Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35669
|
| Title: | 我國公務人員報紙形象之分析：以聯合知識庫為例，1996-2004
The Newspaper Images of Bureaucrats in Taiwan: An Analysis of the United Daily News |
| Authors: | 陳明育
Chen, Ming Yu |
| Contributors: | 陳敦源
Chen, Don Yun
陳明育
Chen, Ming Yu |
| Keywords: | 公務人員
內容分析
框架分析
報紙
政黨輪替
bureaucrats
content analysis
frame analysis
newspaper
party turn-over |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 15:38:51 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 我國2000年總統大選結果為台灣帶來首次的政黨輪替，使我國在民主化的路程上更進一步地朝向民主鞏固(Democracy Consolidation)的階段，在這樣的時代中，公務人員必須更加重視民意，並在人民心中建立值得信賴的形象。而在人民的「腦海圖像」大多是由傳播媒體傳遞的訊息所建構而成的，故公共管理者須了解人民從傳播媒體獲得什麼樣的訊息，以及公務人員在傳播媒體上的形象究竟為何，才能對症下藥地進行公務人員的形象改造。
因此，本研究以聯合報系的電子資料庫「聯合知識庫」為分析資料的來源，資料範圍則為我國第一次總統大選前後各一任總統任期，即1996年5月20日到2004年5月19日的公務人員新聞，採用傳播學界的研究方法─內容分析與框架分析，分析上述時間範圍內的聯合報的新聞內容，以了解公務人員在報紙上所呈現的形象究竟為何，以及比較2000年政黨輪替前後公務人員的報導形象，是隨著執政黨的更替而有所不同。
結果發現，報紙給予公務人員的框架有三：「大人」、「公僕」及「員工」，其中以「公僕」為在新聞之中最常見的公務人員形象框架；再者，報紙多以中立立場、極短篇幅，以及純新聞的報導方式來報導公務人員。最後，如果比較政黨輪替前後的公務人員新聞之後，發現兩時期的公務人員皆被報紙視為「公僕」，而且多被給予負面的報導；但亦有所不同之處：政黨輪替之後，公務人員新聞的報導篇幅變小，對公務人員的評價負面新聞比例不變，但正面新聞比例有上升的趨勢。
In democratic polity, the important aspect of governance is public opinion. After the year of the first party turn-over, bureaucrats need to build reliable images in people’s head and try to earn their support for the policies. But, what is the images of bureaucrats in people’s head is an interesting but unsolved question for the field of public administration. To answer the question, the researcher tries to analyze the stories about bureaucrats in the media---the strong fourth branch of a democratic government.
By using content analysis and frame analysis, this research uses the data collected from the news in the United Daily News to answer the above questions. Between the years of 1996 to 2004, 998 sample news are selected from the database of UDNDATA.
The findings are as follows: First of all, as a whole, there are three types of newsframes of bureaucrats utilized: “authoritarians”, “public servants”, and “employees”, and the newsframe of public servant appears to be the most popular one. Secondly, bureaucrats’ news is covered in less than 500 words and in the tone of neutrality and negativity. Thirdly, there is no difference in newsframe between the news before and after the first party turn-over. However, the news space is getting
shorter and the amounts of positive coverage are increased after the year of 2000. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文資料
卜正珉
2003 公共關係─政府公共議題決策管理，台北市：揚智文化。
王石番
1991 傳播內容分析法─理論與實證，台北市：幼獅。
1995 民意理論與實務，台北：黎明文化。
王洪鈞
1987 大眾傳播與現代社會，台北市：正中。
王淑慧
2003 警察形象行銷之研究─以台北市政府警察局為例，國立台北大學公共
行政暨政策學系研究所碩士論文。
張佑宗譯(Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan原著)
1997 「邁向鞏固的民主體制」，收錄於田弘茂、朱雲漢、Larry
Diamond and Marc Plattner主編，鞏固第三波民主，頁65-
96，台北市：業強。
史順文
1996 國軍形象之硏究 : 一個公共關係策略初探，政治作戰學校新聞硏究
所碩士論文。
甘惟中
2004 初探台灣新聞報導中的公關與公共關係面貌：以1991至2003年新聞
報導之內容分析為例，國立政治大學廣告硏究所碩士論文。
伍世裕
1985 警察形象綜合指標曁其構成因素分析：台北市實證分析硏究，中央
警官學校警政硏究所碩士論文。
呂育誠、陳恆鈞、陳菁雯、劉淑惠合譯(David H. Rosenbloom〈1998,
4th ed.〉原著)
2000 公共行政學：管理、政治、法律觀點，台北市：麥格羅希爾出版：
學富文化發行。
李瞻
1992 政府公共關係，台北市，理論與政策雜誌社：翰蘆總經銷。
李郁青
1996 媒介議題設定效果的第二面向─候選人形象設定效果研究，國立政治
大學新聞硏究所碩士學位論文。
金溥聰
1997 「報紙的形象設定效果研究：以民國八十三年台北市市長選舉為
例」，新聞學研究，第55期，頁203-223。
林鍾沂、林文斌譯(Owen E. Hughes〈1998, 2nd ed.〉原著)
1999 公共管理新論，台北：韋伯文化。
吳碧娥
2005 財經專業報紙失業議題的框架分析，國立政治大學新聞硏究所碩士
學位論文。
孫同文
2003 從威權政府到民主治理─台灣公共行政理論與實務之變遷，台北市：
元照。
桂宏誠
2003 「民主鞏固與政黨輪替」，國政分析，【線上資料】，財團法人國家
政策研究基金會，
http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/092/IA-B-092-
013.htm(瀏覽日期：2008/7/4)。
倪炎元
2003 再現的政治：台灣報紙媒體對「他者」建構的論述分析，台北：韋
伯。
翁興利
2004 政策規劃與行銷，台北：華泰。
許立一
2004 「第一線行政概說」，收錄於許立一等編著，第一線行政與民眾生
活，頁1-30，台北：空大。
許南雄
2004 行政學術語：兼釋「公共管理」詞彙，台北市：南鼎文化。
許道然、劉坤億、熊忠勇、黃建銘合譯(B. Guy Peters〈1996〉原著)
2000 政府未來的治理模式，台北：智勝文化。
郭中實、祝建華、陳懷林、俞旭、黃煜
2002 「無孔不入的媒體現實：直接和間接經驗對香港與廣州受眾對犯罪觀
念的影響」，新聞學研究，第71期，頁61-86。
陳陸輝
2003 「政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望」，台灣民主季刊，
第7卷第2期，頁149-188。
陳敦源
1998 「民意與公共管理」，公共管理，頁127-177。
陳敦源、孫文秀、呂季蓉
2006 「是誰告訴人民政府表現如何？政府績效、公共資訊與外電新聞的守
門人之研究」，發表於「2006年台灣公共行政暨事務系所聯合會
(TASPPA)年會」研討會，台灣公共行政暨事務系所聯合會主辦
(6.3)，台北。
歐振文
2003 形象修護策略之應用：國軍危機處理個案，世新大學傳播研究所碩士
論文。
張潤書
2002 行政學(修訂二版)，台北：三民。
張孝評
2003 轉型、鞏固與深化：台灣民主化的分析，國立政治大學中山人文社
會科學硏究所碩士學位論文。
張甄薇
1992 衝突性社會議題之新聞框架研究─以台灣政治反對運動為例
(1960-1991)，私立輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所論文。
湯濱等譯(卡特李普原著)
1991 有效公共關係，台北市：五南。
黃振嘉等譯(Wimmer, Roger D.原著)
2001 大眾媒體研究：導論，台北：學富文化。
黃榮護
1999 「政府公關與行銷」，收錄於黃榮護編著，公共管理，頁520-580，
台北：商鼎文化。
臧國仁
1998 新聞報導與真實建構：新聞框架的理論觀點，台北：國立政治大學傳
播學院。
1999 新聞媒體與消息來源：媒介框架與真實，台北：三民。
廖振榮
2003 我國警察形象管理制度之硏究，國立台北大學公共行政曁政策硏究
所碩士論文。
劉念夏
2002 「『民意調查與民意產製』：一個框架理論的觀點」，新聞學研究，
第72期，頁173-205。
劉坤億
2003 「英國柴契爾政府改革背景與理念的探索」，行政暨政策學報，第
36期，頁81-118。
劉毓玲譯(David Osborne and Ted Gaebler〈1992〉原著)
1993 新政府運動，台北：天下文化。
蔡良文
2003 人事行政學─論現行考敘制度(二版)，台北市，五南。
蔡美瑛
1995 「議題設定理論之發展─從領域遷徙、理論延展到理論整合」，新聞
學研究，第50期，頁97-124。
羅文輝
1991 精確新聞報導，台北市：正中
羅世宏
1994 後蔣經國時代的國家、大眾媒介與反對運動：國家認同議題的媒介
框架分析，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文資料
Abreu, Maria de Fatima
2000 “Fragments into the Construction of the Brazilian
Bureaucracy’s Image through the Cinema.” Public
Voices, 4(2): 28-38.
Choudhary, Mona
2000 “Bureaucrat-Bashing in the Galactic Senate: George
Lukas and Public Administration.” Public Voices, 4
(2): 54-60.
Cigler, Beverly A. and Heidi L. Neiwender
1991 “’Bureaucracy’ in the Introductory American
Government Textbook.”Public Administration Review,
51(5):442-450.
Coglianese, Cary and Margret Howard
1998 “Getting the Messages out: Regulatory Policy and
the Press.” Press/Politics, 3(3): 39-55.
Entman, R. M.
1993 “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured
Paradigm.” Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58.
Della Porta
2000 “Social Capital, Beliefs in Government, and
Political Corruption.” In Susan J. Pharr and
Robert D. Putnam(ed.), Disaffected Democracies:
What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? New
Jersey: Princeton University.
Denhardt, Robert B.
1995 Public administration : an action orientation(2nd
ed.). Fort Worth, Tex.: Harcourt Brace College
Publishers.
Finer, H.
1941 “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic
Government.” Reprinted in Peter Woll ed. (1966)
Public Administration and Policy: 247-275. NY:
Harper Torch Books.
Gabrielyan, Vatche
2000 “The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Screen
Bureaucrat.” Public Voices, 44(2):61-72.
Gamson, W. A.
1989 “News as Framing.“ American Behavioral Scientist,
33, 157-161.
Gates, Scott and Jeffery Hill
1995 “Democratic Accountability and Governmental
Innovation in the Use of Nonprofit Organizations.”
Policy Studies Review, 14, 137-148.
Ghanem, S.
1997 “Filling in the Tapestry: The Second Level of
Agenda-setting” In M. Mccombs, D. Shaw and D.
Weaver(ed.), Communication and Democracy. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gitlin, Todd
1980 The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the
Making and unmaking of the New Left. California,
University of California Press.
Goffman, Erving
1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of
Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press.
Goodnow, Frank Johnson
2003 Politics and administration: A study in government.
New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Goodsell, Charles T.
1994 The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration
Polemic(3rd ed.). N.J.: Chatham House.
Gouldner, Alvin W.
1954 Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Glencoe, Ill:
Free Press.
Gray, Andraw and Bill Jenkins
1995 “From Public Administration to Public Management:
Reassessing a Revolution?” Public Administration,
73(1): 75-99.
Greth, H. H. and C. Wright Mills (transl. and ed.)
1991 From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London:
Routledge.
Hall, Richard H.
1963 “The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical
Assessment.” The American Hardin, Russel
2000 “The Public Trust.” In Susan J. Pharr and Robert
D. Putnam(ed.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s
Troubling the Trilateral Countries? New Jersey:
Princeton University.
Heckscher, Charles
1994 “Defining the Post-Bureaucratic Type.” in C.
Heckscher and A. Donnellon (ed.), The Post-
Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on
Organization Change, pp.14-62. Thousand Oaks,
Calif: Sage.Holley, Lyn and Rebecca K. Lutte
2000 “Public Administration at the Movie..” Public
Voices, 4(2): 4-10.
Hood, Christopher
1991 “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public
Administration Review, 69(2): 3-19.
Kast, Fremont E. and James E. Rosenzweig
1985 Organization and Management: A System and
Contingency Approach(4th ed.). N.Y.: McGrew-Hill.
Kuklinski, James H.
1990 “Information and the Study of Politics,” In John
A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski(ed.),
Information and Democratic Process. Urbana:
University of Illinois Press.
Lee, Mordecai
1999 “Reporters and Bureaucrats: Public Relations
Counter-strategies by Public Administratiors in an
Era of Media Disinterest in Government.” Public
Relations Review, 25(4): 451-463.
2000 “Bureaucrat-Bashing in the Galactic Senate: George
Lukas and Public Administration.” Public Voices, 4
(2): 20-27.
2001 “The Image of the Government Flack: Movie
Depictions of Public Relations in Public
Administration.” Public Relation Review, 27: 297-
315.
Lichter, S. Robert, Linda S. Lichter, and Daniel Amundson
2000 “Government Goes Down the Tube: Image of
Governemnt in TV Entertainment, 1955-1998.”
Press/Politics, 5(2): 96-103.
Linz, Juan J. and Alfred C. Stepan
1995 Problems of Democratic Transistion and
Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and
Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, Maryland: John
Hopkins University Press.
Lippman, Walter
1922 Public Opinion(reprinted in 1956). N.Y.: Macmillan.
McCombs, Maxwell
2004 Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public
Opinion. Malden, Mass.: Polity.
McCombs, Maxwell and Amy Reynolds
2002 “News Influence on Our Pictures of the World.” in
Jennings Bryant and Dolf Zillmann (ed.), Media
Effects: Advances in Theory and Research(2nd
ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McCombs, Maxwell and D. L. Shaw
1972 “The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media.”
Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
McCombs, Maxwell and D. L. Shaw
1993 “The Evolution of Agenda-setting Research: Twenty-
five Years in the Marketplace.” Journal of
Communication, 43(2): 58-67.
McCurdy, Howard E.
1995 “Fiction and Imagination: How They Affect Public
Administration.” Public Administration Review,
55(6): 499-506.
Meier, K. J. and G. A. Krause
2003 “The Scientific Study of Bureaucracy: An
Overview.” in K. J. Meier and G. A. Krause (ed.),
Politics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in
the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy, pp.1-19. Univ.
of Michigan Press.
Merrill, J, C.
1962 “The Image of the United States in ten Mexican
Dailies.” Journalism Quarterly, 44, 563-570.
Merton, Robert K.
1940 “Bureaucratic Structure and Personality.” Social
Forces, 18(4): 560-568.
Merton, Robert K. et al (ed.)
1952 Reader in Bureaucracy. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Michels, Robert
1952 “Assimilation of the Discontented into the State
Bureaucracy.” in Robert K. Merton (ed.), Reader in
Bureaucracy, pp.140-143. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Negrine, Ralph
1996 The communication of Politics. London; Thousand
Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Nimmo, D. and R. L. Savage
1976 Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods, and
Findings. Santa Monica, California: Goodyear
Publishing Company Inc.
Niskanen, William A.
1971 “Bureaucracy and Representative Givernment,” in
The Locke Institute (ed.), Bureaucracy and Public
Economics, :pp.1-230. Aldershop, Hants, England;
Brookfield, Vt.: E. Elgar Pub..
1973 Bureaucracy: Servant or Master? Lessons from
America. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Parsons, Talcott (transl. and ed.)
1947 Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic
Organization. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Selznick, Philip
1943 “An Approach to a Theory of Bureaucracy.” American
Sociological Review, 8(1): 47-54.
1948 “Foundations of the Theory of Organization.”
American Sociological Review, 13(1): 25-35.
Sharfritz, Jay M.
1996 “Movie Review Invited.” Public Voice, 2(3): 129.
Sigel, R. S.
1964 “Effect of Partisanship on the perception of
Political Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly,
28, 483-496.
Stillman Ⅱ, Richard J.
1987 The American Bureaucracy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tankard, J. W.
2003 “The Empirical Approach to the Study of Media
Framing,” in Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy,
Jr., and August E. Grant (ed.), Framing Public
Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding
of the Social Life, pp.95-106. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Tuchman, G.
1978 Making News: A Study in the Construction of
Reality. NY: The Free Press.
Udy, Stanley H. Jr.
1959 “’Bureaucracy’ and “rationality’ in Weber’s
Organization Theory: An Empirical Study.” American
Sociological Review, 24(6): 791-795.
Villoria, Manuel
2000 “Bureaucracy on the Silver Screen: Images of the
Public Sector in the Spanish Movies.” Public
Voices, 4(2): 46-53.
Weaver, David H. et al.
1981 Media Agenda-setting in a Presidential Election.
NY: Praeger. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
93256020
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093256020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
