政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33395
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109952/140887 (78%)
造访人次 : 46352153      在线人数 : 812
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33395


    题名: 從隱喻與轉喻的觀點看人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現
    Lexical Manifestation of Human Thinking Process in Mandarin:A Metaphoric and Metonymic Account
    作者: 高惠珊
    Gao, Hui-shan
    贡献者: 賴惠玲
    Lai, Huei-Ling
    高惠珊
    Gao, Hui-shan
    关键词: 思考過程
    隱喻
    轉喻
    認知語意機制
    thinking process
    metaphor
    metonymy
    cognitive mechanism
    日期: 2004
    上传时间: 2009-09-17 16:28:19 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探究有關「思考｣ 的中文辭彙，藉以一窺人類思考過程的全貌，並進一步透過隱喻與轉喻等認知語意機制 (參看Kövecses and Radden 1998, Lakoff 1993, Ruiz de Mendoza 2000, Diez Velasco’s 2003等人之論著)，分析人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現。
    首先，我們修改認知心理學中所提的訊息處理模型 (參看Palmer and Kimchi 1986, Sternberg 1969, and Neisser 1967等人之論著)，根據修改過後的模型，得到人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現可分為七種類型。在進一步分析後發現，有關「思考｣ 的中文辭彙所牽涉的認知語意機制包括Lakoff (1993)提出的隱喻類型，Kövecses & Radden (1998)及Diez Velasco’s (2003)提出的轉喻類型，及Ruiz de Mendoza (2003)所提出來的隱喻和轉喻的交互模式，而本研究另外發現需透過三重轉喻及兩個新的隱喻和轉喻的交互模式才能完整建立起人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現的字面語意與其象徵語意之間的連結。
    In this study, we intend to claim that the backstage cognition of thinking process, through linguistic manifestation, can be explicitly detected with six dynamic continuing stages. In addition, each stage reifies itself with linguistic expressions of concrete observable parts or organs of body, which in turn demonstrate that lexical manifestation of thinking is heavily based on such mechanisms as metaphor and metonymy. (cf. Kövecses and Radden 1998, Lakoff 1993, Ruiz de Mendoza 2000, Diez Velasco’s 2003).
    First of all, we refine the information processing model proposed in cognitive psychology (cf. Palmer and Kimchi 1986, Sternberg 1969, and Neisser 1967). Based on the refined model, the Mandarin lexical reification of thinking is claimed to fall into six stages corresponding to six types. A special case linking two or more stages is observed as the seventh type.
    Then, we probe into the linguistic data from the seven types of thinking. The analysis discovers that a full explanation of those linguistic data from the six stages of the thinking process requires the activation of some types of metaphor. We have also found metonymy provides mental access to thinking activities.
    As to the interaction of metonymy, the three types of double metonymy are not sufficient to account for the lexical manifestation of thinking. Triple metonymy also needs to be employed to explain the meaning derivations of the data.
    Finally, it is found that the three interaction models of metaphor and metonymy are insufficient to cover all the possible interactions of cognitive mechanisms behind the lexical manifestation of thinking in Mandarin. This study reveals two new interaction models not mentioned by Ruiz de Mendoza (2000).
    參考文獻: 1. English Version
    Ashcraft, Mark H. 1994. Human memory and cognition. Human memory and cognition
    Atkinson, R. and Shiffrin, R. 1968. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2), ed by K Spence and J Spence. New York: Academic Press.
    Best, John B. 1999. Cognitive psychology. Brooks/ Cole Wadsworth
    Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hagne, Mouton.
    ________.1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
    ________.1980. Rules and Representations, Blackwell, Oxford.
    Dijk, T.A. van and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York.
    Fortescue, Micheal. 2001. Thoughts about thought. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 15-45.
    Ho, Chio-yueh (何秋月). 2003. A Semantic Study of Auditory Perception Metaphors in Chinese. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: Providence University.
    Jäkel, Olaf. 1995. The metaphorical conception of the mind: “Mental activity is manipulation”. Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, ed. by Taylor, J. R. and R. E. Maclaury, 197-229. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Kess, Joseph F. 1992. Psycholinguistics : psychology, linguistics, and the study of natural language. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Pub. Co.
    Kövecses and Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguisitcs 9-1, 37-77.
    Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor: Metaphor and thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202-51. Cambridge University Press.
    Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
    ________. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    Neisser, Ulric. 1967. Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliff: Prentice-Hall.
    Palmer, S. E., and Kimchi, R. 1986. The information processing approach to cognition. Approaches to cognition: Contrasts and controversies, ed. by Knapp, T. J., and Robertson, L. C., 37-77. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Piaget, J. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
    Radden, Günter. 2003. How metonymic are metaphors. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective, ed. by Barcelona A., 93-108. Berlin; New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
    Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony, 284-297. Cambridge, England: At the University Press.
    Rips, L. J. and Conrad, F. G.. 1989. The folk psychology of mental activities. Psychological Review, 96, 187-207.
    Ruiz de Mendoza. 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective, ed. by Barcelona A., 109-132. Berlin; New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
    Ruiz de Mendoza and Diez Velasco. 2003. Patterns of conceptual interaction. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, ed. by Dirven R. and PÖrings R., 489-532. Berlin; New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
    Sapir, E. 1944. Grading: A study in semantics. Philosophy of Science, 11, 93-116
    Sternberg, S. 1969. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s Method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
    Stevenson, Rosemary J. 1993. Language, thought, and representation. Chichester, England ; New York : J. Wiley & Sons.
    Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Tsai, Li-zhong (蔡立中). 1994. The Metaphor of Body-Parts in Chinese. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: National Tsing Hua University.
    Watson, J.B. 1925. Behaviorism. New York, Norton.
    Webster’s World Dictionary of The American Language. 1997. The Official Dictionary of the Associated Press.
    Whorf, B.L. 1941. The relation of habitual thought and behaviour to language, Language, Culture and Personality, ed. by L. Spier, 75-93. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah.
    Yang, Chun-ting (楊純婷). 2000. Synaesthetic Words in Mandarin: Perceptual Metaphor and Metaphorical Extension. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: National Chung Cheng University.
    Yen, Chao-tai (顏兆泰). 2000. A Semantic Study of Chinese Metaphors Derived from Visual Perception. M. A. Thesis. Taipei: Fu Jen Catholic University.
    Yu, Ning. 2003. Chinese metaphors of Thinking. Cognitive Linguistics 14, 141-165.
    ________. 2004. The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 663-686.
    Zhung, Feng Ya (鍾風雅). 2002. A Semantic Study of Mandarin Perception Verbs Kan, Ting and Wen. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
    2. Chinese Version
    CKIP(中央研究院平衡語料庫)
    成語典[The Dictionary of Idioms], 天母書城. Cheng Yu Dian [Dictionary of Chinese Idioms]. TianMu Books.
    辭海[Chinese Dictionary],智揚出版社 Ci Hai [Chinese Dictionary]. ZhiYang Press.
    形音義規範字典[Chinese Dictionary], 2003, 五南出版社 Xing Yin Yi Guifan Zidian [Form Pronunciation and Meaning of Chinese Character Dictionary]. WuNan Press
    常用字引申義辭典[Chinese Dictionary], 1992, 吉林 人民出版 新華發行 Chang Yong Zi Yin Shen Yi Cidian [Definition of Common Phrases Dictionary]. Jilin: People Press.
    東方國語辭典[Chinese Dictionary], 1994, 臺北市 東方出版社 Dongfang Guoyu Cidian [Mandarin Dictionary]. Taipei: Dongfang Press.
    新編國語日報辭典[Chinese Dictionary], 2000, 國語日報 Xinbian Guoyu Ribao Cidian [Revised Mandarin Dictionary]. Mandarin Daily News Press.
    現代漢英字典[A Chinese-English Dictionary], 1988, 萬人出版社 Xindai Han Ying Zidian [Modern Chinese-English Dictionary]. Wanren Press.
    3. Online Resources:
    Academia Sinica balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese
    http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~tibe/2-words/modern-words/
    Dictionary of Chinese Idioms
    http://140.111.34.46/chengyu/sort_pho.htm
    Chinese-English Dictionary of Modern Usage
    http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/Lindict/
    Mandarin Dictionary
    http://140.111.34.46/dict/
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    91555009
    93
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550091
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    55009101.pdf29KbAdobe PDF21006检视/开启
    55009102.pdf19KbAdobe PDF2758检视/开启
    55009103.pdf76KbAdobe PDF21094检视/开启
    55009104.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2857检视/开启
    55009105.pdf53KbAdobe PDF2967检视/开启
    55009106.pdf10KbAdobe PDF2879检视/开启
    55009107.pdf10KbAdobe PDF2908检视/开启
    55009108.pdf21KbAdobe PDF2963检视/开启
    55009109.pdf87KbAdobe PDF21330检视/开启
    55009110.pdf72KbAdobe PDF21834检视/开启
    55009111.pdf163KbAdobe PDF21295检视/开启
    55009112.pdf172KbAdobe PDF21161检视/开启
    55009113.pdf40KbAdobe PDF21013检视/开启
    55009114.pdf172KbAdobe PDF22276检视/开启
    55009115.pdf53KbAdobe PDF22114检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈