English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110940/141868 (78%)
Visitors : 47578846      Online Users : 520
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94617


    Title: 英語教學做中學:合作敘事探究
    Learning to Teach English in situ: A Collaborative Narrative Inquiry
    Authors: 陳錦珊
    Chen, Jin shan
    Contributors: 招靜琪
    Chao, Chin chi
    陳錦珊
    Chen, Jin shan
    Keywords: 英語師資培訓
    英語教學發展
    敘事探究
    行動理論
    情境學習理論
    TESOL Teacher Education
    Learning to Teach
    Narrative Inquiry
    Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
    Situated Cognition
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 11:21:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇論文重組並重現一個合作敘事探究的生命經驗。在這集體的生命故事中,研究者與四位女性英語實習教師,透過一個全校性的英語同儕輔導計畫,一同探究學習如何教英語。本研究包含兩個研究重點:(一)探索英語實習教師在教學實習過程中對英語教學的概念覺知與教學發展;(二)檢視機構與社會情境與英語實習教師之教學發展的互動關係。本研究提出三個研究問題核心,協助對於現象的分析與詮釋:(一)英語實習教師在實境教學中教學發展之轉化歷程;(二)驅動英語實習教師之教學發展轉化的支配力類型;(三)英語實習教師對於實境教學之生命經驗的理解與覺知。
    本研究發現,英語實習教師的教學發展,呈現前進式的結構模式。教學行動系統中的內、外部矛盾,引發一連串的衝突與失序,直接衝擊英語實習教師的教學發展轉化。在問題解決的轉化過程中,有三種主要的驅動能量,對教學發展轉化形成支配:情境支配力、策略支配力、情意支配力。在故事的尾聲,英語實習教師對於英語教學有新的覺知:對於教學行為及身為英語教師本體的覺知、對於英語學習者的認知、對於英語學習的本質的理解。
    本研究回應相關文獻,提出三點新發現。首先,學習如何教的過程,包含持續性的觀察、分析、評量和反思。其次,英語實習教師的教學發展,透過跨層次行動系統的比對與分析,發現並理解可能存在的失序、衝突與解決方案,進而從事教學改變與教學發展轉化。最後,本研究提出,有關教師學習、學習如何教的相關研究,應該採用一種全方位的研究方法、一種廣泛理解的觀點,用以分析詮釋實作教學中既存的知識斷層。
    This collaborative narrative inquiry reconfigures and represents the lived experiences of four female prospective TESOL teachers’ learning to teach through a campus-based tutoring program. The research foci of this inquiry-based study are twofold. Firstly, the research aims at exploring how prospective TESOL teachers learn to teach through practical teaching experiences, as they examine the definition of learning to teach itself and the understanding of the what and how of the learning process evolves. Secondly, the research investigates the role of the social and institutional context in prospective TESOL teachers’ learning to teach, in examining how activity setting shapes the process of learning to teach. Drawing on the research approach of narrative inquiry, prospective TESOL teachers’ stories are told in their own voices while the school’s stories, and the stories about the school are told by the supervisor of the structured program in this research, the researcher, for purpose of providing a context to the prospective TESOL teachers’ stories. Following such respects, research questions are generated with special emphasis on (a) the transformational process of the prospective TESOL teachers’ learning to teach in situ; (b) the driving forces for the transformation to take place; (c) how the prospective TESOL teachers make sense of the lived experiences of learning to teach.
    The prospective teachers’ collective story appeared to be a progressive mode of development. The transformational process was overwhelmingly influenced by the dissonance and conflicts emerging from the contradictions within and across the collective activity system of teaching, namely primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary contradictions. In order to solve the problems resulting from the contradictions, the prospective teachers undertook changes and transformation in their teaching. Three types of driving force appeared to be significant for the transformation in the process of the prospective teachers’ learning to teach, including contextual force, strategic force, and attitudinal force. During the process of engaging in the socially situated activity of teaching, the prospective teachers formulated new conceptualizations of teaching, inclusive of the understanding of their teaching and of themselves as English teachers, of the students as English learners, and of the nature of English learning.
    The findings of the research suggest that a campus-based tutoring EFL program could be an alternative form of practicum teaching. Corresponding to previous research into teachers’ learning and learning to teach in second and foreign languages, three notions are provided. Firstly, the process of learning to teach prospective teachers includes continuous observation, analysis, evaluation and reflection on the entirety of the teaching activity embedded within a specific context, rather than shifting their focus from one entity to another entity, such as focusing on themselves at early stage and then shifting their focus to either on students or instructional techniques. Secondly, the process of prospective teachers’ learning to teach includes changes and transformation following iterative analysis and interpretations of cross-level activity systems to determine possible dissonance and solutions with the help of structured resources. Thirdly, research into teachers’ learning should employ a holistic research approach with a comprehensive perspective in analyzing and interpreting existing gaps in teaching practice.
    Reference: Almarza, G. G. (1996). Student foreign language teacher’s knowledge growth. In
    D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.) Teacher learning in language teaching (pp.
    50-78). NY: Cambridge University.
    Ashton, P. T. (2003). Improving the preparation of teachers. Educational Researcher.
    25(9): 21-35.
    Bailey, F. (1996). The role of collaborative dialogue in teacher education. In
    D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.) Teacher learning in language teaching (pp.
    260-280). NY: Cambridge University.
    Bailey, K. (2001). Teacher preparation and development. TESOL Quarterly.
    35(4):609-611.
    Beattie, M. (2000). Narratives of professional learning: Becoming a teacher and
    learning to teach. Journal of Educational Enquiry. 1(2): 1-23.
    Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly.
    36(2): 207-218
    Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating
    narrative inquiry. In J. Hatch & R. Wisniewsky (Ed.) Life history and narrative
    (pp.25-36). London: The Falmer Press.
    Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what
    language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching. 36: 81-109.
    Borko, H. & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C.
    Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). NY:
    Macmillan.
    Browns, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of
    learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1): 32-42.
    Bruner, J. (1985). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University
    Press.
    Chao, C. (2005). Encouraging self-regulated EFL learning in Taiwanese higher
    education: Activity types and analysis. English Teaching & Learning. 29(4):1-20.
    Chen, J. (2007, Fall). A narrative inquiry to web-enhanced language learning
    autonomy through Sociocultural Theory. Paper presented at the Independent
    Learning Association Japan 2007 Conference. Chiba, Japan.
    Clair, N. (1998). Teacher study groups: persistent questions in a promising approach.
    TESOL Quarterly. 32(3): 465-492.
    Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N. K.
    Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413-427).
    Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
    Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge
    landscapes: teacher stories, stories of teachers, school stories, stories of school.
    Educational Researcher. 25(3): 24-30.
    Clandinin, J., Connelly, M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in
    qualitative research. CA: John Wiley & Sons.
    Clandinin, D. J., Pushor, D. & Orr, A. M. (2007). Navigating sites for narrative
    inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education. 58(1): 21-35.
    Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research:
    the issues that divide. Educational Researcher. 19(2): 2-11.
    Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice:
    teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education. 24: 249-305.
    Cole, A. L. & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Teacher development partnership research: a
    focus on methods and issues. American Educational Research Journal. 30(3):
    473-495.
    Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1990). Cognitive apprenticeship:
    Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),
    Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.
    453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Conle, C. (2001). The rationality of narrative inquiry in research and professional
    development. European Journal of Teacher Education. 24(1): 21-33.
    Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
    traditions. CA: Sage.
    Crossley, M. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the
    construction of meaning. PA: Open University Press.
    Dallmer, D. (2004). Collaborative relationships in teacher education: a personal
    narrative of conflicting roles. Curriculum Inquiry. 34(1): 29-44.
    Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413-427).
    Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Duff, P. A. & Uchida, Y. (1997). The negotiation of teachers sociocultural identities
    and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly. 31(3):
    451-486.
    Dufficy, P. J. (1993). The pedagogy of pre-service TESOL. Journal of Education for
    Teaching. 19(1): 83-97.
    Elbaz-Luwisch, F. (2007). Studying teachers’ lives and experience: Narrative inquiry into K-12 teaching. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.) Handbook of narrative inquiry:
    Mapping a methodology (pp.357-382). CA: Sage Publications.
    EngestrÖm, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to
    development research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
    EngestrÖm, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of
    knowledge creation in practice. In Y. EngestrÖm, R. Miettinen & R-L. Punamaki
    (Eds.) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    EngestrÖm, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical
    reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work. 14(1): 133-156.
    Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer tutoring in higher education. NY: RoutledgeFalmet.
    Feiman-Nemser, S. & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives of learning to teach. In M.
    Wittrock (Ed.) The teacher educators’ handbook (pp. 63-91). San Francisco:
    Jossey-Bass.
    Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in
    research on teaching. In L. D. Hammond (Ed.) Review of research in education,
    20 (pp.3-56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
    Freeman, D. (1996). The “unstudied problem”: Research on teacher learning in
    language teaching. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Ed.), Teacher learning in
    language teaching (pp. 351-378). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    Freeman, D. (2001). Teacher learning and student learning in TESOL. TESOL
    Quarterly. 35(4):608-609.
    Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: teacher knowledge and learning to
    teach. Language Teaching. 35: 1-13.
    Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of
    language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly. 32(3): 397-417.
    Freeman, D. & Richards, J. (1996). Prologue: A look at uncritical stories. In
    D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.) Teacher learning in language teaching (pp.
    1-6). NY: Cambridge University.
    Freeman, D. & Richards, J. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of
    second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly. 27(2): 193-216.
    Freeman, D. & Richards, J. (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. NY:
    Cambridge University.
    Freidus, H. (2002). Narrative research in teacher education: New questions, new
    practices. In N. Lyons & V. K. Laboskey (Eds.) Narrative inquiry in pactice:
    Advancing the knowledge of teaching (pp. 160-172). NY: Teacher College,
    Columbia University.
    Gimbert, B. G. (2001, Spring). Learning to teach: the lived experience of being an
    intern in a professional developmental school. Paper presented at the annual
    meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
    Glaser, B. (1992). Emerging vs. forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. CA:
    Sociology Press.
    Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
    Glesne, C. & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction.
    NY: Longman Publishing Group.
    Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. NY:
    Routledge.
    Gee, J., Michaels, S. & O’Connor, M. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. LeCompte,
    W. Millroy & J. Preissle (Ed.) The handbook of qualitative research in
    education (pp. 227-291). CA: Academic Press.
    Golombek, P. R. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge.
    TESOL Quarterly. 32(3): 447-464.
    Groosse, C. U. (1991). The TESOL methods course. TESOL Quarterly. 25(1): 29-49.
    Hedgcock, J. S. (2002). Toward a socioliterate approach to second language teacher
    education. The Modern Language Journal. 86(3): 219-317.
    Haneda, M. (2006). Classroom as communities of practice: a reevaluation. TESOL
    Quarterly. 40(4): 807-817.
    Hanks, W. F. (1991). Foreword by William F. Hanks. In J. Lave & E. Wenger
    (pp.13-24). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Hatch, J. & Wisniewsky, R. (1995). Life history and narrative: questions, issues, and
    exemplar works. In J. Hatch & R. Wisniewsky (Ed.) Life history and narrative
    (pp.113-136). London: The Falmer Press.
    Huizen, P. V., Oers, B. V., & Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher
    education. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 37(3): 267-290.
    Johnson, K. E. (1992). Learning to teach: instructional actions and decisions of
    preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly. 26(3): 507-535.
    Johnson, K. E. (1996a). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly.
    30(4): 765-771.
    Johnson, K. E. (1996b). The vision versus the reality: the tensions of the TESOL
    practicum. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.) Teacher Learning in Language
    Teaching (pp. 30-49). NY: Cambridge University.
    Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second langauge
    teacher education. TESOL Quarterly. 40(1):235-257.
    Johnson, K., Golombek, P. (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional
    development. NY: Cambridge University.
    Johnson, K. E. & Golombek, P. R. (2003). “Seeing” teacher learning. TESOL
    Quarterly. 37(4): 729-737.
    Josselson, R., Lieblich, A. & McAdams, D. P. (2002). Up close and personal: The
    teaching and learning of narrative research. Washington, DC: American
    Psychological Association.
    Knezevic, A. & Scholl, M. (1996). Learning to teach together: Teaching to learn
    together. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.) Teacher learning in language
    teaching (pp. 79-96). NY: Cambridge University.
    Lantolf, J. P. (2001). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.).
    Sociocultural theory and second language learning. NY: Oxford University
    Press.
    Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second
    language development. NY: Oxford University Press.
    Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 3(3):
    1996.
    Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY: Cambridge University.
    Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R. & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: reading,
    analysis, and interpretation. CA: Sage.
    Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. CA: Sage Publications.
    Lo, G.., Chao, C. & Yeh, V. (2005, Summer). Collaborative inquiry as a model for
    EFL professional development: Focusing on the community building. Paper
    presented in the 4th Biennial Language Teacher Education Conference.
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
    Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of
    Chicago Press.
    Lyons, N., LaBoskey, V. (2002). Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the
    knowledge of teaching. NY: Teachers College.
    Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. CA:
    Jossey-Bass Inc
    Moran, P. R. (1996). “I’m not typical”: stories of becoming a Spanish teacher. In
    D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.) Teacher learning in language teaching (pp.
    125-153). NY: Cambridge University.
    Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action
    models, and distributed cognition. In Bonnie A. Nardi (Ed.). Context and
    consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (Chapter 4, pp.
    68-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Nespor, J. & Barylske, J. (1991). Narrative discourse and teacher knowledge.
    American Educational Research Journal. 28(4): 805-823.
    Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: insights from diary studies.
    TESOL Quarterly. 30(1): 131-153.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.
    MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Pinnegar, S. & Daynes, J. G. (2007). Locating narrative inquiry historically:
    Thematics in the turn to narrative. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.) Handbook of
    narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp.3-34). CA: Sage Publications.
    Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. Hatch
    & R. Wisniewsky (Ed.) Life history and narrative (pp.5-24). London: The
    Falmer Press.
    Putman, R. T. & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: implications of new views of
    cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International
    handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223-1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Putman, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking
    have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Research. 29(1):
    4-15.
    Richards, J. C. & Crookes, G. (1988). The practicum in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly.
    22(1): 9-27.
    Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. CA: Sage Publication.
    Ritchie, J. S. & Wilson, D. E. (2000). Teacher narrative as critical inquiry: Rewriting
    the script. NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Rust, F. O. (1999). Professional conversations: new teachers explore teaching through
    conversation, story, and narrative. Teaching and Teacher Education. 19-367-380.
    Schulz, R. (2000). Foreign language teacher development: MLJ perspectives –
    1916-1999. The Modern Language Journal. 84: 495-522.
    Schulz, R., Schroeder, D. & Brody, C. M. (1997). Collaborative narrative inquiry: fidelity and the ethics of caring in teacher research. Qualitative studies in
    education. 10(4): 473-485.
    Stauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1999). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
    procedures for developing grounded theory. CA: Sage Publications.
    Stoynoff, S. (1999). The TESOL practicum: an integrated model in the U.S. TESOL
    Quarterly. 33(1): 145-151.
    Tedick, D. J. & Walker, C. L. (1994). Second language teacher education: the
    problems that plague us. The Modern Language Journal. 78(3): 300-312.
    Throne, (2005).
    Throne, S. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in Sociocultural Theory. The
    Modern Language Journal. 89(3): 393-409.
    Topping, K. (1996). Effective peer tutoring in further and higher education: a
    typology and review of the literature. Higher Education. 32: 321-345.
    Tsui, A. (1996). Learning how to teach ESL writing. In D. Freeman & J. Richards
    (Eds.) Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 97-119). NY: Cambridge
    University.
    Tsui, A. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL
    teacher. TESOL Quarterly. 41(4): 657-680.
    Watson-Gegeo, (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: toward a language
    socialization paradigm for SLA. The Modern Language Journal. 88: 331-350.
    Watzke, J. (2007). Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: toward a developmental
    theory of beginning teacher practices. The Modern Language Journal. 91:63-82.
    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identities.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J. & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research
    on learning to teach: making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry.
    Review of Educational Research. 68(2): 130-178.
    Zaho, H. & Poulson, L. (2006). A biographical narrative inquiry into teachers’
    knowledge: An intergenerational approach. Asia Pacific Education Review. 7(2):
    123-132.
    Zahorik, J. (1986). Acquiring teaching skills. Journal of Teacher Education. 27(2):
    21-25.
    Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational
    Researcher. 28(4): 4-15.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系
    90551504
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0905515041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2428View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback