literature in ESL situations. ELT Journal, 44 (3), 191-198.
Feinberg, R. M. (1983). Poetry theater: Integrating drama and poetry. In C. R. Duke & S. A. Jacobsen (Eds.), Reading and writing poetry: Successful approaches for the student and teacher (pp. 165-172). Phoenix: The Oryx Press.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1988). Research and practice: A reader response approach to the teaching of literature. Reading Research and Instruction, 27 (4), 61-66.
Frye, N. (1963). The well-tempered critic. Bloomington: Indian University Press.
Gajdusek, L. (1988). Toward wider use of literature in ESL: Why and how. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (2), 227-257.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6 (1), 126-135.
Graham, C. (1978). Jazz chants. New York: Oxford University Press.
Graham, C. (1979). Jazz chants for children. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gram, J. (1969). A poem is a personal thing. Forum, 7 (2), 63-72.
Greenberg, H. (1983). Writing with family album photos. Teachers and Writers Magazine, 14 (5), 1-4.
Harris, S. (1982). A reader-response approach to the teaching of literature. In K. Davis (Ed.), The responding reader: Nine approaches to teaching literature (pp. 19-29). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266 460).
Harrison, D. L., & Cullinan, B. E. (1999). Easy poetry lessons that dazzle and delight. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
Holbrook, H. T. (1987). Reader response in the classroom. Journal of Reading, 30 (6), 556-559.
Holland, N. (1973). Poems in persons: An introduction to the psychoanalysis of literature. New York: W. W. Norton.
Holland, N. (1985). Reading readers reading. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure (pp. 3-21). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Hollander, J. (1981). Rhyme’s reason. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Huang, C. L. (1996). New perspectives on English language teaching. Taipei: The Crane Publishing, Co., Ltd.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Jacobs, L. (1977). Three approaches to the teaching of poetry writing. English Education, 8 (3), 161-166.
Jerome, J. (1980). The poet’s handbook. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest Books.
Kagan, S. (1987). Cooperative learning resources for teachers. Reverside, CA: University of California.
Kavanaugh, P. J., & Michie, J. (Eds.). (1985). The Oxford book of short poems. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, X. J. (1987). Literature: An introduction to fiction, poetry, and drama. Boston & Toronto: Little Brown and Company.
Kenney, D. J., & Wilson, L. (1982). Card bards: Poetry in the card catalog. English Journal, 71 (8), 63-65.
Knight, M. (Ed.). (1985). Keep in touch: Modern literary texts for discussion and language practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Ltd.
Kuo, C. H. (1997). Teaching literature to science students. Selected Papers from the Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 350-357). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Lathem, E. C. (Ed.). (1969). The poetry of Robert Frost. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lazard, G. (2000). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C.T., & Wang, S. P. (1999). Integrating language-based and learner-centered approaches into poetry teaching. The Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 203-212). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Lee, W. R. (Ed.). (1967). ESL selections. London: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. N. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. New York: Longman.
Lin, H. C., & Sher, H. J. (2000). Reader’s response approach to English poetry teaching. Selected Papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 411-420). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Lin, H. C. (2002). Effectiveness of online poetry learning for EFL learners. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/ Fourth Pan-Asian Conference (pp. 440-448). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Lin, M. S. (2002). A questionnaire about senior high school students’ literary interests [www document]. Retrieved: http://www.hseneglish.com.tw
Lin, S. E. (1991). Focus on Readers: Innovation from Reader Response Criticism. Selected Papers from the Proceedings: Conference on English Literature and Language Teaching (pp. 89-102). Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.: Dept. of English, National Taiwan Normal University.
Littlewood, W. T. (1986). Literature in the school foreign language course. In C. J. Brumfit & R. A. Carter (Eds.), Literature and language teaching (pp. 177-183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu, Y. L. (1988). What will the world be: English teaching in junior college. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University, Taiwan.
Long, S. (1999). Mother goose. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.
Lukasevich, A. (1984). Making poetry a natural experience for young children. Childhood Education, 61 (1), 36-42.
Maley, A. (1987). Poetry and song as effective language-learning activities. In W. Rivers (Ed.), Interactive language teaching (pp. 93-109). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maley A., & Duff A. (1989). The inward ear: Poetry in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marckwardt, A. H. (1978). The place of literature in teaching of English as a second or foreign language. East-West Center: The University Press of Haiwaii.
Mawell, R. J., & Meiser, M. J. (1993). Teaching English in middle and secondary schools. New York: Macmillan.
Mayhead, R. (1965). Understanding literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McAlpine, G., & Warren, J. (1977). Reader-response approaches to teaching literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 666)
McKay, S. (1986). Literature in the ESL classroom. In C. J. Brumfit & R. A. Carter (Eds.), Literature and language teaching (pp. 191-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moen, C. B. (2002). Literature response activities and rubrics. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Myers, J. A., Jr. (1965). The teaching of poetry. In D. L. Burton (Ed.), Literature study in the high school (pp. 209-210). New York: Holy, Rineheart & Winston.
Naparstek, A. (2003). Honku: The Zen Antidote to Road Rage (1st ed.). New York: Villard.
Napierkowski, M. R., & Ruby, M. K. (Eds.). (1998). Poetry for students (Vol. 1). Detroit, MI: Gale Research.
Newcome, Z. (2003). Five little monkeys. London: Walker Books Ltd.
O’Brien, V. (1985). Teaching poetry in the secondary school. London: Edward Arnold.
Perrine, L. (1971). Sound and sense: An introduction to poetry. Taipei: Ta-tung Publish, Co., Ltd.
Povey. J. F. (1984). Literature for discussion: A reader for advanced students of English as a second language. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Ratliff, L. J. (1987). Poetry doesn’t have to hurt: A self-discovery composition—poetry teaching method. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6 (2), 271-277.
Reeves, J. (1958). Teaching poetry. London: Heineman Educational Books Ltd.
Reinsmith, W. A. (1994). Archetypal forms in teaching. College Teaching, Fall, 42 (4), 131-137.
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1998). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Hong Kong: Addson Wesley Longman China Limited.
Roberts, E. V. (1999). Writing about literature (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1968). Literature as exploration (Rev. ed.). London: Heinemann Education Books Ltd.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literature work. Southern Illinois University Press.
Sage, H. (1987). Incorporting literature in ESL instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Silberstein, S. (1994). Techniques and resources in teaching reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
Steinbergh, J. W. (1994). Reading and writing poetry: A Guide for teachers. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Sung, C. Y. (1991). A study of literary teaching materials and teaching methods in senior high school. English Teaching and Learning, 16 (3), 29-42.
Sweeney, J. (1994). Quick poetry activities. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Vaughan-Rees, M. (1994). Rhymes and rhythm: A poem-based course for English pronunciation. London: Macmillian.
Wang, C. O. (2001). The effect of instructing writing formula poems in junior high schools. Selected Papers from the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 621-634). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1964). Theory of literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yang, T. H. (1991). Good but not expected: A question for literary works as reading materials for college freshmen. Selected Papers from the Seventh Conference on English Teaching in the Republic of China (pp. 11-25). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
90951010
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951010 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 451 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
