English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89672/119493 (75%)
Visitors : 23944639      Online Users : 95
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/88590
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88590


    Title: 兒童摘取文章大意的能力
    The Ability of Summarizing Texts in Children
    Authors: 楊韻平
    Yang, Yun-Ping
    Contributors: 柯華葳
    Ko Hua-Wei
    楊韻平
    Yang Yun-Ping
    Keywords: 摘取大意能力
    摘要能力
    兒童
    文章難度
    Summarizing Text Ability
    Summarizing Ability
    Main ideas
    Children
    Text difficulty
    Date: 1993
    1993
    Issue Date: 2016-04-29 16:09:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要的目的是在探討年級、性別、文章程度對兒童摘取大意能力
    Reference: 李田英(民77 )學習成就之性別差異。 台北師院學報, 1 期, 119-13。 頁。
    吳敏而(1989) 摘取文章大意的教材教法。台南師院77 學年度國語文學術研討會宣讀。
    吳敏而(民79 )國語科大意教學怎能大意。 七十八年國民小學課程研究學術研討會專輯。 台灣省國民學校教師研習會出版。
    汪榮才(民68 )教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。 台南師專學報, 12期, 111-132頁。
    周何總主編(民76 )國語活用辭典。 台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    林國樑編著(民75 )語文教學研究(修訂七版) 。 台北:童年書店。
    黃昆輝(民68 )國民小學國語文教學績效之調查研究。 國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊, 21 輯,193-249 頁。
    張春興、陳李網(民66 )國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師,性別差異的關係。 教育心理學報, 10 期, 21-34 頁。
    陳誕(民71 )國小教師之性別與其教學成績及學生學業成績之性別差異的關係。 國科會補助研究論文。



    Asher, S.R., & Markell, R.A.(1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high-and-low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 680-687.
    Aulls, M.W.(1978). Developmental and remedial
    reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn
    and Bacon.
    Aulls, M.W.(1986). Actively teaching main idea
    skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main
    idea comprehension (PP.92-132). Newark. DE:
    International Reading Association.
    Bank, B.J., Briddle, B.J., & Good, T.L.(1980).
    Sex roles, classroom instruction and
    reading achievement. Journal of Educational
    Psychology, 72(2), 119-132.
    Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a
    direct instruction paradigm for teaching
    m a i n ide a corn pre hen s ion. ~R e a din g Res ear c h
    Quarterly, 20(1), 93-115.
    Baumann, J.F.(1986). The direct instruction of
    maln idea comprehension ability. In J. F.
    Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
    (PP.133-178). Newark, DE:International
    Reading Association.
    Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D.(1983). Macrorules for
    summarizing texts: The development of expertise.
    Journal of Verbal Learning and
    Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14.
    Brown, A.L., Day, J.D., & Jones, R.D. (1983).
    The development of plans for summarizing
    texts. Child Development, 54 (4), 968-979.
    Brown, A.L .. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the
    importance of structure units of prose passage:
    A problem of metacognitive development.
    Child Development, 48(1). 1-8.
    Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W. (1986). The
    confused world of main idea. In J. F.
    Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
    (PP.1-17). Newark. DE: International
    Reading Association.
    Duffelmeyer, F.A .. & Duffelmeyer, B.B. (1989,
    February). Are IRI passages suitable for
    assessing main idea comprehension? The Reading
    Teacher, PP.358-363.
    Hare, V.C., & Bingham, A.B.(1986). Teaching st-
    udents maln idea comprehension:Alternatives
    to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann
    (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
    (PP.179-194). Newark, DE: International
    Reading Association.
    Hare, V.C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K.M.
    (1989). Text effects on main idea compre hension.
    Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1),
    72-88.
    Herman, M.C.(1975). Male-female achievement in
    eight learning areas: A compilation of selected
    assessment results. (Eric ED 072461)
    Hidi, S., & Anderson, V.(1986). Producing written
    summaries: Task demands, cognitive
    operations, and implication for instruction.
    Review of Educational Research, 56
    (4), 473-493.
    Johnson, N.S. (1983). What do you do if yor
    can't tell the whole story? The development
    of summarization skills. In K.E. Nelson
    (Ed.), Children's Language (Vol.4, PP.315-
    381) .
    Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a
    model of text comprehension and production.
    Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
    Lee, T.T.(李田英)(1987). The relationships of
    achievement, instruction. and family background
    to elementary school science achievement
    in the Republic of China. Unpublished
    doctoral dissertation. Ohio State
    University. (Eric ED 282724)
    Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A.M., & Engel, M.
    (1979). Learning what's taught: Sex differences
    in instruction. Journal of Educati-
    0nal Psychology, 2l(4) , 432-439.
    Lewis, J., & Hoover. H.D. (1983). Sex differences
    on standardized academic achievement
    text: A longitudinal study. Paper presented
    at the annual meeting of the American Educational
    Research Association. (Eric ED
    233077)
    Meyer, B.J.F.(1975). The organization of prose
    and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
    Meyer, B.J.F.(1985). Prose analysis: Purposes,
    procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton
    & J.B. Black(Eds.), Understanding expository
    text (PP.11-64, 269-304). Hillsdale, NJ:La
    wrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Otto, W., Barrett, T.C., & Koenke, K. (1969).
    Assessment of children's statements of the
    main idea in reading. In J.A. Figurel(Ed.),
    Reading and realism (PP.692-697). Newark,
    DE: International Reading Association.
    Pearson, P.O., & Johnson, D.O. (1978). Teaching
    reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart
    & Winston.
    Stahl. S.A., Jacobson, M.G., Davis, C.E .. & Davis,
    R.L.(1989). Prior Knowledge and difficult
    vocabulary in the comprehension of
    unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly,
    24(1),27-43.
    Will iams, J.P.(1984). Categorization, macrostructure,
    and finding the main idea. Journal
    of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 874-879.
    Williams, J.P.(1986). Research and instructional
    development on main idea skills. In J.F.
    Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehens
    ion (P P . 1 3 3 - 1 7 8). New ark, 0 E: I n t ern a t i 0 n-a 1
    .Reading Association.
    Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & deCani, J.S.(l
    984). Constructing macrostructure for expo-
    sitory text. Journal of Educational Psychology,
    76(6), 1065 - 1075.
    Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & Ganger, S.
    (1981). Text va ri at ions at the 1 evel of the
    individual sentence and the comprehension
    of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 73(6), 851-865.
    Williams, M., & stevens, V.M.R.(1972). Unders tanding
    paragraph structure. Journal of
    Reading, 15(7), 513-516.
    Winograd, P.N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in
    summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly,
    19(4), 404-425.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    775214
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003799
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML74View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback