English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94986/125531 (76%)
Visitors : 31016618      Online Users : 449
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/124978
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124978


    Title: 知識翻新活動融入英語課程對國中生閱讀理解及口說能力之影響
    Effects of knowledge building activities on junior high school students’ reading comprehension and English speaking performance
    Authors: 陳宜美
    Chen, Yi-Mei
    Contributors: 洪煌堯
    Hong, Huang-Yao
    陳宜美
    Chen, Yi-Mei
    Keywords: 知識翻新
    英語教學
    閱讀理解
    學習滿意度
    教學反思
    knowledge building
    English teaching
    reading comprehension
    learning satisfaction
    teaching reflection
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-08-07 16:56:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討於英語課程中進行「知識翻新活動」,對學生英文閱讀、英文口說學習、以及英文學習態度之影響。研究問題包括:(1) 知識翻新活動對學生閱讀理解能力之表現影響情形為何? (2) 知識翻新活動對學生的口說表現影響情形為何? (3) 學生於知識論壇的知識翻新活動情形為何? (4) 經過知識翻新活動後,學生對於課程之滿意度為何? 以及(5) 以知識翻新原則進行的教學反思,對教師教學信念與教學模式的改變情形為何?

    本研究採行動研究法,研究對象為臺北市某國中的國三學生。研究分為兩階段,兩階段的研究對象分別為不同班級的學生,但人數皆為三十一人。教學活動以每組2至3人方式進行,活動過程中則使用平板電腦。本研究兩階段皆利用四週、共十六堂課之上課時間,其中每堂課皆為四十五分鐘。二階段在教學方法上基本都相同,但第二階段有新增口說訓練且在教學上另外輔以鷹架協助學生學習,此外,也分別於研究前後額外實施學習滿意度問卷調查。

    根據研究問題,本研究產生之重要結果如下:(1) 第一階段學生在閱讀測驗前後測差異上未達到統計上的顯著,然第二階段效果上則有顯著進步,主要原因應是研究者在進行教學反思後,於教學設計中所使用之鷹架能有效協助學生學習。(2) 經過知識翻新活動後,學生在第二階段之英文口說成績亦有達到顯著進步。透過質性訪談,學生皆反應使用平板電腦進行課堂所設計的學習活動能增加口說信心。(3) 知識翻新平台的使用量,也因為教學反思後的教學策略改變,使學生在第二階段的表現優於第一階段。(4) 「學習滿意度」問卷調查中則發現,近九成學生在努力構面上感到滿意;有八成左右的學生覺得知識翻新融入英語教學,使他們在英文學習上較不會感到焦慮。(5) 根據知識翻新十二項原則所設計的教學省思,也讓研究者於第二階段更瞭解這些原則,使得學生在閱讀理解、口說能力測驗的成果上皆達到顯著進步。

    根據上述研究結果,建議在應用知識翻新理論融入英語教學環境上,可以提供較自由與富彈性之學習環境、輔以適合的鷹架支持學生學習動機,以強化學生的學習興趣、降低學習壓力,並進而改善學習成效。
    This study investigated how students improved their reading ability, speaking ability, and other related learning performance after participating in knowledge building (KB) activities in two English classes. The research questions are as follows: (1) How do KB activities influence students’ reading comprehension? (2) How do KB activities affect students’ speaking ability? (3) How active are students to interact with each other on the online discussion forum? (4) How satisfied are the students after completing the English classes? And (5) how did the teacher change her teaching faith in general?

    The study design was based on action research, with the participants being ninth-grade students in one junior high school in Taipei. There were two phases in the research. Participants in these two phases were both 31 students (but different persons). Both of the two phases lasted for 4 weeks, with 4 classes per week (i.e., totally 16 classes). In the phase two, the instructional design was revised to add additional speaking training with the aids of scaffolding questions and instructions. Pre and pro satisfaction surveys were also conducted in the two phases.

    According to the research questions, the main findings were shown below: (1) Students in phase one did not have significant improvement in their reading comprehension but students in phase two did improve significantly in their reading comprehension. The main reason was likely to be the teachers’ instructional scaffolds. (2) The speaking ability of the students in phase two improved significantly. (3) Students in phase two used the online KB forum more frequently than in phase one. (4) Based on the satisfaction survey, it was found that 90% of students were satisfied with their English learning in class mainly because of the KB activities. (5) The teacher-as-researcher understood these principles better through her own teaching reflection; and hence was able to help the students improve in their reading and speaking skills.
    Reference: 參考文獻

    王博賢(2010)。知識翻新教學對小學生科學探究活動與科學合作概念之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    天下雜誌(2010)。培育未來夢想家,點亮未來。民 99 年 5 月 31 日,取自http://www.cw.com.tw/event/ad/futureschool/page01.htm
    王全世(2000)。資訊科技融入教學的意義與內涵。資訊教育雜誌。
    王靜華 (2016)。知識翻新對國小四年級學生閱讀理解和寫作表現之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,臺北市。
    朱致慧 (2006)。國民中學藝術與人文領域音樂教師教學反思之個案研究。國立台北教育大學音樂教育學系碩士論文,臺北市。
    全民英檢網。中級寫作能力測驗分數說明。LTTC財團法人語言訓練測驗中心。https://www.gept.org.tw/index.asp
    吳炎鈴 (2018)。以全英語溝通教學提升國民小學四年級學生英語口說能力之行動研究。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
    林倍伊 (2015)。小組知識翻新活動中的設計思考與創造力表現:以個案研究為例。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,臺北市。
    林奎宇(2011)。知識翻新學習環境量表之編製。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林淑娟 (2013)。國小一年級國語領域結構取向的聽讀說寫整合教學促進寫作之研究。國立東華大學課程設計與潛能開發學系碩士論文,花蓮縣。
    馬芳婷(1989)。社教機構短期研習班教師教學行為與學生學習滿意度之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    陳木金、許瑋珊(2012)。從PISA閱讀評量的國際比較探討。教師天地,181,6-20。 
    陳朱祥 (2017)。高中體育實習教師教學反思與專業成長之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系碩士論文,臺北市。
    陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。臺北:心理。
    葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學-過去、現在與未來。臺北:心理。
    張宇慧(2010)。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響。國立政治大學教育系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
    張春興(1997)。張氏心理辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
    張春興(2004)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐(修訂版)。臺北:東華書局。
    黃瑞凌(2018)。以英語閱讀理解策略提升國中學生系統思考與解決問題素養之行動研究。私立中原大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
    黃俐雯 (2017)。結合故事演說與鷹架教學來提高學生學習動機與閱讀理解及口說能力。臺南科技大學應用英語系碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    歐玫琴 (2016)。應用心智圖教學策略於國小二年級學生閱讀理解之行動研究。私立大葉大學資訊管理學系碩士班,彰化縣。
    魏明堂(2002)。高職教師對國中生職業試探與輔導活動實施工作滿意度研究。國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。



    Ammer, J. J. (1998). Peer evaluation model for enhancing writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14(3), 263-276.

    Beaudoin, M. -N. & Taylor, M. (2004). Creating A Positive School Culture: How principals and teachers can solve problems together. CA: Corwin press.

    Ensor, J., Cottam, A., & Band, C. (2001). Fostering Knowledge management through the
    creative work environment: a portable model from the advertising industry. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 147-155
.
    Jyun Long, Chen. (2010). A study on teacher professional growth under the teacher
    professional development evaluation. Teacher evaluation, 66,189-207.
    Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon. Khaiyali, A. (2014). Exploring the use of children’s picture books to explicitly teach reading
    comprehension strategies in Libyan EFL classrooms. (Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University). Retrieved from https://research.wsulibs.wsu.edu:8443/xmlui/handle/2376/5118
    MacCrimmon, K. R. & C. Wagner (1994). Stimulating Ideas through Creativity Software. Management Science, 40 (11), 1514-1532.
    Martin, C.L.(1988). Enhancing children’s satisfaction and participation: Using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms. The physical Educator, 45(4), 196-209.
    Norman, D. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (1996). Learner-centered education. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 24-27.
    Paris, S. G., Hamilton, E. E. (2009). The development of children’s reading comprehension. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (p. 32-53). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
    Benton, S. L., & Kiewra, K. A. (1987). The assessment of cognitive factors in academic abilities. In R. R. Ronning, J. A. Glover, J. C. Conoley, & J. C. Witt (Eds.), The influence of cognitive psychology on testing (pp. 145-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Cheng Chiung-Mei. (2018). A Thesis
Submitted to Graduate Institute of Education College of Humanities and Social Sciences ProvidenceUniversity
in partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education.
    Ertem, I. S. (2009). Investigating the effects of electronic CD-ROM storybooks and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension of fourth grade struggling readers. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida). Retrieved from http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0024076/ertem_i.pdf
    Fujita-Stank, P.J. & Thompson, J.A.(1994). The effects of motivation and classroom
    environment on the satisfaction of noncredit continuing education student. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED :3730646)
    Harris, T. L.& Hodges, R. E. (Eds.). (1981). A dictionary of reading and related terms [Special section] International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4 (4), 602.
    Hong, H. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613.
    Knowles, M. S.(1970), Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.
    Louise Aronson (2010). Twelve tips for teaching reflection at all levels of medical education. Medical Teacher, 33(3), 200-205.
    Pretorius, E. J. (2002). Reading ability and academic performance in South Africa: Are we fiddling while Rome is burning?. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Southern Africa, 33(1), 169-196.
    Scardamalia, M. (1999). Moving ideas to the center. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Wisdom & Wizardry: Celebrating the pioneers of online education (pp. 14-15). Vancouver, BC: Telelearning, Inc.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. Distefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children committee on the prevention of reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
    Tough, A.(1978). The major learning efforts: recent research and future directions. Adult Education, 28(4), 250-265.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    105152004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105152004
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900369
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200401.pdf3073KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback