English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46249876      Online Users : 994
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67284


    Title: Fallacies in Embracing a Silent European Public—A Post Lisbon Treaty Analysis
    Other Titles: 後里斯本條約時期「沉默的歐洲大眾」：負面意涵之分析
    Authors: 盧倩儀
    Lu, Chien-Yi
    Contributors: 歐洲語文學系
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;里斯本條約;憲法條約;自由派政府間主義;政治化
    the European Union;Treaty of Lisbon;Constitutional Treaty;Liberal Intergovernmentalism;politicization
    Date: 2010.12
    Issue Date: 2014-07-03 16:07:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 里斯本條約於2009年12月1日生效，取代尼斯條約成為歐洲聯盟一切運作之根本。歐盟此一回合之條約改革從一場針對「歐洲之未來」的全歐跨國大辯論演化為由制憲會議所主導之歐盟制憲運動，而後在2005年法國及荷蘭選民公投否決了憲法條約後，整個條約改革進程嘎然而止。在經過了一段思考蟄伏期之後，透過與制憲時期極其不同但卻是會員國所最為熟悉之傳統修約方式，歐盟以里斯本條約取代憲法條約，並獲得了會員國一致支持。本文針對公民在條約改革當中的參與及影響力就「制憲模式」與「里斯本模式」進行比較。結論指出，儘管排除公民之參與及影響就短期而言似乎致使整合進行較為順利，但長期而言卻為整合埋下更多阻力及變數。
    On 1 December 2009, the Treaty of Lisbon replaced the Treaty of Nice as the legal foundation of the European Union. The round of treaty reform that eventually produced the Treaty of Lisbon started off with a Europe-wide debate, adventured into a Constitution-making process, and came to a halt when French and Dutch voters rejected the Constitutional Treaty in 2005. It was with an approach radically different from the one used in the making of the Constitutional Treaty yet comfortably in line with the routine treaty-reform business of the Union that essence of the Constitutional Treaty was rescued. This article compares the approaches adopted in the making of the Constitutional Treaty and the making of the Treaty of Lisbon in terms of the degree to which the public was allowed or encouraged to play a role. It further discusses the implications of this detour of treaty-reform process for future developments of European integration and concludes that the continual exclusion of the public from policy-making and treaty-reform constrains rather than facilitates integration.
    Relation: 東吳政治學報, 28(4), 37-92
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[歐洲語文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    3792.pdf301KbAdobe PDF21018View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback