English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46345361      Online Users : 536
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146583


    Title: 韓中字幕翻譯的簡化策略分析—以《與神同行》及其續作文本與譯者訪談為視角
    Analysis of Simplification Strategies in Korean-Chinese Subtitling: A Perspective from the Texts of ";Along with the Gods";and Its Sequels and In-depth Interviews with Translators
    Authors: 黃鏡芸
    Huang, Jing-Yun
    Contributors: 林侑毅
    黃鏡芸
    Huang, Jing-Yun
    Keywords: 韓中字幕翻譯
    韓中電影翻譯
    字幕翻譯簡化策略
    譯者深度訪談
    韓語翻譯教育
    Korean-Mandarin translation
    Korean-Mandarin subtitling
    Simplification strategies in subtitling
    In-depth interview
    Korean translation education
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 14:07:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在全球化發展下,韓國影視作品快速傳播之世界各地,台灣亦自1990年代起引進韓國影視作品,至今已有多部韓國戲劇與電影在台廣受觀眾喜愛,韓國影視作品因而在台灣的外國影視市場佔有一席地位。隨著翻譯的重要性日益提升,以及韓國影視作品在台灣的興盛發展,使得以中文與韓文為主軸的字幕翻譯相關研究,成為重要的研究課題。故本研究旨在探究韓國電影中文字幕的簡化現象,從理論與實務分析韓中字幕翻譯的簡化策略,以期能促進韓中字幕翻譯教學與譯者培養的發展。
    本研究首先採用文獻分析法,梳理口筆譯以及字幕翻譯簡化策略相關研究,綜合西方早期研究,以及台韓以西方研究為基礎分析之字幕翻譯簡化策略,觀察到字幕翻譯的簡化策略包含語彙、語法、語意以及內容等多個面向。故本研究以上述發現為基礎,分析在台票房甚佳,較具代表性之電影《與神同行》及其續作,以上述兩部作品的韓語對白與中文字幕為文本,將韓中字幕翻譯簡化策略分為語言簡化、語意簡化以及內容簡化三大項,其中語言簡化又分為包含省略填充詞與感歎詞、省略稱謂語之語彙簡化,與包含句型轉換、省略連接詞以及配合目標語改變來源語範疇的語法簡化;語意簡化係指上位詞與近義詞的使用;內容簡化則指訊息簡縮、訊息省略與訊息刪除,其中訊息省略包含重複語句與重複語意的省略,訊息刪除則包含修飾語與次要訊息的刪除。
    研究結果發現在語言簡化層面,首先語彙簡化主要聚焦於將不具實質語意、可透過影像的其他頻道補足,以及不符合目標語語言習慣之語彙省略或以其他語彙替代;語法簡化則主要將不符合目標語語言習慣之語法,透過句型的改寫與省略技法來達成簡化。語意簡化主要起因於字幕的訊息量過多,因而透過上位詞與近義詞的使用來降低訊息難度,進而達到簡化。內容簡化則聚焦於將具語意重疊性,以及可透過語境或影像其他頻道補足之訊息濃縮、省略或刪除,以減少字幕的冗言贅詞,進而達到簡化。
    本研究進一步以上述理論層面之韓中字幕翻譯簡化策略為基礎,深度訪談翻譯《與神同行》及其續作之譯者,以探究實務層面之韓中字幕翻譯簡化策略。研究結果發現在語言簡化層面,語彙簡化係為降低訊息對觀眾觀影的干擾,以及避免兩國語言差異造成之翻譯腔;語法簡化則主要起因於字幕的線形特性,以及避免兩國語言差異造成之翻譯腔。語意簡化係為了降低字數以及消弭文化差異。內容簡化則係為了降低字幕字數,以及避免重複訊息的譯出。
    綜合上述理論與實務之韓中字幕翻譯簡化策略,本研究進一步得出以下四項結論:1. 理論與實務皆重視提升譯文可讀性帶來之字幕簡化;2. 理論與實務皆強調減少譯出影像多重符號性造成之重複訊息;3. 實務較重視字數的控制;4. 實務較不傾向透過訊息的流失來簡化譯文。
    本研究旨在從理論與實務分析韓中字幕翻譯的簡化策略,以探究簡化策略的運用對字幕翻譯帶來的影響,並透過與譯者的訪談,探討理論與實務的相關性,進而探尋簡化策略的理論該如何應用於實務翻譯中。本研究期待能起到拋磚引玉的作用,促進台灣韓中字幕翻譯相關研究的發展。
    Since the 1990s, Taiwanese audiences have consistently shown a strong appreciation for Korean dramas and movies, resulting in their widespread popularity in the country. Consequently, Korean film and television productions have acquired a notable foothold within Taiwan`s international film and television industry. The significance of translation has been increasingly recognized, particularly in light of the flourishing Korean film and television industry in Taiwan. Consequently, scholarly attention has turned towards subtitle translation, specifically in the context of Mandarin and Korean languages. This research area has emerged as a crucial and noteworthy academic pursuit. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to investigate the phenomenon of simplification observed in subtitling, considering both theoretical and practical aspects. The primary objective was to enhance the advancement of Korean-to-Mandarin subtitling education and the training of translators.
    This study has examined the commercial success and representative nature of the films "Along with the Gods" and its sequel in the Taiwanese box office. The corpus used in this study has consisted of the Korean dialogues and their corresponding Mandarin subtitles extracted from two films. This study has initially employed a literature analysis methodology to examine relevant studies on the simplification of interpretation, translation, and subtitling. The findings of the observation indicate that strategies for the simplification of subtitling encompass multiple dimensions, such as linguistic simplification, semantic simplification, and content simplification. Linguistic simplification encompasses the exclusion of fillers and interjections, as well as the omission of honorifics and titles. Additionally, it encompasses the manipulation of sentence structures, the exclusion of conjunctions, and the modification of the source language`s scope to align with the target language through the simplification of grammar. Semantic simplification involves the utilization of superordinate terms and synonyms. Content simplification involves condensing, omitting, and deleting messages. Omission refers to the exclusion of redundant sentences and redundant meaning, while deletion involves removing modifiers and secondary information.
    The research findings have indicated that vocabulary simplification primarily involves the omission of terms that lack substantive meaning and can be supplemented visually, as well as the omission or substitution of vocabulary that does not adhere to the language norms of the target language. In contrast, the process of structural simplification primarily entails the modification of sentence structures and the utilization of omission strategies to streamline grammatical elements that deviate from the linguistic conventions of the intended language. The phenomenon of semantic simplification primarily arises due to an overabundance of information contained within subtitles. Consequently, the utilization of superordinate terms and synonyms is employed to mitigate the intricacy of the data, thereby facilitating its simplification. The process of content simplification involves reducing, excluding, or removing messages that contain unnecessary repetition or can be understood through context or visual channels. The objective of this reduction is to minimize redundant and repetitive language in subtitles, thereby accomplishing simplification.
    This study has conducted in-depth interviews with translators of "Along with the Gods" and its sequels, building upon the theoretical framework mentioned earlier. The research findings have indicated that vocabulary simplification is employed to minimize interference with the audience`s viewing experience and mitigate the potential for translationese resulting from linguistic disparities between the two nations. In contrast, the process of structural simplification is predominantly driven by the linear structure of subtitles and seeks to mitigate the potential translationese that may arise from linguistic disparities between the source and target languages. Semantic simplification is utilized as a strategy to decrease word count and mitigate cultural disparities. The process of content simplification aims to minimize the quantity of subheadings and eliminate the translation of unnecessary or repetitive information.
    Based on the integration of the aforementioned theoretical and practical strategies for the simplification of Korean-to-Mandarin subtitling, this research further derives the following four conclusions: 1. Both theoretical and practical approaches highlight the importance of simplifying subtitles in order to improve the readability of text; 2. Both theoretical and practical approaches prioritize the reduction of message repetition resulting from the presence of multiplicity of channels; 3. In practical application, there is a greater emphasis on the regulation of word count: 4. In practical application, there exists a diminished inclination to streamline the translation process at the expense of preserving the fluidity of conveyed information.
    Reference: 【中】專書
    中國社會科學院語言研究所詞典編輯室,2012,《現代漢語詞典》第六版,北京,商務印書館。
    陳新雄・竺家寧・姚榮松・羅肇錦・孔仲溫・吳聖雄編著,2011,《語言學辭典》,台北,三民書局。
    傑里米·芒迪(Jeremy Monday)著・李德鳳編譯,2007,《翻譯學導論-理論與實踐》,香港,中文大學出版社。
    楊承淑,2019,《口譯的訊息處理過程研究》,台北,元華文創。
    廖柏森・歐冠宇・李亭穎・吳碩禹・陳雅齡・張思婷・游懿萱・劉宜霖,2013,《英中筆譯 1: 基礎翻譯理論與技巧》,新北,眾文圖書。
    廖柏森・歐冠宇・李亭穎・吳碩禹・陳雅齡・張思婷・游懿萱・劉宜霖,2013,《英中筆譯2:各類文體翻譯實務》,新北,眾文圖書。
    劉宓慶,1997,《文體與翻譯》,台北,書林書店。
    劉敏華,2008,《逐步口譯與筆記》,台北,書林出版有限公司。
    諸彥含,2019,《社會科學研究方法》,台北,崧燁文化。

    【中】期刊論文
    李運興,2001,〈字幕翻譯的策略〉,《中國翻譯》,第22卷 第4期,中國翻譯工作者協會,頁38-40。
    林慶隆・劉欣宜・吳培若・丁彥平,2011,〈臺灣翻譯發展相關議題之探討〉,《編譯論叢》,第4卷 第2期,國家教育研究院,頁181-200。
    高煥麗,2012,〈從語境觀點探討字幕翻譯的理解:以連接詞的縮減為例〉,《編譯論叢》,第5卷 第2期,國家教育研究院,頁153-200。
    郭秋雯,2011,〈韓流對臺灣的影響及其因應對策〉,《Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies》 第18期,政治大學國際事務學院WTO研究中心,頁127-170。
    楊承淑,2008,〈同步口譯與字幕翻譯之簡化原則〉,《編譯論叢》,第8卷 第1期,國家教育研究院,頁43-69。
    ___,2005,〈同步口譯的簡化類型與規律〉,《國立編譯館館刊》第33卷 第1期,頁20-39。

    【中】學位論文
    林培瑄,2016,《字幕翻譯簡化策略:以情境喜劇《追夢女孩》為例》,碩士論文,長榮大學翻譯學系碩士班。
    孫筱函,2016,《字幕翻譯簡化策略:以影集《新世紀福爾摩斯》為例》,碩士論文,長榮大學翻譯學系碩士班。
    張懿萱,2011,《同步口譯與字幕翻譯簡化策略之研究》,碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學翻譯研究所。
    曾琮淇,2013,《字幕翻譯簡化策略:以影集〈醜女貝蒂〉為例》,碩士論文,長榮大學翻譯學系碩士班。

    【中】網路資料
    文化內容策進院,2022,《2021年臺灣文化內容消費趨勢調查計畫》。
    車庫娛樂,2017,《《屍速列車》一天破紀錄! 首日全台票房近2300萬 衝破韓片在台13年票房冠軍紀錄 打敗《鬼魅》超車全智賢》:https://web.archive.org/web/20180801130034/http://garageplay.tw/news/content/189 (檢索日:2022年
    09月28日)
    國家電影及視聽中心,2003~2021,《中華民國電影年鑑》。
    維基百科,《台灣播出之韓劇列表》:https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%92%AD%E5%87%BA%E4%B9%8B%E9%9F%93%E5%8A%87%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8 (搜索日:2022年9月27日)
    韓國國際文化交流振興院,2012年至2022年,《全球韓流現況調查》。
    Netflix,《Top 10 By Country》:https://top10.netflix.com/taiwan/tv?week=2021-07-04 (搜索日:2022年09月27日)

    【韓】專書
    강현화 외(2016) , 『한국어교육 문법』, 한글파크.(Kang, Hyun-hwa等人,2016,『韓國語教育 文法』,Hangeul Park。)
    南基心・高永根・劉賢敬・崔炯龍(2021),『標準國語文法論』,韓國文化社。

    【韓】期刊論文
    김정림(2015), 「자막번역의 제약과 축소 전략 연구」, 『통번역학연구』 제19권 제2호, 한국외국어대학교 통번역연구소, pp.111-134.(Kim, Jeong-Rim,2015,「字幕翻譯之限制與縮減翻譯之研究」,『通翻譯學研究』 第19卷 第2號,韓國外國語大學 通翻譯研究所,pp.111-134。)
    김재원(2016), 「영상번역에서의 가독성 제고를 위한 전환번역 사례분석 연구」, 『언어학연구』 제21권 제2집, 한국언어연구학회, pp.99-115.(Kim, Jae-Won,2016,「為提高影像翻譯可讀性之轉換翻譯實例分析研究」,『語言學研究』 第21卷 第2集,韓國語言研究學會,pp.69-79。)
    곽추문(2018), 「한류의 대만 진출 역사 및 대만인의 한류 인식」, 『디아스포라연구』 제12권 제1호, 전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소, pp.83-111.(郭秋雯,2018,「韓流在台發展歷史與台灣人的韓流意識」,『僑胞研究』 第12卷 第1號,全南大學 國際僑胞研究所,pp.83-111。)
    박윤철(2007), 「영화자막에서 시각기호에 의한 축소번역: 영상번역 중심으로」, 『번역학연구』 제8권, 한국번역학회, pp.125-145.(Park, Yoon-Cheol,2007,「電影字幕中透過視覺記號構成之縮減翻譯:以影像翻譯為中心」,『翻譯學研究』 第8卷,韓國翻譯學會,pp.125-145。)
    ______(2018), 「영화의 영한 자막번역에 나타난 생략과 삭제의 구분에 관한 연구」, 『Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology』 제8권 제8호, 한국번역학회, pp.739-748.(Park, Yoon-Cheol,2018,「電影英韓字幕翻譯中出現之省略與刪除區分研究」,『Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology』 第8卷 第8號,韓國翻譯學會,pp.739-748。)
    안인경(2015), 「번역 가독성 개념에 대하여」, 『언어과학연구』제74집, 언어과학회, pp.149-153.(Ahn, In-kyoung,2015,「關於翻譯可讀性之概念」,『語言科學研究』第74集,語言科學會,pp.149-153。)
    이은숙(2009), 「자막 축소번역에 대한 연구-영화와 다큐멘터리장르 중심으로-」, 『언어학 연구』 제15권, 한국중원언어학회, pp.149-168.(Lee, Eun-Sook,2009,「字幕縮減翻譯之研究-以電影及紀錄片為中心-」,『語言學研究』 第15卷, 韓國中原言語學會,pp.149-168。)
    ______(2012), 「자막번역의 가독성 전략:축약과 정보 변화 중심으로」, 『통역과 번역』 제14권 제2호, 한국통역번역학회, pp.155-156.(Lee, Eun-Sook,2012,「字幕翻譯的可讀性策略:以簡縮與資訊變化為中心」,『通譯與翻譯』 第14卷 第2號,韓國通譯翻譯學會, pp.155-156。)
    이한규(2007), 「한국어 대명사 ‘우리’ 」, 『담화와 인지』 제14권 3호, 담화・인지언어학회, pp. 155-178.(Lee, Han-Gyu,2007,「韓語代名詞’우리’」,『言談和認知』 第14卷 第3號,言談・認知語言學會,pp.155-178。)
    진경지(2019), 「‘한류’ 용어의 어원 및 대만 한류 발전에 대한 고찰」, 『동아시아문화연구』 제77호, 한양대학교 동아시아문화연구소, pp.221-237. (陳慶智,2019,「‘韓流’用語的語源與台灣韓流發展考察」,『東亞細亞文化研究』 第77號,漢陽大學 東亞細亞文化研究所,pp.221-237。)

    【韓】學位論文
    권준모(2012), 「영상번역의 특징과 한계: 영한 자막번역을 중심으로」, 한국방송통신대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문.(Kwon, Jun-Mo,2012,「影像翻譯的特徵與限制:以韓英字幕翻譯為中心」,韓國放送通信大學 實用英語學研究所,碩士學位論文。)
    陳偉楠(2021), 「한국 드라마 『쓸쓸하고 찬란하神 - 도깨비』의 한중 자막번역 연구」, 충남대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문.(陳偉楠,2021,「韓國戲劇『孤單又燦爛的神-鬼怪』的韓中字幕翻譯研究」,忠南大學 中語中文研究所,碩士學位論文。)
    장초판(2019), 「중한 자막축역 전략 연구 : 드라마『홀이금하: 그해 여름』을 중심으로」, 한국외국어대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문.(Jiang, Chao-Fan,2019,「中韓字幕縮譯策略研究:以戲劇『忽而今夏』為中心」,韓國外國語大學 對外韓語翻譯研究所,碩士學位論文。)
    이맹요(2021), 「적합성 이론에 근거한 중한 영상 자막 번역 전략 연구 : 영화 『먼 훗날 우리(後來的我們)』를 중심으로」, 한국외국어대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문.(Li, Meng-Yo,2021,「以關聯理論為基礎之中韓影像字幕翻譯策略研究:以電影『後來的我們』為中心」,韓國外國語大學 對外韓語翻譯研究所,碩士學位論文。)
    李爽(2020), 「한국 드라마 『SKY 캐슬』의 한중 자막 번역 전략 연구」, 충남대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문.(李爽,2020,「韓國戲劇『Sky Castle』的韓中字幕翻譯策略」,忠南大學 中語中文研究所,碩士學位論文。)

    【韓】網路資料
    온라인이슈팀, ’신과 함께’, 개봉 3일만에 130만 관객 돌파···박스오피스 1위, 「아시아경제」, 2017년12월23일.(網路話題組,’與神同行’,上映僅三日即突破130萬觀看人數,「亞細亞經濟」,2017年12月23日:https://cm.asiae.co.kr/ article/2017122312110359353)
    KOBIS, 2022, 역대박스오피스. (KOBIS,2022,歷年電影票房:https://www.kobis.or.kr/ kobis/business/stat/offc/findFormerBoxOfficeList.do )
    ’김계연, `신과 함께` 관객 1천만 돌파…한국영화 16번째(종합), 「연합뉴스」, 2018년1월4일.(Kim, Kye-Yeon,’與神同行觀看次數突破1千萬⋯韓國電影史上第16部(綜合),2018年1月4日:https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR2018010 3155851005)
    나무위키,2022,장병 병영생활 도움제도(Namu Wiki,2022,官兵軍營生活協助制度:https://namu.wiki/w/%EC%9E%A5%EB%B3%91%20%EB%B3%91%EC%98% 81%EC%83%9D%ED%99%9C%20%EB%8F%84%EC%9B%80%EC%A0%9C%EB%8F%84)

    【英】專書
    Assis Rosa, A. (2001), Features of oral and written communication in subtitling, In Y.Gambier & H. Gottlieb (Eds.), (Multi)Media Translation: Concepts, practice, and research, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Baker, M. (1992), In other words: A coursebook on translation, London and New York: Routledge.
    Baker, M. (1998), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies, London and New York: Routledge.
    Barbara Fox (2010), Introduction., In Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis,& Margaret Maclagan (Eds), Filler, Pauses and Placeholders, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983), Discourse analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Gottlieb, H. (1992), Subtitling- A new university discipline, In C. Dollerup, & A. Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpretation: Training, talent and experience, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.(轉引自:楊承淑,2008,〈同步口譯與字幕翻譯之簡化原則〉,《編譯論叢》,第8卷,第1期,國家教育研究院。)
    ______, H. (1998), Subtitling, In Baker, M. (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, London and New York: Routledge.
    Klaudy, K. (1993), On Explicitation Hypothesis, in Baker, M. (1998), Routledge Encyclopedia of translation studies, London and New York: Routledge.
    Kovačič Irena (1994), Relevance as a Factor in Subtitling Reduction, In Cay Dollerup and Annette Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    Levenston, E. A. and Blum, Shoshana. (1977), Aspects of lexical simplification in the speech and writing of advanced adult learners, In P.S. Corder & E. Roulet (Eds.), The notions of simplification, Interlanguages and pidgins and their relation to second language pedagogy, Fac. de Lettres.(轉引自:Blum-Kulka, S., & Levenston, E. A. (1978), Universals of lexical simplification, language learning, Volume 28, Number 2.)
    Nida, Eugene A (1964), Toward a Science of Translation, Leiden:E.J.Bril, pp.231-233.
    Edward T. Hall(1976), Beyond culture, New York: Anchor Press/Double day.
    Toury (1995), Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Vanderauwera, Ria Dutch Novels Translated into English: The Transformation ofa `Minority`, Literature, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1985.(引用自:Baker, M. (1998), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies, London and New York: Routledge.)
    Vinay, J. P., & Darbelnet, J.(1995), Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation, Amsterdam: Banjamins.
    Sara Laviosa-Braithwaite (1998), Universals of Translation , In Baker, M. (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, London/New York: Routledge.
    Jorge Diaz Cintas and Aline Remael (2007), Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling, London and New York: Routledge.
    Sperber, D. and Wilson, D (1995), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.
    Yves Gambier (2013), The position of audiovisual translation studies, The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies, London: Routledge5.

    【英】期刊論文
    Blum-Kulka, S., & Levenston, E. A. (1978), Universals of lexical simplification, language learning, Volume 28, Number 2, pp.399-415.
    Dagut, Menachem, B. (1971), A linguistic analysis of some semantic problems of Hebrew-English translation, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Jerusalem.(轉引自:Blum-Kulka, S., & Levenston, E. A. (1978), Universals of lexical simplification, language learning, Volume 28, Number 2, pp.399-415.)
    Frederic Chaume (2004), Film Studies and Translation Studies: Two Disciplines at Stake in Audiovisual Translation, Meta, Volume 49, Number 1, pp.12-24.
    Goldman-Eisler, Frieda (1972), Segmentation of input in simultaneous translation, Journal of psycholinguistic research, 1(2). New York: Plenum, pp.127-140.
    Henri C. Barik, 1971, A Description of Various Types of Omissions, Additions and Errors of Translation Encountered in Simultaneous Interpretation, Meta, 16(4), pp.199-210.
    Jakobson, R. (1959), On linguistic aspects of translation, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp.232-239.
    Muffy E. A. Siegel (2002), Like: the Discourse Particle and Semantics, Journal of Semantics, pp.35-71.
    John Honeyfield (1977), Simplification, Tesol Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 4, pp.431-440.
    Mountford, Allan (1976), The notion of simplification: its relevance materials preparation for English for science and technology, In Jack C. Richards (ed.), English for Science and Technology, Singapore: Singapore University press for the SEAMO Regional English Language Centre, pp.9-20.(轉引自:Wen, T. H. (2009), Simplification as a Recurrent Translation Feature: A Corpus-based Study of Modern Chinese Translated Mystery Fiction in Taiwan, University of Manchester.)
    Roberto Mayoral, Dorothy Kelly and Natividad Gallardo (1988), Concept of Constrained Translation. Non-Linguistic Perspectives of Translation, Translators’Journal , Volume 33, Number 3,pp.356-367.

    【英】學位論文
    Wen, T. H. (2009), Simplification as a Recurrent Translation Feature: A Corpus-based Study of Modern Chinese Translated Mystery Fiction in Taiwan, University of Manchester.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    韓國語文學系
    109557003
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109557003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Korea Language and culture] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700301.pdf2931KbAdobe PDF280View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback