English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47996950      Online Users : 866
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32883


    Title: 我國幼托園所長教學領導知覺之相關性研究
    A study on the awareness of instructional leadership by Taiwan`s preschool directors.
    Authors: 張君如
    Chang, Chun-Ju
    Contributors: 簡楚瑛
    Chien, Chu-Ying
    張君如
    Chang, Chun-Ju
    Keywords: 幼托園所
    幼托園所長
    幼托園所教師
    教學領導
    教學領導知覺
    kindergarten and preschool
    preschool directors
    preschool teachers
    instructional leadership
    awareness of instructional leadership
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 14:46:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來國內對學前教育研究之焦點漸跳脫課程與教學、教師與幼兒等範疇,而對學前教育組織(幼稚園、托兒所)或組織領導者(園所長)的關切亦日趨重視,亦顯現園所長對幼兒園教學品質的關係。本研究旨在探討台灣幼托園所長教學領導知覺及其相關因素。本研究採問卷調查法進行資料蒐集,問卷調查對象以台灣北、中、南、東四區共計7539公私立園所之園所長與教師為母群體,採分層隨機抽樣方式進行,對園所長與教師分別發出754份問卷,園所長部份回收400份(回收率53.05%),教師部份回收395份(回收率52.38%)。研究工具乃依據De Bevois(1984)、Murphy(1990)、李安明(2001)、及McEwan(2003)之理論與架構為基礎,經專家審題及預試結果,修正發展成適於國內幼教領域使用之「幼托園所長教學領導問卷」。問卷回收後以SPSS 12.01套裝軟體進行資料分析。資料分析方法主要採敘述統計、信度分析、因素分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及薛費多重比較法,作為資料處理方法。本研究之主要發現如下:
    一、 幼托園所長教學領導內涵包括五層面,包括:形成與傳遞園所教學目標、確保課程與教學品質、營造良好學習氣氛與工作環境、促進教師專業成長以及賦權教師。
    二、 幼托園所長與教師對「幼托園所長教學領導」知覺程度皆非常高,且無差異。
    三、 在幼托園所長部份,不同「年齡」、「服務年資」、「園所地區」、「園所性質」、「園所規模」者對「幼托園所長教學領導」知覺程度有所差異。
    四、 在幼托園所教師部份,不同「園所性質」、「園所規模」之幼托園教師對「幼托園所長教學領導」知覺程度有所差異。
    最後依據本研究結果分析與結論,對於幼托園所長、幼教行政機關與規劃園所長研習單位以及後續研究者提出具體建議以茲參考。
    Recently, the research focus of early childhood education has gradually put more emphasis on preschool directors in Taiwan. Much research has shown that preschool directors play a key role in preschool quality, and that their leadership also has an impact on preschools. Some scholars had emphasized that preschool directors’ leadership consist of two parts: administration leadership and instructional leadership. Somehow, there was gradually more research on administration leadership, but still very few on preschool directors’ instructional leadership.

    Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to understand the awareness of preschool directors’ instructional leadership between preschool directors themselves and preschool teachers in Taiwan. In addition, the study was also done to identify the background factors that would influence directors’ and teachers’ awareness of directors’ instructional leadership.

    This study was executed using a questionnaire survey. A sample population of 754 public and private preschool directors, along with 754 teachers, participated using the survey tool, Preschool Directors’ Instructional Leadership Questionnaire, which was developed by researcher according to literature review. 400 questionnaires (effective return rate is 53.05%) were returned by directors, and 395 (effective return rate is 52.38%) by teachers.

    This study reports four major findings:
    (1) Preschool directors’ instructional leadership includes 5 dimensions:(a)To frame and communicate the school’s instructional goals; (b)To ensure learning and teaching quality; (c) To build a positive learning and working climate; (d) To promote teachers’ professional growth; (e) To delegate authority to teachers.
    (2) Both preschool directors and teachers had very high-degree awareness of directors’ instructional leadership. And there was no difference between the directors’ and teachers’ awareness.
    (3) Different age, working experience, school area, school type, and school scale have influenced preschool directors’ awareness of their instructional leadership.
    (4) Different school type and scale have influenced preschool teachers’ awareness of directors’ instructional leadership.

    Keywords: awareness of instructional leadership, preschool directors、preschool teachers、kindergarten and preschool
    Reference: 參考文獻
    【中文部分】
    王有煌 (2003)。彰化縣國民小學校長學領導行為與師專業成長關係之研究。國立暨南國際大學育政策與行政學系未出版之碩士論文。
    王宗平 (2003)。國小校長教學領導對初任師專業成長影響之個案研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    尤崝、江麗莉 (2002)。新園長的工作檢視。幼教資訊,135,42-45。
    朱經明 (2001)。教育統計學(修訂版)。台北:五南。
    吳清山、林天祐 (2001)。教學領導。教育資料與研究,43,121。
    吳百錄 (2004)。學校領導—願景、領導與管理。高雄:復文。
    李玉林 (2001)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。國立台北師範學國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    李安明 (2001)。我國國民小學校長教學領導之研究。台北:心理。
    李清華 (2002)。國民小學教師之校長教學領導知覺、教師效能感與統課程實施態度之關係研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    李素銀 (2006)。幼托機構園(所)長領導取向及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所未出版未出版之碩士論文。
    林明地 (2002)。校長教學領導。校長學—工作分析與角色研究取向,151-186。台北:五南。
    高博銓 (2002)。析論校長的教學領導。中等教育,53(6),66-81。
    許玉齡 (1998)。桃竹地區幼稚園園長領導措施與教師工作滿意度之相關研究。新竹師範學院學報,11,281-300。
    許玉齡 (2001)。幼教品質繫於幼稚園園長。國教世紀,196,41-46。
    許玉齡 (2002)。公立幼稚園園長工作內容與角色。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報成果報告,計畫編號:NSC 90-2413-H-134-012。
    許玉齡 (2006)。國小附幼園長的工作角色塑造歷程。輯於國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所(主編),2006幼兒教育專業、品質與卓越學術研討會論文集編(頁3-2-1~3-2-7)。台北:國立政治大學。
    桃園縣桃園國民小學 (2005)。桃園縣幼稚園園長專業能力發展指引。桃園:桃園縣政府。
    張杏如 (2000)。幼稚園托兒所行政管理手冊。台北:信誼。
    張奕華 (2001)。APA第五版文末參考文獻之格式—以網路資源為例。教育研究月刊,91,74-81。
    張奕華 (2003)。APA出版手冊第五版本—文末參考文獻之格式。教育資料與研究,51,106-114。
    張春興 (2004)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:臺灣東華書局。
    張維倩 (2004)。幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    張慈娟 (1997)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    張衛族 (2002)。幼稚園園長的專業角色與任用制度。國立台北師範學院研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    教育部統計資料處 (2005)。幼稚園概況。Retrieved October 30, 2005, from http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/STATISTICS/EDU7220001/data/serial/k.htm?open
    黃瑞琴 (1996)。質的教育研究方法(第二版)。台北:心理。
    曾增福 (2003)。 桃園縣國民中學校長教學領導與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
    琳達‧蘭伯特 (2000)。教育領導:建構論的觀點(初版)(葉淑儀譯)。台北:桂冠。(原著出版年:1995年)
    葉重新 (2001)。教育研究法。台北:心理。
    葉連祺、徐昌義(2001)。中小學校長教學領導變革策略之分析。輯於輔仁大學(主編),「二十一世紀教育領導與發展」學術研討會論文集。台北:輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所。
    楊振昇 (1997)。「教學領導」理念之探討。輯於高強華(主編),學校教育革新專輯(頁236-263)。台北:國立臺灣師範大學。
    楊振昇 (1999)。我國國小校長從事教學領導概況、困境及其因應策略之分析研究。暨大學報,3(1),183-236。
    凱茲 (1995)。專業的幼教老師(初版)(廖鳳瑞譯)。台北:信誼
    榮泰生 (2006)。SPSS與研究方法。台北:五南。
    魯先華 (1994)。國民中學校長教學導之研究。國立臺灣師範大學育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    趙廣林 (1996)。國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    趙廣林 (2002)。校長教學領導的行動策略。中等教育,53(5),156-165。
    劉明德 (2005)。中小學校長教學領導核心技術關鍵之探討。學校行政雙月刊,38,65-75。
    臺北市政教育局 (1995)。幼稚園園長手冊。台北:作者。
    臺北市教師研習中心 (2000)。臺北市八十八學年度公私立幼稚園侯用園長儲訓班專刊(第一梯次)。台北:作者。
    臺北市教師研習中心 (2004)。臺北市九十一學年度私立幼稚園園長儲訓班專刊。台北:作者。
    蔡呈譽 (2003)。桃園縣國中教師對校長教領導行為知覺之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    蔡家吉 (2003)。國民中學校長教學領導之研究—以生活科技課程為例。國立臺灣師範大育學系未出版之碩士論文。
    盧美貴、許明珠 (2002)。費德勒權變領導理論在幼稚園園長領導之應用。台北市立師範學院院報,33,1-18。
    鮑世青 (2001)。國民小學校長與教師對「校長教學領導」行為知覺度之研究。新國立新竹師範學院進修暨推廣部教師在職進修國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班未出版之碩士論文。
    歐姿秀 (2002)。台灣近十五年幼兒園園長領導研究派典轉移之探究。幼兒教育年刊,14,177-202。
    賴春金(2003)。幼托園所長績效與風格之研究。台北:心理
    謝建成 (2001)。台北縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長之調查研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    謝建成 (2002)。校長教學領導之探究。研究資訊,19,6,44-50。
    簡楚瑛 (1995)。我國幼稚園教師教育信念之相關因素研究。行政院國家科學委會專題研究計畫成果報告,計劃編號:NSC84-2411-H134-009 。
    簡楚瑛 (1998)。淺談附幼校(園)長在幼稚園教學歷程中的領導角色。國教世紀,179,6-10。
    簡楚瑛 (2001)。幼稚園園長與托兒所所長角色及其所處園、所文化環境互動關係之研究。教育與心理研究,24,135-166。
    簡楚瑛、李安民 (2001)。幼稚園園長領導與管理行為之調查研究。輯於黃德祥(主編),教育改革與教育發展:葉學志教授祝壽論文專輯(頁187-236)。台北:五南。
    蘇慧貞、簡楚瑛 (2004)。幼兒園園長領導之個案研究。教育與心理研究,27(3),429-456。
    羅新炎 (2003)。校長教學領導行為與九年一貫課程實施之研究—以桃園縣國民中學為例。國立政治大學教育學院學校行政碩士班未出版之碩士論文。
    饒見維 (1996)。教師專業發展:理論與實務。台北:五南
    【西文部分】
    Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(6), 1913A. (UMI No. 3093602)
    Babbitt, K. J. (1991). Instructional leadership behaviors of principals and teachers` professional zone of acceptance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(2), 1952A. (UMI No. 9133786)
    Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349-378.
    Blasé, J. & Blasé, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning. Crowin Press: Thousand Oaks, California.
    Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
    Brewer, H. (2001). 10 steps to success. Journal of Staff Development, 22(1), 30-31.
    Chell, J. (1995). Introducing principals to the role of instructional leadership. Retrieved October 30, 2005, from: http://www.saskschoolboards.ca/research/leadership/95-14.htm
    Click, P. M. (1996). Administration of schools for young children. Albany, N.Y. : Delmar Publishers.
    Doyle, M. E. & Rice, D. M. (2002). A model for instructional leadership. Principal Leadership, 3(3), 49-53.
    Ellis, T. I. (1984). Teacher competency: What administrators can do. ERIC clearinghouse on educational management: ERIC Digest, Number Nine (ERIC No. ED259 452). Retrieved October 30, 2005, from ERICDIGESTS.ORG Web site: http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-922/teacher.htm
    Faulkenberry, T. M. (1996). A comparison of teachers’ perceptions of key instructional leadership behaviors and instructional leadership behaviors identified in effective schools’ leadership research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(3), 943A. (UMI No. 9623076)
    Grove, D. (2004). Revisiting instructional leadership in an era of accountability: A study of principals and their behaviors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(12), 4287A. (UMI No. 3115612)
    Gersten, R. & Carnine. (1981). Administrative and supervisory support functions for the implementation of effective educational program for low income student. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon.
    Greenfield, W. (1989). Moral imagination and interpersonal competence: Antecedents to instructional leadership. Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies.
    Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-248.
    Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. F. (1987). Assessing and developing principal instructional leadership. Educational Leadership, 45(1), 54-61.
    Hopkins, D. (2003). Instructional leadership and school improvement. In Harris, A., Day, C., Hopkins, D., Hadfield., Hargreaves, A. & Chapman, C(Ed.), Effective leadership for school improvement. London; New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
    Kibble, L. J. (2004). How instructional leadership is addressed in educational administration/ leadership Program. Andrew University, School of Education.
    Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 430-443.
    Larry, L. (2002). Developing instructional leaders. ERIC Digest 160. Retrieved October 30, 2005 from: http://eric.uoregon.edu/publications/digests/digest160.html
    Law, S. & Glover, D. (2000). Educational leadership and learning: Practice, policy and research. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. & Steinbach, R. Changing leadership for changing times : Changing leadership for changing times. Philadelphia, Pa. : Open University Press.
    Marsh, D. D. (1992). Enhancing instructional leadership: Lessons from the California school leadership academy. Education and Urban Society, 24(3), 386-409.
    McEwan, E. K. (2003). 7 steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Crown Press.
    Miles, M. T. (2002). The relative impact of principal instructional and transformational leadership on school culture. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(05), 1652A. (UMI No. 3052200).
    Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. Advance in Educational Administration, Vol.1, Part B: Changing Perspective on the School, p. 169. JAI Press.
    NAESP(2003). Urban principals respond: Building and maintaining a high-achieving school. Alexandria, Va.: Author.
    NAESP(2003). Urban principals respond : focusing school improvement on curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, Va.: Author; Arlington, Va.: Educational Research Service.
    NAESP(2004). Leading learning communities: NAESP standards for what principals should know and be able to do (3rd). Alexandria, Va.: Author.
    O’Donnell, R. (2003). Middle-level principals’instructional leadership behaviors and students achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(12), 4175A. (UMI No. 3073966)
    Parker, B. J. (1990). The principal as an instructional leadership in non-urban school. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(1), 46A. (UMI No. 9108370).
    Rossow, L. F. (1990). The principalship: Dimensions in instructional leadership. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
    Ruff, W. G. (2002). Constructing the role of instructional leader: The mental models of urban elementary school principals. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(05), 1656A. (UMI No. 3053468).
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (2005). The principalship : a reflective practice perspective. Boston, Mass.: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
    Smith, W. F., & Andrews, R. L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 73-91.
    Sybouts, W. & Wendel, F. C. (1994). The training and development of school principals: A Handbook. U.S.: Greenwood.
    Sydner, K. (1983). Instructional leadership for productive schools. Educational Leadership, 40(5), 32-37.
    Wanzare, Z. & DaCosta, J. L. (2001). Rethinking instructional leadership roles of the school principal: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Educational Thought, 35(3), 269-259.
    Wildy, H., & Dimmock, C. (1993). Instructional leadership in primary and secondary schools in western Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 31, No. 2, 43-53.
    Wilmore, E. L. (2004). Principal induction : A standards-based model for administrator development. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.
    Zepeda, S. J. (2003). The Principal as instructional leader: A Handbook for Supervisors. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    幼兒教育所
    93157010
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093157010
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    15701001.pdf49KbAdobe PDF2949View/Open
    15701002.pdf95KbAdobe PDF21027View/Open
    15701003.pdf194KbAdobe PDF2918View/Open
    15701004.pdf90KbAdobe PDF2988View/Open
    15701005.pdf135KbAdobe PDF21687View/Open
    15701006.pdf431KbAdobe PDF21593View/Open
    15701007.pdf355KbAdobe PDF21416View/Open
    15701008.pdf749KbAdobe PDF2995View/Open
    15701009.pdf212KbAdobe PDF21080View/Open
    15701010.pdf139KbAdobe PDF22395View/Open
    15701011.pdf311KbAdobe PDF21518View/Open
    15701012.pdf162KbAdobe PDF21323View/Open
    15701013.pdf213KbAdobe PDF21115View/Open
    15701014.pdf62KbAdobe PDF21049View/Open
    15701015.pdf202KbAdobe PDF21155View/Open
    15701016.pdf203KbAdobe PDF21198View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback