English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 111321/142230 (78%)
造訪人次 : 48402213      線上人數 : 832
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/49523
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49523


    題名: 企業破壞式創新程度與績效:台灣資訊電子業之實證研究
    Innovation disruptiveness and firm performance:A Study of Taiwan information technology industry
    作者: 李垂泰
    Eric Lee
    貢獻者: 黃 國 峯
    Huang, Kuo Feng
    李垂泰
    Eric Lee
    關鍵詞: 破壞式創新
    創新策略
    企業破壞式創新程度
    disruptive innovation
    innovation strategy
    company`s disruptiveness
    日期: 2007
    上傳時間: 2010-12-08 13:10:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 摘要
    本研究之目的在透過實政研究方法回答兩個關於破壞式創新研究問題,首先,產業延續性創新速度與企業破壞式創新程度之關係為何?其次企業的破壞式創新程度對其績效影響為何?本研究透過文獻探討,設計問卷並以台灣資訊電子產業公開發行之企業進行問卷調查蒐集初級資料。經由統計分析,本研究得出兩重大發現,首先,產業延續性創新速度與企業破壞式創新程度為負相關,而企業對新產品開發專案之決策資訊充足要求程度會弱化此關係。其次,企業規模與財務績效有正相關,而企業破壞式創新程度會強化此關係。
    The aim of this research is to answer two research questions about disruptive innovation with empirical methodology. First, what is the relation between industrial sustaining innovation rate and a company`s disruptiveness. Second, does a company’s disruptiveness impact firm financial performance? By collecting primary data, this research developed the questionnaire based on literature review and collected data from the publicly-listed companies in the Taiwan IT industry. With statistic analysis, this research has two significant findings. First, industrial sustaining innovation rate has a negative impact on an incumbent company’s disruptiveness and the accuracy of company investment decision on NPD project will weaken this relation. Second, firm size has a positive impact on firm financial performance and a company`s disruptiveness will strengthen this relationship.
    參考文獻: Abernathy, W.J., Clark. K.B., (1985). Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.
    Adner, R., (2002). When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23,8, 667–688.
    Alexander, S.S., (1949). The effecs of size of manufacturing corporation on the distribution of rate of return. Review of Economics, Nov., 229-235.
    Amato, L., and Wilder, R.P. (1985). The effects of firm size on profit rates in U.S. manufacturing. South. Econ. J., 52(J), 181-190.
    Assink, M., (2006), Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation, Vol.9, Iss. 2, 215-234.
    Baumol, W., (1967). Business behavior value and growth, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Betz, F. (1991). Next-Generation Technology and Research Consortia. International Journal of Technology Management, special issue, 298-310.
    Betz, F. (2003). Managing Technological Innovation. Wiley, 2003.
    Charitou, C.D., and Markides, C.C. (2003). Responses to Disruptive Strategic Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2), 55-63.
    Christensen, C.M., (1992). Exploring the limits of the technology S-Curve. Part I:Component Technologies. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 1, No. 4, Fall 1992, 334-357.
    Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA..
    Christensen, C.M., and Bower, J.L., (1996). Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218.
    Christensen, C.M.,. Raynor, M.E. (2003). The innovators’solution. Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA..
    Coe, J.T. (1986). Measuring the success of R&D Innovations. National Productivity Review, Summer 1982, 330-335.
    Cooper, D.R., and Schindler, P.S., (2003). Business research methods 8th , McGrawHill.
    Danneels, E., (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21, 246-258
    Denning, S., (2005). Why the best and brightest approaches don’t solve the innovation dilemma. Strategy&Leadership, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 4-12.
    Garcia, R., and Calantone, R. (2001). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review. The Journal of Produt Innovation Management, Vol. 19, 110-132.
    Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commiment. Havard Business School.
    Gilbert, C. (2003). The disruption opportunity. Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 27-32.
    Govindarajan, V., and Kopalle, PK. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations:Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategy Management Journal, Vol. 27, 189-199.
    Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, 429-59.
    Hall, M., and Weiss, L. (1967). Firm size and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 319-331.
    Heany, D.F. (1983). The degrees of product innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, Spr. 83, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, 3-14.
    Jeffrey, P., and Gerald, R.S. (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper&Row, New York.
    Joseph, F.H., William, C.B., Barry, J.B., Rolph, E.A., and Ronald, L.T. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.
    Kim, L. (1986). Invasion of a stable business by radical innovation. P.R. Kleindorfer, ed. The Management of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing. Plenum Press, New York.
    Lin, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysis─SPSS Operation and Application. Best-Wise Press.
    Linder, J.C. (2006). Does innovation drive profitable growth?New metrics for a complete picture. The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 27, Iss. 5, 38.
    Marquis, D.G. (1960). The Anatomy of Successful Innovations. Innovation, November. Reprinted in Readings in the Management of Innovation, Tushman M.L., Morres, W.L., and Pitman, E.D. Marshfield, MA, 1982.
    Miller, D. (1990). The Icarus Paradox. New York Harper Business.
    Montoya-Weiss, M.M., and Calantone, R.J. (1994). Determinants of new product performance:a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11, 397-417.
    Rafael, L., Ricardo, C., and Joaquin, A. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 333-346.
    Sahal, D. (1981). Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison-Wesley, London.
    Salavou, H. (2002). Profitability in market-oriented SMEs:does product innovation matter. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 164-171.
    Shapiro, A.R. (2006). Measuring Innovation:Beyond revenue from new products. Research Technology Management, Vol. 49, Iss. 6, 42-51.
    Souder, W., and Sherman, J. (1994). Managing New Technology Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Starbuck, W.H. (1988). Why organizations run into crises…and sometimes survive them. K. Laudon, J. Turner, eds. Information Technology and Management Strategy. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 11-33.
    Steindl, J. (1945). Small and Big Business:Economic Problems of the Size of Firms. Oxford University Press, London.
    Stekler, H.O. (1964). The variability of profitability with size of firms. Journal of the American Statistical Association. Dec., 1183-93.
    Tidd, J., Bessant, J., and Pavitt, k. (2003). Managing Innovation. Wiley.
    Thor, C.G., (1991). Performance measurement in a research organization. National Productivity Review.
    Wen, Z., and Bullard, S.H. (2008). Firm size and competitive advantage in the U.S. upholstered, wood household furniture industry. Forest Products Journal, Vol. 58, No. 1/2, 91-96.
    Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.N., (1992). Revolutionizing product development─Quantum leas in speed, efficiency, and quality. The Free Press, New York.
    Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.N. (1992). Organizing and leading heavyweight development teams. California Management Review, Spr. 34, Iss. 3, 9-28.
    Zahra, S.A., and Das, S.R. (1993). Innovation strategy and financial performance in manufacturing companies:an empirical study. Product and Operations Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, 90-101.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    95355013
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095355013
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    501301.pdf46KbAdobe PDF2727檢視/開啟
    501302.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2647檢視/開啟
    501303.pdf39KbAdobe PDF2657檢視/開啟
    501304.pdf42KbAdobe PDF2722檢視/開啟
    501305.pdf157KbAdobe PDF22258檢視/開啟
    501306.pdf49KbAdobe PDF21695檢視/開啟
    501307.pdf117KbAdobe PDF2808檢視/開啟
    501308.pdf20KbAdobe PDF2877檢視/開啟
    501309.pdf38KbAdobe PDF21248檢視/開啟
    501310.pdf128KbAdobe PDF2846檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋