Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150129
|
| Title: | 關鍵提問在高中國文教學社群之行動實踐研究
Action Research on Critical Questioning in the High School Chinese Literature Teaching Community |
| Authors: | 李榮哲
Lee, Jung-Che |
| Contributors: | 詹志禹
Zhan, Zhi-Yu
李榮哲
Lee, Jung-Che |
| Keywords: | 關鍵提問
教師專業學習社群
教學實踐
探究歷程
自我賦能
critical questioning
teacher professional learning community
teaching practice
inquiry process
self-empowerment |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-03-01 12:39:17 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 提問是教師最常使用的教學策略，而教師專業學習社群是提供教師專業成長的重要路徑。然而，有效的提問策略具備什麼特性？而怎樣的社群模式或經營策略才能有效促進教師的專業成長或教學實踐的動機？
「關鍵提問」為促發學習者批判思維並形成探究歷程的提問策略。本研究即以「關鍵提問」為研究焦點，分別從教師社群及高中國文教學兩個層面，探討關鍵提問的應用情形及其對社群或學習者產生的影響。
研究者以自身參與的提問教學社群為研究對象，並與社群成員共同進行為期一年的「關鍵提問」探究。在歷經社群的醞釀、實踐與統整階段後，社群成員對於「關鍵提問」不僅有認知面的改變，在教學實踐中亦展現自我賦能的情形；而社群成員則在教學實踐中發現關鍵提問對於學生具有引發探究、自我提問與學習遷移等成效。透過分析社群運作記錄、個別訪談記錄與反思札記等資料，歸納研究重要結果如下：
一、關鍵提問能引發探究歷程，並能有效促發學習者的批判性思維、創意思維與自我提問。
二、關鍵提問有助於教學者以學習者為主體進行提問設計，並可在教學中看見學習者具體的變化歷程。
三、關鍵提問是一種結合學習內容、有效提問策略與互動歷程的教學思維。
四、關鍵提問可有效形塑社群的探究氛圍與促進教學實踐的動機，進而促進社群的轉變。
最後，研究者根據研究結果提出建議，以供關注「關鍵提問」的教師及未來研究者之參考。
Questioning is a commonly used teaching strategy by teachers, and teacher professional learning communities are important pathways for providing professional growth for teachers. However, what characteristics does an effective questioning strategy possess? And what types of community models or management strategies can effectively promote teachers' professional growth and motivation in their teaching practices?
Critical questioning is a questioning strategy that stimulates learners' critical thinking and fosters an inquiry process. This study focuses on "critical questioning" and investigates its application and impact on both teacher communities and high school Chinese language instruction.
The researcher himself participated in a questioning teaching community as the subjects of the study, conducting a one-year investigation into "critical questioning" with other community members. After going through stages of community development, practice, and integration, not only did the members' understanding of "critical questioning" change, but they also demonstrated self-empowerment in their own teaching practices. Additionally, they discovered that critical questioning had effects on students such as triggering inquiry, self-questioning, and learning transfer. By analyzing data from community operation records, individual interview records, and reflective notes, the essential results of the study are as follows:
1.Critical questioning can initiate an inquiry process and effectively stimulate learners' critical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and self-questioning abilities.
2.Critical questioning helps educators design questions from the perspective of learners as active participants in the learning process while observing concrete changes in learners during instruction.
3.Critical questioning is a pedagogical mindset that combines learning content with effective question strategies and interactive processes.
4.Critical questioning can shape an atmosphere of inquiry within a community while motivating teaching practices to foster transformative change within the community.
Finally, based on these research findings, recommendations were provided for teachers who are interested in critical questioning as well as future researchers in this field. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
丁一顧、江姮姬（2020）。臺灣教師專業學習社群實徵研究之分析與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，16 (2)，135-162。
王淑麗（2017）。教師專業學習社群運作成功的關鍵：信任。臺灣教育評論月刊，6 (10)，14-19。
成虹飛、顧瑜君（2004）。行動研究。載於謝臥龍（主編），質性研究（頁129-176）。新北市：心理出版社。
李榮哲（2019年7月）。人與事――戰地記者的歷史思辨。「108年度國語文素養導向教學觀議課工作坊」發表之教案。臺北市立第一女子高級中學。
李榮哲（2022）。關鍵提問促發學生閱讀探究――以高中國文課程為例。中等教育，73 (4)，104-110。doi:10.6249/SE.202212_73(4).0032
洪郁婷（2022）。教師於社群課程實踐之個案研究：以批判教育學為視角〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
夏林清（2008）。實踐取向的研究方法。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究理論、方法及本土研究實例（頁99-120）。新北市：巨流圖書公司。
教育部（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（再版）。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2011）。教師專業學習社群：領頭羊葵花寶典。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2014）。十二年國教總綱。臺北市：教育部。
陳佩英（2017）。對話即實踐：網絡學習社群專業資本積累之個案研究。教育科學研究期刊，62 (3)，159-191。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).06
鈕文英（2018）。質性研究方法與論文寫作（二版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
黃建翔（2020）。臺北市國中教師專業學習社群與教學創新表現關係之研究。教育科學期刊，19 (1)，47-76。
黃昭勳（2019）。教師發問行為之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊，8 (1)，281-291。
黃 偉（2011）。中美課堂提問研究述評及比較。天津師範大學學報：基礎教育版，12 (3)，50-55。
詹志禹（2003）。課程創新與教師的自我創化－－系統演化的觀點。教育資料集刊，28，145-173。
農興強、黃開蓮（2010）。新課程背景下課堂提問有效性的思考。中國教師，9，12-14。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。新北市：心理出版社。
劉倚禔、吳勁甫（2017）。教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊，16 (1)，157-169。
賴秀芬、郭淑珍（2008）。行動研究。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究理論、方法及本土研究實例（頁239-248）。新北市：巨流圖書公司。
謝進昌（2015）。有效的中文閱讀理解策略：國內實徵研究之最佳證據整合。教育科學研究期刊，60 (2)，33-77。
Browne, N. & Keeley, S.（2019）。學會提問（吳禮敬譯）。北京市：機械工業出版。
Erickson,H. L., Lanning,L. A., & French, R.（2018）。創造思考的教室－－概念為本的課程與教學（劉恆昌譯）。新北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：2017）
McTighe, J. & Wiggins, G.（2016）。核心問題：開啟學生理解之門（侯秋玲、吳敏而譯）。新北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：2013）
Walsh, J. A. & Sattes, B. D.（2020）。課室討論的關鍵：有意義的發言、專注聆聽與深度思考（張碧珠、陳曉蕙、呂潔樺、林芯汝、劉慧平、梁家慶譯）。臺北市：五南文化出版社。（原著出版年：2016）
Yin, R. K.（2009）。個案研究設計與方法（周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯）。臺北市：五南文化出版社。（原著出版年：2008）
二、英文部分
Academy of Singapore Teachers. (2022a). Critical Inquiry in Professional Development. Retrieved January 5, 2022, from https://academyofsingaporeteachers.moe.edu.sg/
Academy of Singapore Teachers. (2022b). Professional Learning Communities. Retrieved January 5, 2022, from https://academyofsingaporeteachers.moe.edu.sg/
Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoritical study. Journal of King Saud University - Languange and Translation, 24, 35-41.
Barjesteh, H., & Vaseghi., R. (2012). Critical thinking:A reading strategy in developing English reading comprehension performance. Sheikhbahaee EFL Journal, 1(2), 21–33.
Case, R., & Balcaen, P. (2008). Supporting a community of critical thinkers. In R. Case, & P. Clark. (Eds.), The anthology of social studies: Issues and strategies for elementary educators(pp.86-95). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Davoudi, M., & Sadeghi, N. A. (2015). A Systematic Review of Research on Questioning as a High-level Cognitive Strategy. English Language Teaching, 8(10). doi:10.5539/elt.v8n10p76
Doğan, S., & Adams, A. (2018). Effect of professional learning communities on teachers and students: reporting updated results and raising questions about research design. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,29(4), 634–659. doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1500921
Dufour, R. (2004). What is professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners.International Journal of Lifelong Education ,10(4), 287-303. doi: 10.1080/0260137910100403
Golding, C. (2011). Educating for critical thinking: thought‐encouraging questions in a community of inquiry. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 357–370. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.499144
Ibrahim, N.K. (2015). Critical literacy: Performance and reactions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies , 5(4), 756–764. doi:10.17507/tpls.0504.11
Johnson, C. W., & Voelkel, R. H. (2019). Developing increased leader capacity to support effective professional learning community teams. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1600039
Jun, X. (2011). The application of critical thinking in teaching English reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(2), 136–141. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.2.136-141
King, A. (1995). Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across the curriculum: Inquiring minds really do want to know: Using questioning to teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1) , 13–17.
Lewis, K. G. (2006). Developing questioning skills. Retrieved from https://www1.udel.edu/chem/white/U460/Devel-question-skills-UTx.pdf
MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 23(4), 38–41.
McTighe, J. (2008). Making the most of professional learning communities. The Learning Principal, 3(8), 3-7.
Mohseni, F., Seifoori, Z., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-22. doi:10.1080/2331186x.2020.1720946
Nappi, J. S.(2017).The Importance of Questioning in Developing Critical Thinking Skills.Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin:International Journal for Professional Educators, 84(1), 30-41.
Pardales, M., & Girod, M. (2006). Community of inquiry: Its past and present future. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 299–310.
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., Moreira, A., Lopes, B., & Watts, M. (2014). So much more than just a list: exploring the nature of critical questioning in undergraduate sciences. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 115–134. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.902811
Peterson, D.S., Taylor, B.M., Burnham, B., & Schock, R. (2009). Reflective coaching conversations: A missing piece. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 500–509. doi:10.1598/RT.62.6.4
Peterson, D. S., & Taylor, B. M. (2012). Using higher order questioning to accelerate students’ growth in reading. The Reading Teacher,65(5), 295-304. doi:10.1002/trtr.01045
Riley, K. (2015). Enacting Critical Literacy in English Classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(5), 417–425. doi:10.1002/jaal.371
Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Making thinking visible. Educational Leadership, 65(5),57–61.
Savage, L. B. (1998). Eliciting Critical Thinking Skills through Questioning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 71(5), 291–293. doi:10.1080/00098659809602727
Tienken, C. H., Goldberg, S., & DiRocco, D. (2010). Questioning the questions. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75(9), 28–32. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
103152502 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103152502 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 250201.pdf | | 4943Kb | Adobe PDF | 2 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
