English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111321/142230 (78%)
Visitors : 48413610      Online Users : 427
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98708


    Title: 影響績效自評的文化及情境因素之探討
    Other Titles: Cultural and Contextual Factors Affecting Self-Rating
    Authors: 顏志龍;趙舒禾;王榮春
    Keywords: 自謙偏差;自評傾向;自我概念;評估目的;評估方式
    Modesty bias;Self-concept;Self-rating;Appraisal purpose;Rating format
    Date: 2008-06
    Issue Date: 2016-07-04 11:54:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以?個子研究探討影響績效自評之文化及情境因素。研究一(N =120)以實驗法操?「評估目的」、「評?方式」,並測?受試者之個人傳統性。結果發現:(1)「個人傳統性」對自評傾向並無影響;(2)「評估目的」對於自評傾向有所影響,當評估目的為「實際考核」時,個體之自評高於「學術研究」;(3)「評?方式」對於自評傾向有影響,當個體被要求和他人比較時,其自評高於自我?照的評估。研究二(相關法;N = 319)結果顯示:(1)自評時高估者(寬大偏差)其「社會期許需求」高於低估者(自謙偏差);(2)低估者之「自我概?」比高估者?得負面。整體研究結果顯示,情境因素和自我概?是影響自評的重要因素;而相對??,文化價值觀對自評傾向之影響並?顯著。此外,本研究並未發現華人自評有自謙偏差傾向;相反地,多?受試者仍呈現出寬大偏差的傾向。
    Two studies were conducted to examine the cultural and contextual factors which affect self-rating. In Study 1 (N=120), it was found that (1) Ss tends to be more modest when the appraisal purpose is set for academic research instead of practical grading; (2) Ss tend to be more lenient when being asked to compare his performance with others; (3)Ss’ traditionality has no significant effect on self-rating. In study 2 (N=319), it was found that (1) there are no significant differences in need for interpersonal harmony between modest and leniency bias Ss; (2) modesty bias Ss expressed less social desirability than leniency ones; (3) modesty bias Ss are more negative in their selfconcepts than leniency ones and (4), as from study1, most Ss tend to express leniency bias rather than modesty bias.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 31(2),119-142
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Education & Psychology] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2411View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback