English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48383106      Online Users : 825
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98164


    Title: 近似值測量之改良及應用--基於命題之概念圖結構分析
    Other Titles: Proposition Based Closeness Measure for Concept Maps
    Authors: 邱瓊慧 ; 莊巧華 ; 賴宗誠
    Keywords: 概念圖;命題圖;近似值測量;計分
    Concept map ; Proposition map ; Closeness measure ; Scoring
    Date: 2005-06
    Issue Date: 2016-06-21 16:50:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Goldsmith 等人之近似值測量，原是針對一般知識結構的分析，也被建議用在概念圖的計分上，其效果亦受肯定。該測量主要在比較兩知識圖的相似程度，只要兩圖中同一節點及其鄰近節點相同，便被視為具有相同的結構。如此一來，運用此方法分析概念圖時，概念間的連結關係便會被忽略。然而，概念和連結共同組成的命題才是概念圖中構成有意義知識的最小單位，本研究因此針對 Goldsmith 等人之測量法的應用進行改良，建議將分析的基礎由「概念」轉化為「命題」節點。本研究並透過一電腦化概念構圖工具蒐集197份學生的概念圖資料，以概念圖典型的 Novak 與 Gowin 計分法所得之分數為效標，來檢驗此轉化及應用的有效性。資料分析結果顯示，以命題為主的近似值測量結果與效標分數之 Pearson 相關係數（r= .888, p< .01）顯著高於以概念為主的近似值測量結果與效標分數的相關係數（r= .712, p< .01）。
    Goldsmith et al.`s closeness measure, developed for evaluating structural representation of knowledge, has been applied to assess concept maps and the effectiveness has been positively affirmed. The measure quantifies the configural similarity between two networks by examing the degree to which the same node in two graphs is surrounded by a similar neighborhood of nodes. Once it is applied to concept map scoring, it would neglect the meaning relationship between concepts. Considering a proposition is the basic unit of meaning in a concept map, this study proposed that a concept map be transformed into a proposition-based map before applying the closeness mesure. To validate the approach, 197 students` concept maps were collected and scored. The scores derived by the closeness measure on the original concept maps and the transformed proposition based maps were compared with the scores by Novak and Gowin`s scoring scheme (criterion). The statistical analyses showed that the correlation between the scores from proposition based closeness measure and the criterion scores (r= .888, p< .01) was significantly higher than that between concept based closeness measusre and the criterion scores (r= .712, p< .01).
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 28(2),353-371
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Education ＆ Psychology] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2362View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback