政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/83892

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 110182/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46639518 Online Users : 468

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/83892

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83892

Title:	海峽兩岸國（初）中歷史教科書政治意識型態之比較分析 A Comparative Analysis of Political Ideology： The Differences between History Textbook in Junior High School in Taiwan and Mainland China
Authors:	顏慶祥 Yen, Chin-Hsiang
Contributors:	黃炳煌黃國彥顏慶祥 Yen, Chin-Hsiang
Date:	1995
Issue Date:	2016-04-01 17:15:38 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討兩岸國（初）中歷史教科書之政治意識型態。為達成研究目的，乃採用文獻分析與內容分析法，並藉由理論探討和參酌相關實證研究，以建構適合分析兩岸歷史教科書政治意識型態之架構。根據所建立的分析架構，進行分析比較，並將結果供作有關單位、教科書編輯機構參考。 The results that emerged from this research were as follows:
Description:	博士國立政治大學教育學系
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000183
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[教育學系] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	182	View/Open

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

Loading...