English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46119670      Online Users : 499
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33426


    Title: A Preliminary Study on the Effects of "Note-taking" Strategy on Different Proficiency Levels of Junior High School Students
    作筆記策略對不同程度的國中生在英語聽力訓練成效之初探
    Authors: 林惠嫻
    Lin, Huie-hsien
    Contributors: 彭欽清
    Peng, Chin-ching
    林惠嫻
    Lin, Huie-hsien
    Keywords: 聽力訓練
    作筆記策略
    國中生
    listening strategy
    note-taking
    junior high school
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:33:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文旨在探討作筆記(note-taking)是否能幫助英語為外語的國中生增進會話或短文的聽力能力。根據本研究生的經驗及本實驗對象的個人英語聽力學習狀況的問卷調查結果,學生對英語聽力測驗中的對話或短文題型最易受挫。因此本研究嘗試引進學習策略中的作筆記方式以幫助學生改善對這種題型的聽力能力。
      本論文所要探討的問題包含(1)受試者認為最難的聽力測驗題型是什麼?(2)國中生是否只重聽同樣內容及老師的測後解釋就能增進對話或短文測驗的英語聽力能力呢?(3)做筆記的學習者是否比未做筆記者進步?(4)作筆記策略適用程度高的學習者或程度低的學習者?(5)受試者對本實驗的意見:最有用和最無用的聽力測驗指導方式為何?受試者在此項實驗中改善最多的為那三樣?
      本實驗期約四個月,包含國三學生兩個班70個學生。一班為實驗班,另一班為對照班。為了進一步的比較,每一班再分為高、低分群。實驗班考聽力測驗時要作筆記,對照班則無此要求。所有的教材全取自康軒出版社,詹麗馨,李欣蓉編著的 “國中英語聽力測驗”第五冊。
      由統計分析及問卷調查得到下列結論:(1)國中生認為最困難的聽力測驗題型為聽完短文或對話後選出最適當的答案; (2)在實驗後,對照班及實驗班均進步並達顯著水準。由此可見若老師提供學習者重聽同樣的內容及測後講解聽力內容讓學生有更正的機會,學習者仍可以改善聽力能力;(3)雖然實驗班也進步並達顯著水準,但和對照班比較結果,不論是全班或高低分群,均未有顯著差異。可見做筆記的學習者並沒有比未做筆記者進步。這意謂著並非每種學習策略適合每個人,而且也沒有保證成功的學習策略。因此,老師應介紹各種學習策略以供學習者選擇有利個人學習的策略;(4)在實驗班中,低分群進步分數達顯著水準且和高分群的進步分數達顯著差異。顯然,作筆記策略嘉惠低分群但可能導致高分群無法專心聽;(5) 問卷調查結果發現大多數受試者認為老師試後講解聽力內容幫助最大;知道不同的口音助益最小。此外,依受試者意見顯示,作
    筆記可使學生不分心,養成記重點字的習慣並且容易記得內容。
      由以上研究,建議老師聽力測驗多播放幾次,並在測後講解內容及指導學生作筆記的方式。不過,作筆記較適合低分群而非高分群。因此,老師可以不要求高分群作筆記,避免影響他們的專心度。此外,本研究發現學習者很難去預測即將聽到的句子或內容。
    關鍵字;聽力訓練,作筆記策略,國中生
    This study aims to explore if note-taking could assist EFL junior high school students to improve their listening comprehension in the test style of “selecting anoptimal choice after listening to a dialogue or a short passage.” According to the researcher’s experience and the personal profile questionnaires of students, studentsfeel frustrated easily when they have a listening test on a dialogue or a short passage.
    Thus, the researcher tries to help them improve their listening comprehension in the test style by teaching them how to take notes.
    The research questions of this study included: (1) What is the most difficultlistening test style? (2) Could junior high school students improve their listening ability in understanding a dialogue or a short passage bylistening to the same content several times and through the teacher’s teaching instruction? (3) Did junior high school students who were asked to take notes perform better than those who were not? (4) Does note-taking benefit only high proficiency subjects or only low proficiency subjects? (5) How did the subjects feel about the experiment? What are the most useful and useless ways in a listening activity? What are the first three improved
    aspects the subjects felt after the experiment?
    The duration of this experiment was four months. Seventy of the third junior high school students from two classes were involved in the study. One class was assigned as an experiment class and the other as a control class. For further
    comparison, each class was subdivided into high and low proficiency groups. The experiment class was asked to take notes while listening but the control class was not.All the materials were adopted from “English Listening Comprehension for Junior High School”(Li-shin Jan, Shin-rung Li, 2001, Kan-shiuan Publisher).
    The statistical analyses and the questionnaires showed the following conclusions: (1) The most difficult listening test style was selecting an optimal choice after listening to a dialogue or a passage.(2) The classes made significant progress
    after the experiment. The result indicated that learners improved their listening ability when a teacher provided the students with sufficient practice by letting them listen to
    the same content several times and explained the meanings of the sentences after a listening test; (3) Although making significant progress, the experiment class, compared with the control class, did not improve significantly. The two different
    proficiency groups did not make significant progress, either. This could imply that not every learning strategy fits every learner. Also, no learning strategy assures success. Therefore, a teacher had better introduce different kinds of learning strategies for learners to choose an optimal learning strategy on their own; (4) In the experiment class, low proficiency learners made more progress than high proficiency ones at a
    significant level. Apparently, note-taking benefited low proficiency learners but may hinder high proficiency learners from concentrating on listening. (5) The subjects chose “teacher’s explanation of the content after a listening test” as the most useful way to improve their listening ability. However, they thought “knowing the different
    accents” as the least useful way. In addition, as seen in the result of the feedback questionnaire, note-taking helped learners listen without distraction, acquire a habit of
    writing down key words and remember the content easily.
    The research suggested that a teacher should let students listen to the same content several times on the tape, explain the meanings of the sentences after a listening test, and instruct learners how to take notes. However, note-taking was good for low proficiency learners, but not for high proficiency ones. Thus, a teacher might not need to ask high achievers to take notes, which might block them to concentrate on listening. In addition, it seems not easy for learners to predict the coming message.
    Key words: listening training, “note-taking strategy”, junior high school students
    Reference: Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Bacon, S. M. (1992). Phrases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: a descriptive study. Foreign Language Annuals, 25 (4), 317-334.
    Berliner, D. C. (1971). ATI in two studies of learning from lecture instruction. Berkeley, Calif.: Far West Lab for Educational Research & Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 046 249)
    Bernhardt,E. B. & James, C. J. (1987). The teacher and testing of comprehension in foreign language learning. Brickbitchler: Diane W., Ed. Paper presented at the 1987 Central States Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 285 420)
    Blau,E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed and pause on listening
    comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 746-753.
    Boyle, J. R. (1984). Factors affecting listening comprehension. ELT Journal, 38, 34-38.
    Brindley, G. P. (1982). Listening proficiency descriptions. Sydney: Adult Migrant Education Service.
    Brooks, N. (1964). Language and language learning.(2nd ed.) New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
    Brown, A. L. & Palinscar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategies learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
    Brown, E. D. (1985). Becoming a master student. Borough of Manhattan Community College.
    Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Brown, H, Douglas (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. London:
    Prentice Hall.
    Byrnes, H (1984). The role of listening comprehension: A theoretical base. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 317-329.
    Carrier, Carol A., & Titus, Amy. (1981). Effects of note-taking pre-training and test mode expectations on learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 18 (4), 385-397.
    Carroll, D. W. (1999). Psychology of language(3rd ed.). CA: ITP Inc.
    Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1992). Building bridges: Content and learning strategies for ESL. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: a bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
    Chastain Kenneth (1976). Developing second language skills: Theory to practice
    (2nd ed) Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
    Chiang, C. S. & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345-74
    Coakley, C. G., &Wolvin, A. D. (1986). Listening in the native language. In B.H. Wing (Ed.), Listening, reading, and writing: analysis and application. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
    Critical Languages Programs (2004). Hamilton College. [On-line]. Available: http://www.hamilton.edu/academics/clp/Content_pages/PAGE_CLPtape.html
    Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S.(1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8-14.
    Dunkel, P. A. (1986). Developing listening fluency in second language: the theoretical principles and pedagogical consideration. The modern language joural, 70 (2), 99-106.
    Dunkel, P. A. (1988). The content of L1 and L2 students’ lecture notes and its relation to test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 259-281.
    Dunkel, P. A. (1989). Effects of note taking, memory, and language proficiency on lecture learning for native and non-native speakers of English. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 543-549.
    Dunkel, P. A.(1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: toward an integration of research and prctice. TESOL Quaterly, 25 (3), 431-457.
    Emmert, P. (1994). A definition of listening. Listening Post, 51, 6.
    Fan, Y. (1993). Listening: problems and solutions. English Teaching Forum, 31(1), 16-19.
    Frase, L. T. (1970). Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors. Review of Educational research, 40, 337-347.
    Hale, G. A. & Courtney, R. (1991). Note taking and listening comprehension on the test of English as a foreign language. Research Reports, No. 34. Educational Testing Service.
    Hale, G. A. & Courtney, R. (1994). The effects of note taking on listening comprehension in the test of English as a foreign language. Language Testing, 11, 29-47.
    Henner-Stanchina, C. (1977). Evaluation in an autonomous learning scheme. Melanges Pedagogiques, 1977. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 149 630)
    Hsiung, W. L. (2002). An analysis on listening comprehension difficulties in junior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Huang, T. L. (2003). The effect of listening strategy instruction for junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Kiewra, Kenneth A. (1985). Learning from a lecture: An investigation of note-taking, review and attendance at a lecture. Human learning, 4, 73-77.
    Kiewra, Kenneth A., & Benton, Stephen L. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and note-taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33-44.
    Lee, H. M., (2001). The role of practice in successful EFL listening achievement for Taiwanese university English majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Taxas, Austin.
    Lightbown, Pasty M.(1985). Great Expectations: second language acquisition research
    and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics 6, 173-189
    Lin, S. H. (2000). A Study of listening comprehension strategies used by senior high school student in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Lin, Y. J. (2003). A case study on the effects of applying authentic materials as listening comprehension supplements for EFL senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Chengchi University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Long, D. R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65-80.
    Lung, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 75, 196-204.
    Mayer, R. D. (1975). Information processing variables in learning to solve problems. Review of Educational Research, 45, 525-541.
    McDonald, B.A. Dansereau, D. Garland, J. C. Holley, C.D. & Collins, K. W.(1979). Pair learning and transfer of text processing skills. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1979.
    Morton, J. & Patternson, M. (1987). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia, (2nd ed). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Murphy, J. M. (1985). Oral communication in TESOL: integrating speaking, listening and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (1), 51-73.
    Noblitt, James S. (2004). Cognitive approaches to listening comprehension. [On-line]. Available: http://www.unc.edu/cit/iat-archive/publications/noblitt/noblitt3.html
    O’Malley. J. M. (1987). The effects of training in use of learning strategies. In Wendon, A., and Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learning strategies in language learning. Great Britain: Prentice Hall.
    O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Ou, H. C. (1996). The effectiveness of teaching English comprehension. Studies in English and Literature, 1, 30-39.
    Oxford,L.R.(1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.
    Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle
    Peter, R. J. & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 514-522
    Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure.
    TESOL Quarterly 17, 219-240
    Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Rivers,Wilga M.(1981). Teaching foreign language skills.(2nd ed). Chicago:
    University of Chicago Press
    Rost, M.(1990). Listening in language learning. New York: Longman.
    Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learners” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
    Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 78, 179-189.
    Sebranek, P. & Meyer, V. (1985). Basic English revisited: A student handbook. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 253 883).
    Shohamy, E. & Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: the effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8, 23-40.
    Teng, H. C. (1997). An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students. Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching, Taiwan, ROC.
    Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press
    Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. New York: Longman
    Vandergrift, L. (1996). Listening strategies of core French high school students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (2), 200-223.
    Willis, J. (1981). Teaching English through English. London: Longman.
    Zheng, P. S. (1995). The effects of note-taking on Chinese college students’ listening comprehension performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    90951019
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    95101901.pdf45KbAdobe PDF21218View/Open
    95101902.pdf11KbAdobe PDF21084View/Open
    95101903.pdf85KbAdobe PDF21640View/Open
    95101904.pdf39KbAdobe PDF21198View/Open
    95101905.pdf23KbAdobe PDF23040View/Open
    95101906.pdf63KbAdobe PDF23886View/Open
    95101907.pdf52KbAdobe PDF21225View/Open
    95101908.pdf43KbAdobe PDF21247View/Open
    95101909.pdf21KbAdobe PDF21316View/Open
    95101910.pdf24KbAdobe PDF23012View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback