Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32871
|
| Title: | 幼稚園組織創新與跨組織關係之研究 |
| Authors: | 陳靜怡 |
| Contributors: | 徐聯恩
陳靜怡 |
| Keywords: | 幼稚園
組織創新
跨組織關係
教學創新
行政創新
體制連結
資源連結
kindergartens
organizational innovation
interorganizational links
institutional links
resource links |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 14:45:08 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究的目的有二，一是探討幼稚園組織創新，將從組織創新重要性、組織創新新穎性和組織創新等三方面，以釐清幼稚園組織創新的樣貌。二是探討幼稚園跨組織關係對組織創新的影響，其中跨組織關係又分為體制連結與資源連結。體制連結係指，園長是否為該協會成員，以及一年內參與政府和專業團體所舉辦的研習活動時數，和園所校外教學觀摩的次數；資源連結係指幼稚園在一年內與社區辦理活動次數或交流的頻率。
本研究經由分層隨機抽樣，在台北、台中與高雄縣市共寄發315份問卷，請各所的園長填寫。其中，回收的有效問卷為95份，回收率則為30.48%。且以t考驗、變異數分析、Pearson積差相關和層級回歸分析進行考驗。
本研究獲致之研究結果如下
一、本研究共列舉118項創新措施，其中教學創新為62項，行政創新
為58項。
二、不同組織規模的園長對教學創新重要性的評價也不相同，藉由
Scheff’s的多重比較後，發現小型幼稚園園長對教學創新重要
性的評價顯著高於中型幼稚園園長。
三、不同組織規模的園長對教學創新和行政創新的新穎性評價亦不
同，經Scheff’s多重比較後，發現小型幼稚園園長對教學創新
新穎性的評價遠高於中型幼稚園園長。
四、在教學創新上，私立幼稚園採用的創新措施顯著多於公立幼稚
園。
五、在行政創新上，私立幼稚園採用的創新措施顯著多於公立幼稚
園。
六、在教學創新上，城市地區的幼稚園採用的創新措施顯著多於鄉村
地區的幼稚園。
七、在行政創新上，城市地區的幼稚園採用的創新措施顯著多於鄉村
地區的幼稚園。
八、幼稚園園長對組織創新重要性的評價與教學創新有顯著的相關
性。
九、幼稚園園長對組織創新重要性的評價與行政創新有顯著的相關
性。
十、幼稚園的資源連結愈高，則教學創新愈多。
十一、幼稚園的資源連結愈高，則行政創新愈多。
關鍵字：幼稚園、組織創新、跨組織關係、教學創新、行政創新、體制連結、 資源連結
The purpose of this article is to integrative organizational innovation and the relationship between organizational innovation and Interorganizational links in Kindergarten. A stratified random sampling and a questionnaires survey are adopted for the study and were distributed to 315 kindergartens in Taipei County, Taipei City, Taichung County, Taichung City, Kaohsiung County and Kaohsiung City. The number of valid returns was 95, and the valid return rate was 30.48%. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and hierarchical regression analysis.
The results were as follow:
1.In the study, we particularized 118 innovations: instruction innovation are 62 items, and the administrative innovation are 58 items.
2.The difference in scale of kindergarten results in the difference in the importance of instruction innovation.
3.The difference in scale of kindergarten results in the difference in the degree of instruction innovation and administration innovation.
4.The difference in type of organization results in the difference in the instruction innovation.
5.The difference in type of organization results in the difference in the administration innovation.
6.The difference in area of organization results in the difference in the instruction innovation.
7.The difference in area of organization results in the difference in the administration innovation.
8.Our results showed a positive relationship between the importance of instruction innovation and the instruction innovation in Taiwan kindergartens.
9.Our results showed a positive relationship between the importance of administration innovation and the administration innovation in Taiwan kindergartens.
10.Kindergartens are more likely to adopt instruction innovations when they are linked with in resource links.
11.Kindergartens are more likely to adopt administration innovations when they are linked with in resource links.
Key words: kindergartens、organizational innovation、interorganizational links、institutional links、resource links |
| Reference: | 中文參考書目
毛連塭、吳清山、林佩蓉、幸曼玲、劉春榮（民83）。當前幼稚園教育問題及意見之調查研究。台北市：國立教育資料館。
王保進（民88）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北：心理出版社。
王柏年（民87）。高科技產業革新性人力資源管理制度與組織創新之關係研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
王靜珠（民81）。幼稚園行政。台北：五南出版社。
吳至慧（民89）。企業特性、人力資本、產業環境與組織創新相關性研究。國立中山人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
李明中（民86）。台北市幼稚園園長對幼稚園評鑑觀點之研究。私立文化大學兒童福利學系碩士論文。
汪昭芬（民89）。組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關連性研究：科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實證。國立成功大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
幸曼玲、林佩蓉、歐姿秀、蔡延治（民84）。重要的一小步－－如何幫孩子選擇幼稚園。臺北市教育局。
林義屏（民90）。市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究-科學園區資訊電子產業為例。國立中山企管研究所博士論文。
邵泓嘉（民89）。市場知識管理與創新對組織績效影響之研究—以連鎖零售業為例。高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
徐聯恩（民91）。組織特徵與組織創新--以幼教產業為例（I）。國科會專題研究報告。
徐聯恩、李欣蒨（民91），近十年台灣地區幼稚園生量演變及其可能原因探討，兒童與家庭學術研討會論文集。台北：輔仁大學。
徐聯恩、簡楚瑛（民91）。幼稚園園務經營與成本分析之研究。台北市，教育部。
翁麗芳、熊秉真（民89）。台北市幼稚園與托兒所現況評議研究。台北市：台北市教育局。
高強華（民86）。創造學校與社區互動的新境界。台灣教育，558，2－9。
張幸愉（民83）。國民小學運用社區資源之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張湘君、張鑑如（民90）。幼稚園實施外國語文課程及聘僱外國籍教師從事外國語文教學之可行性研究。台北市：教育部。
莊立民（民91）。組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
許明珠（民91）。費德勒權變領導理論在幼稚園園長領導之應用。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
連麗文（民88）。消費金融產品創新知識管理之研究。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
陳伯璋、王筱篁、高傳正、張孝筠、石明英（民84）。我國幼稚園行政組織編制之研究。台北市：教育部。
彭朱如（民87）。醫療產業中跨組織合作關係類型與管理機制之研究。國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
曾智顯（民90）。企業知識管理與組織創新。國立中山人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
黃千里（民90）。市場導向、創新與績效關係之研究—以台灣7-Eleven為例。高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
楊國賜、蔡榮貴、蔡春美、盧美貴、江麗莉、周淑惠、張孝筠、郭碧金、楊淑朱、吳光名、鄭瑞菁、高傳正（民91）。全國幼兒教育普查計畫。台北市：教育部。
蔡啟通（民86）。組織創新、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
鄭夙惠（民89）。台灣私立醫院組織互動之實證研究。國立成功大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
賴姿蓉（民87）。組織創新對人力資源管理角色影響之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
薛婷芳、廖鳳瑞（民88）。從幼稚園參與評鑑之經驗看幼稚園在教保轉變之歷程—個案研究。國立台北師範學院學報，13，571-602
謝甄晏（民90）。市場導向、市場知識管理、產品創新與績效之實證研究—以台灣高科技產業為例。雲林科技大學企業管理所碩士班。
簡楚瑛、林麗卿（民86）。影響幼稚園課程轉型之組織因素的探討--一個個案研究。載於中華民國課程與教學學會主編，邁向未來的課程與教學，127-158。台北：師大書苑。
Drucker, P. F. （1985）。創新與創業精神（譯者蕭富峰、李田樹民74)。台北：麥田出版社。（原出版年:1985）
Robbins, S. P（1996）。組織行為（譯者李茂興、李慕華、林宗鴻）。台北市，揚智。（原出版年：1994）
Sallis, E. （2001)。全面品質教育（譯者何瑞薇）。台北市，元照。（原出版年：1993）。
英文參考書目
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and creativity and innovation in organization. In B.M. Staw. &L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. 10, 123-167.
Baume Crole (1999). Governmental Steering and Curriculum Innovations: A comparative study of the relation between governmental steering instruments and innovations et al. Studies in Higher Education. 24, 2, 266-267.
Burgess, G. H. (1989).Industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall.
Cheng, Yu-Ting, Van de Ven, A. H. (1996). Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos?. Organization Science. 7, 6, 593-614.
Contractor, F. J., & P. Lorange (1988). Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basic for cooperative venture. In Contractor, F. J. & P. Lorange (Ed), Cooperative strategic in international business. Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company
Cumming, T. G. (1984). Transorganizational development. In B.Staw & L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior. 6, 367-422.
D’Aunno Thomas, Vaughn Thomas E. andMcElroy Peter (1999). An institutional analysis of HIV prevention efforts by the nation’s outpatient drug abuse treatment units, Journal of health and social behavior. 40, 2, 175-192.
Daft, R.L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal. 21, 2, 193-210.
Daft, R.L. (1982). Bureaucratic versus nonbureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations. S.B. Bacharach(Ed), 129-1666. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization Theory and Design. 7e.
Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management. 13, 675-688.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovations: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journa. 34(3), 555-590.
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies, 13, 375-402.
Damanpour, F. (1996).Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models.Management Services. 42, 693-716.
Damanpour, F. and Evan, W.M. (1984).Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly. 29, 392-409.
Dougherty, D. and Bowman (1995).The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation. California Management Review. 37, 4, 28-44.
English, F.W. and Hill, J. C. (1994). Total Quality Education：Transforming Schools into Learning Places. Thousand Oaks, Calif.：Corwin Press.
Frankel, Ernst G. (1990).Management of technological change: the great challenge of management to the future. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Friedman Leonard H, Gose James B andOrr Roy（2000）. The timing of medical technology acquisition：Strategic decision making in turbulent environment / Practitioner application. Journal of Healthcare Management. 45, 5, 317-331.
Geijsel Femke, Sleegers Peter, Van den, R. B. and Kelchtermans (2001).
Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs
in schools: Teachers` perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly. 37 (1), 130-166.
Gose, J.B. and Park, Seung Ho(1997). Interorganizational links and innovation：The case of hospital services, Academy of management Journal. 3, 40, 673-696.
Hage, J. T.（1999）.Organizational innovation and organizational change. Socio., 25, 597-622
Hall, R. H. (1987). Organization: Structures, Press, and Outcomes. 4th, Prention Hall, New Jersey.
Han, J. K., Kim N. and Srivastava R. K.（1998）. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing. 62, 30-45.
Hannan Andrew, English Susan & Silver Harold (1999). Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project on “innovations in teaching and learning in high education”. Studies in Higher Education. 24, 3, 279-289.
Helburn, S.W. and C. Howes (1996).Child Care Cost and Quality. The Future of Children. 6, 2, 62-82.
Holt. K. (1983). Product innovation management: A workbook for management in industry. 2nd ed., Boston: Butterworths.
Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal. 11, 497-499.
Kanter, R.M. (1988). When thousand flowers bloom:Structural,collective,and social conditions for innovation in organization.Research in Organizational Behavior. 10, 169-211.
Kimberli., J.R., & Evanisko, M. (1981). Organiztional innovation:The influence of Individual,organitational,and contextual factors on hospital adoptional of technological and administrativ innovation.Academy of Management Journal. 24, 689-713.
King. N. & Anderson. N. (1995). Innovation and change in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Press.
Knight Peter T. (1999). Innovation and Adaptation in Higher Education: The changing conditions of advanced teaching and learning in Europe Studies in Higher Education. 24, 3, 389-390.
Kotter,J.P. (1979). Managing external dependence. Academy of Management Review. 4, 87-92.
Kraatz, M. S. and Zajac, E. J. (1996).Exploring the limits of the news institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review. 61, 812-836.
McKinney, M. M., Kaluzny, A. D., & Zuckerman, H. S. (1991). Paths and pacemakers: Innovation diffusion networks in multihosptial systems and alliance. Health Care Management Review. 16, 2, 17-23.
Nohria, N., & Eccles, R.G. (1992).Networks and organizations.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
Oates, Keith (1997).Innovation is everybody’s bussiness.Management Services. 41, 5, 8-13.
Oliver(1990). Determinants of Interorganizational relationships：Integration and future directions, Academy of management review. 15, 2, 241-255
Pennings, J.M. (1981). Strategically interdependent organizations. Handbook of Organizational Design, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Pennings, J.M., & Harianto, F. (1992).The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry. Strategic Management Journal. 13, 29-46.
Pierce, J. L., & Delbecq, A. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. The Academy of Management Review. 2, 26-37.
Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization.In B. M.Staw&L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. 12, 295-336.
Rogers, E. M. (1983).Diffusion of Innovations. (3rd Ed). New York: Free Press.
Schopler J.H.（1987）Interorganizational groups: Origins, structure, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review. 12, 4, 702-713。
Sofer, S., & Myrtle, R. C. (1991). Interorganizational theory and research: Implications for health care management, policy, and research. Mediaal Care Review. 48, 371-409.
Sunal, D.W; Hodges Jeanelle; Sunal, Cynthia S; Whitaker, K.W. (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development
and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics. 101, 5, 246-257
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Elaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy. 15.
Thomas, J. B., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Information processing in strategic alliance building: A multiple-case approach. Journal of Management Studies. 30, 779-814.
Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal. 7, 37-51.
Tushman, M.L. & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly. 32, 439-465.
Utterback, J. M. & Hill, C. T (1979). Technological innovation for a dynamic economy. New York: Pergamon Press.
Watkins, K. E, Ellinger, and A. D. & Valentine, T. (1999) .Understanding support innovation in a largr-scale change effort: The manager-as-instructor approach. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 10, 1, 63-79.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets & Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.
Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: review, critique, suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies. 31, 3, 405-431. 。
Zuckerman, H. S. & D’Aunno, T. A. (1990). Hosptial alliance: Cooperative strategy in a competitive environment. Health Care Management Review. 15, 2, 21-30. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
幼兒教育所
89157002
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089157002 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
