English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48079989      Online Users : 933
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/112240
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112240


    Title: 基於知識翻新原則的教學研究之系統回顧
    A systematic review of pedagogical design and implementation based on knowledge building principles
    Authors: 余英孚
    Yee, Eng Fu
    Contributors: 洪煌堯
    Hong, Huang Yao
    余英孚
    Yee, Eng Fu
    Keywords: 教學設計
    知識翻新
    系統回顧
    Pedagogical design
    Knowledge building
    Systematic review method
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-28 11:55:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的在針對基於知識翻新原則的教學研究進行系統回顧。本研究的分析對象為Scopus資料庫中,自2001年至2016年間,所蒐集之56篇知識翻新研究。本研究採多階層之編碼流程,再根據研究問題構思出不同層面之編碼類別,以進行描述統計分析。本研究並以Kappa係數特別針對學習成效編碼項目計算編碼者間信度。結果顯示在整個編碼過程中編碼者間達成之協議良好(k = 0.8)。本研究基於描述性統計分析研究,研究結果發現知識翻新研究起源於西方,但近16年來,大部分的知識翻新研究則多實施於東方國家。所有知識翻新研究中,十二年基礎教育學生於自然科學領域中之知識翻新研究較多。東方國家所進行的研究結果中發現,研究對象有從學習者社群的研究轉移至教師社群的研究的趨勢。換言之,東方國家的知識翻新研究多以教師為研究對象。研究設計方面,個案研究是知識翻新研究中最常被採用的研究設計方式,而最常採用的分析方法則是混合分析方法。知識翻新研究中所使用之線上學習平台則以知識論壇(knowledge forum)為大宗。知識翻新原則是知識翻新研究的主要基礎,而多研究的重心則偏重在與「想法」相關的知識翻新原則上。本研究之研究結果也發現社交學習成效較常在知識翻新研究中被檢測。其中,知識論壇之貼文與回文互動明顯多於以統整不同想法之貼文互動。
    The main purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of research that contains pedagogical design and implementation based on knowledge building principles (KBPs). This study includes 56 knowledge building (KB) studies selected from the Scopus database between 2001 and 2016. Multi-levels of coding procedures were employed in categorizing different analysis dimensions in order to answer the research questions. Particularly, the coding scheme regarding the dimension of the learning outcomes employed a procedure to compute the inter-coder reliability using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (k) formula with the coefficient k = 0.8.Findings mainly based on descriptive analysis revealed that KB studies are more frequently conducted in Eastern countries than Western countries. Most of the KB studies that involved students from K-12 levels were conducted in the natural science domain. In particular, it was found that KB studies conducted in the Eastern countries are shifting their study focus from learner communities to teacher communities. Case study was found to be the preferred research design in most KB studies over the past 16 years, and regarding analysis, mixed methods analysis is the more popular analysis method.Moreover, more than one-half of the KB studies used Knowledge Forum (KF) as the main online learning platform.Of all KBPs, idea-related KBPs are most likely to be employed in the KB studies. Regarding learning outcomes, about one-half of studies fall in the social studies domain. Among these social learning outcomes, basic interaction on KF activities (build notes and post notes) was found more than higher-order interaction on KF activities (synthesize notes).
    Reference: REFERENCES

    Andale (2017).Cohen’s Kappa Statistic. Retrieved from http://www.statisticshowto.com/cohens-kappa-statistic/
    Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21-23.
    Boland, A., Cherry, M. G., & Dickson, R. (Eds.) (2014). Doing a systematic review: A student’s guide. London: SAGE.
    Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294-320. Retrieved from https://sociology.dartmouth.edu/sites/sociology.dartmouth.edu/files/coding_in_depth_semi.pdf
    Cacciamani, S., Cesareni, D., Martini, F., Ferrini, T., & Fujita, N. (2012). Influence of participation, facilitator styles, and metacognitive reflection on knowledge building in online university courses. Computers and Education, 58(3), 874-884. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.019
    Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and KB in a blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 9-39. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9224-0
    Cesareni, D., Martini, F., & Mancini, I. (2011). Building a community among teachers, researchers and university students. A blended approach to training. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 625-646. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9126-8
    Chai, C. S., & Tan, S. C. (2011). Two exploratory studies of the relationships between teachers` epistemic beliefs and their online interactions. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 21(1), 13-24. doi:10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.039691
    Chai, C. S., & Tan, S. C. (2009). Professional development of teachers for computer-supported collaborative learning: a knowledge-building approach. Teachers College Record, 111(5), 1296-1327.
    Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 250-261.
    Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Students` views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1445-1457. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.003
    Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266-288. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1175306
    Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge?building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345-366. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9225-z
    Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2011). Active classroom participation in a group scribbles primary science classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 676-686. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01082.x
    Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & De Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers and Education, 75, 53-64. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015
    Egger, M., Dickersin, K., & Smith, G. D. (2008). Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227989644
    Erkunt, H. (2010). Emergence of epistemic agency in college level educational technology course for pre-service teachers engaged in CSCL. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 38-51.
    Gilbert, N. J., & Driscoll, M. P. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 59-79.
    Goh, A., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Facilitating students` development of their views on nature of science: A knowledge building approach. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 521-530. doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0050-0
    Green, S. (2005). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Singapore Medical Journal, 46(6), 270-274.
    Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. Retrieved from http://eprints2008.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/25206/1/6_P27-36.pdf
    Hong, H. Y., Chen, B., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Exploring the development of college students`epistemic views during their knowledge building activities. Computers and Education, 98, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.005
    Hong, H. Y., & Chiu, C. H. (2016). Understanding how students perceive the role of ideas for their knowledge work in a knowledge-building environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 32-46.
    Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers and Education, 89, 91-102. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.012
    Hong, H. Y., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). College students constructing collective knowledge of natural science history in a collaborative knowledge building community. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 549-561. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9546-8
    Hong, H. Y., Chang, Y. H., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Fostering a collaborative and creative climate in a college class through idea-centered knowledge-building. Instructional Science, 42(3), 389-407. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9289-y
    Hong, H. Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment. Computers and Education, 71, 279-288. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.009
    Hong, H. Y. (2014). Exploring college students` perceptions of learning and online performance in a knowledge building environment. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 511-522. doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0125-6
    Hong, H. Y., Chen, F. C., Chai, C. S., & Chan, W. C. (2011). Teacher-education students` views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science, 39(4), 467-482. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9143-4
    Hong, H. Y., & Lin, S. P. (2010). Teacher-education students` epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99-110.
    Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 1, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://gerrystahl.net/proceedings/icls2008/papers/paper278.pdf
    International Labour Organization (n.d.). Regions and countries. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.ilo.org/global/regions/lang--en/index.htm
    International Standard Classification of Education (2011). ISCED coding schema. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdf
    Internet World Stats (n.d.). World regions. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/list1.htm
    Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611. Retrieved May 16, 2017, from http://www.pm.lth.se/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Jick_1979__Mixing_qualitative_and_quantitative_methods_-_Triangulation_in_action.pdf
    Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~weippl/systemicReviewsSoftwareEngineering.pdf
    Lai, M., & Law, N. (2013). Questioning and the quality of knowledge constructed in a CSCL context: A study on two grade-levels of students. Instructional Science, 41(3), 597-620. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9246-1
    Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 123-144. doi:10.2190/GW42-575W-Q301-1765
    Lin, C. Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2016). Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learning for small-group projects and whole-class collaborative KB. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 529-547. doi:10.1111/jcal.12140
    Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    Lossman, H., & So, H. J. (2010). Toward pervasive knowledge building discourse: Analyzing online and offline discourses of primary science learning in Singapore. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 121-129. doi:10.1007/s12564-009-9063-7
    Majumder, K. (2015, April 29). A young researcher’s guide to a systematic review. Retrieved from http://www.editage.com/insights/a-young-researchers-guide-to-a-systematic-review
    Markauskaite, L., & Sutherland, L. M. (2008). Exploring individual and collaborative dimensions of knowledge building in an online learning community of practice. Informatics in Education, 7(1), 105-126.
    Mirabella, D. (2016, November 30). Quora: Are Turkey and Iran considered Western countries or Eastern? Retrieved from https://www.quora.com/Are-Turkey-and-Iran-considered-Western-countries-or-Eastern
    Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2006). Knowledge building in mathematics: Supporting collaborative learning in pattern problems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 441-465. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9003-z
    Nason, R., Chalmers, C., & Yeh, A. (2012). Facilitating growth in prospective teachers` knowledge: Teaching geometry in primary schools. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(3), 227-249. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9209-0
    National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, J. W. Pellegrino and M. L. Hilton, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from http://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Education_for_Life_and_Work.pdf
    Ng, E., & Bereiter, C. (1991).Three levels of goal orientation in learning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 1(3&4), 243-271.
    One World Nations Online (n.d.). Countries and regions of the world. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/countries_of_the_world.htm
    Oshima, J., & Oshima, R. (2007) CSCL-based pre-service teacher program as knowledge building. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 230, 187-194.
    Oshima, J., Oshima, R., Murayama, I., Inagaki, S., Takenaka, M., Yamamoto, T., Yamaguchi, E., & Nakayama, H. (2006). Knowledge-building activity structures in Japanese elementary science pedagogy. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 229-246. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-8995-8
    Pelletier, J., Reeve, R., & Halewood, C. (2006). Young children`s knowledge building and literacy development through Knowledge Forum. Early Education and Development, 17(3), 323-346. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1703_2
    Popper, K. R. (1978). Three worlds: The tanner lectures on human values. Retrieved from http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf
    Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309-336. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x
    Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1-16. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (EJ910456)
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.97-118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/fulltext/2006_KBTheory.pdf
    Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp.183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Retrieved from http://www.ikit.org/fulltext/CSILE_KF.pdf
    Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Smith, B. (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp.67-98). Chicago: Open Court. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/fulltext/inpressCollectiveCog.pdf
    Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984).Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8, 173-190. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a895/bbb467b1df55b0b238bddbff04f125ee1971.pdf
    Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109-136. doi:10.1007/s10798-008-9066-4
    Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Raunio, A. M., Raami, A., Muukkonen, H., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Computer support for collaborative designing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(2), 181-202. doi:10.1023/A:1011277030755
    So, H. J., Seah, L. H., & Toh-Heng, H. L. (2010). Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners: Impacts and design challenges. Computers and Education, 54(2), 479-490. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.031
    Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 147-171. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9082-5
    Teplovs, C., Donoahue, Z., Scardamalia, M., & Philip, D. (2007). Tools for concurrent, embedded, and transformative assessment of KB processes and progress. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. Retrieved from http://chris.ikit.org/cscl2007-339final2.pdf
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (n.d.). Country by region. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/data-organization/countries-by-regions#Table2
    UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, n.d.). UNESCO regions. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/worldwide/regions-and-countries/
    Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57-59. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/
    van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259-287. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5
    van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220.
    van Aalst, J., & Hill, C. M. (2006). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing knowledge building. Learning Environments Research, 9(1), 23-44.doi:10.1007/s10984-005-9000-6
    van Aalst, J., & Cummings, M. (2006). Implementing knowledge building: Analysis of a face?to?face discussion by grade?four students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(4), 351-368. doi:10.1080/14926150609556710
    Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-363. Retrieved from http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/courses/CS6998/Interrater_agreement.Kappa_statistic.pdf
    Worldatlas (n.d.). Countries listed by continent. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.worldatlas.com/cntycont.htm
    Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C. K. K., & Tian, W. (2016). Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 281-311. doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9239-1
    Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. (2012). Exploring patterns of interaction in Knowledge Forum databases using Knowledge Connections Analyzer (KCA). Retrieved from http://ikit.org/SummerInstitute2012/Papers/3023-Yang-Final.pdf
    Yapp, M. E., & Dewdney, J. C. (2017, April 17). Encyclopadia Britannica: Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/place/Turkey
    Yucel, U. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers and Education, 97, 31-48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.015
    Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429-452. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9135-4
    Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
    Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge society network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Educational Theory and Practice Faculty Scholarship, 4, 1-29. Retrieved from http://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=etap_fac_scholar
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44. doi:10.1080/10508400802581676
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117-145. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9019-0
    Zhao, K., & Chan, C. K. K. (2014). Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(1), 63-95. doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9188-x
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    104152015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1041520151
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    015101.pdf2831KbAdobe PDF2205View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback